📍 When to use this template
- Weekly review at site office; consolidated into MPR.
- Trigger for retraining / re-scheduling when productivity < 75 % of plan for 2 consecutive weeks.
- Input to claims for delay (loss of productivity due to client-attributable disruption).
Sections & fields
Preview of the template structure. Download Excel to fill on site.
1Header4 fields
Project Name
_____________
Reporting Period (Week / Month)
_____________
Reviewed By (PM)
_____________
2Labour Productivity7 fields
Trade (Carpenter / Steel Fixer / Mason / Painter)
_____________
Gang Size (Nos)
_____________
Output Unit (cum / sqm / kg / pcs)
_____________
Planned Norm per Man-day
_____________
Actual Output per Man-day
_____________
Productivity % (Actual / Planned × 100)
_____________
Variance Reason
_____________
3Plant + Equipment Productivity7 fields
Equipment ID + Type
_____________
Planned Utilization Hours
_____________
Actual Working Hours
_____________
Idle Hours (with reason)
_____________
Output (cum / trips / lifts)
_____________
Productivity Index
_____________
Breakdown Hours
_____________
4Formwork + Repetitive Activity6 fields
Activity (Slab Shuttering / Wall Concreting / Plastering)
_____________
Cycle Time Planned
_____________
Cycle Time Actual
_____________
Crew Allocation
_____________
Floor / Area Covered
_____________
Cumulative Floors (per cycle template)
_____________
5Action Items + Recommendations5 fields
Below-norm Gang ID
_____________
Root Cause Analysis
_____________
Corrective Action Owner
_____________
Status (Open / Closed)
_____________
💡 Sample filled excerpt
Trade: Steel Fixer | Gang: 8 | Unit: kg | Planned Norm: 250 kg/man-day | Actual: 180 kg/man-day | Productivity: 72 % | Reason: Bar bending machine breakdown, 6 hrs/day lost.
⚖ Compliance notes
- Productivity norms should be aligned to CPWD analysis of rates or project-specific historical data, not generic textbook values.
- Loss-of-productivity claims under FIDIC Sub-clause 8.4 / 20.1 typically require contemporaneous records — this tracker is the primary contemporary record.
- Cumulative productivity index < 80 % of plan over 4 weeks usually triggers a recovery program review under FIDIC Sub-clause 8.6 (Rate of Progress).
- Norms should be reviewed quarterly against actual achieved averages to avoid setting unrealistic targets.