InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
IRC 37 : 2018

Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements

AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures · EN 13108 series · Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology
CurrentEssentialCode of PracticeTransportation · Roads and Pavement
PDFGoogleIRC Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
Summary

IRC 37 is India's primary code for flexible (bituminous) pavement design — used for every national and state highway project. The 2018 edition adopts a mechanistic-empirical approach replacing the older empirical CBR-based method. Design involves estimating cumulative traffic (MSA), evaluating subgrade (CBR), selecting pavement layers (GSB, WMM, DBM, BC), and verifying against fatigue and rutting criteria. This is the most important IRC code for highway engineers.

Guidelines for structural design of flexible pavements for national highways, state highways, and other major roads using mechanistic-empirical approach. Covers traffic estimation, subgrade evaluation, pavement composition, and thickness design for bituminous pavements.

Key Values
Design period20 years for NH/SH, 15 years for other roads
Standard axle load80 kN (8.16 tonnes) single axle with dual wheels
Traffic categoriesLow (<2 MSA), Medium (2-10 MSA), High (10-50 MSA), Very High (50-150 MSA)
Practical Notes
! IRC 37:2018 uses mechanistic-empirical approach — software like IITPAVE or KENPAVE is needed for layer analysis.
! For traffic <2 MSA (rural roads), use IRC SP:72 instead of IRC 37.
! CBR of subgrade must be at 97% of MDD (Modified Proctor) — test at optimum moisture content.
! VDF (Vehicle Damage Factor) varies significantly by region — use actual axle load survey data, not assumed values.
! The design catalogue (Table 3) gives ready-to-use pavement compositions — use for preliminary design, verify with mechanistic analysis.
! Drainage layer (OGPC) is now mandatory between DBM and WMM for traffic >20 MSA.
! Temperature correction is critical — resilient modulus of bitumen changes 3-5× between 25°C and 45°C.
! For NH/SH projects, NHAI/MoRTH requires IRC 37 compliance — no alternative code is accepted.
! Always use the latest version of IRC 37 and cross-reference with other relevant IRC codes (e.g., IRC 73 for traffic studies, IRC 58 for rigid pavements if applicable for comparison).
! Thorough subgrade characterization is paramount. Multiple CBR tests at different depths and locations are essential. If CBR is low, consider soil stabilization or a thicker sub-base.
! Traffic estimation must be robust. Account for commercial vehicle composition and future growth conservatively, especially for National Highways carrying significant freight.
! Material quality control for Granular Sub-base (GSB) and Bituminous Macadam (BM) is critical. Ensure specified CBR values are met, and aggregate gradation is within limits to prevent premature failure.
! The mechanistic-empirical design requires accurate material properties. Laboratory testing for Resilient Modulus is preferred over empirical correlations for critical projects.
! Temperature correction for asphalt properties is vital. Use local meteorological data for accurate pavement temperature calculations, as it significantly impacts fatigue life.
! Drainage is often overlooked. Ensure proper camber, side drains, and sub-surface drainage provisions are incorporated as per Cl. 12 to protect the pavement structure from moisture damage.
! For high traffic volume roads, consider using a thicker wearing course or a more durable mix to extend service life and reduce maintenance cycles.
! Layered system analysis (e.g., using software) can provide a more refined design compared to simplified methods, especially for complex layer combinations or varying subgrade conditions.
! The design life of 20 years is a target. Actual performance depends heavily on construction quality, drainage, and adherence to maintenance schedules.
! Shoulder design is equally important. A poorly designed shoulder can lead to pavement edge deterioration, affecting overall structural integrity.
! Always consider the end-of-life scenario during design. Durability, recyclability of materials, and ease of maintenance should be factored in.
! For PMGSY roads, while IRC 37 provides guidelines, specific project requirements and budget constraints might necessitate adaptations, but core principles of sound design must be followed.
! Ensure adequate compaction of all layers. Insufficient compaction is a primary cause of premature rutting and fatigue cracking.
! The concept of Equivalent Axle Load (EAL) is crucial for load analysis and should be correctly calculated based on vehicle classification and axle configurations.
! Regular condition surveys and timely maintenance are essential to achieve the designed service life of flexible pavements.
Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 73:2013Paving Bitumen - Specification
→
IS 1203:1978Methods for testing tar and bitumen: Determin...
→
IS 2720:1973Methods of test for soils - Determination of ...
→
IS 383:2016Coarse and Fine Aggregates for Concrete - Spe...
→
IRC 58:2015Guidelines for the Design of Plain Jointed Ri...
→
IRC 6:2017Standard Specifications and Code of Practice ...
→
flexible pavementroad designbituminous pavementhighway designpavement thicknessCBRMSAIRC
📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →
Similar International Standards
AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement StructuresAASHTO (US)
HighCurrent
Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993/2020 Supplement)
Both are the primary national flexible pavement design standards. AASHTO uses structural number (SN) approach while IRC 37 (2018) uses mechanistic-empirical approach.
EN 13108 seriesCEN (EU)
MediumCurrent
Bituminous mixtures — Material specifications
EN 13108 covers bituminous mix specifications. For pavement structural design, individual EU countries have national annexes to Eurocode.
Austroads Guide to Pavement TechnologyAustroads (Australia)
HighCurrent
Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural Design
Both use mechanistic-empirical approach with similar design criteria (fatigue cracking and rutting).
Key Differences
≠IRC 37:2018 uses mechanistic-empirical with Indian-calibrated transfer functions. AASHTO 1993 uses empirical (AASHO Road Test). AASHTO ME (MEPDG) is mechanistic-empirical like IRC 37.
≠IRC: 80 kN (8.16 tonnes) single axle. AASHTO: 80 kN (18,000 lb = 18 kip) single axle. Same value.
≠IRC 37 designs for Indian tropical climate (35°C pavement temperature). AASHTO ME considers full climate spectrum. IRC approach is simpler but India-specific.
Key Similarities
≈Both convert mixed traffic to equivalent standard axles — IRC uses MSA, AASHTO uses ESALs. The concept and standard axle load (80 kN) are identical.
≈Both design pavements as multi-layer systems: subgrade, sub-base, base, binder course, wearing course. Material specifications differ but the structural concept is the same.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Standard axle load80 kN (8.16 tonnes)80 kN (18 kip)AASHTO
Design period (major road)20 years20-30 yearsAASHTO ME
Min subgrade CBR5%3% (with treatment below 3%)AASHTO
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use
Quick Reference Values
Design period20 years for NH/SH, 15 years for other roads
Standard axle load80 kN (8.16 tonnes) single axle with dual wheels
Traffic categoriesLow (<2 MSA), Medium (2-10 MSA), High (10-50 MSA), Very High (50-150 MSA)
Subgrade CBR min5% (if less, improve subgrade)
BC (wearing course) thickness40-50 mm
DBM (binder course) thickness50-100 mm per layer
WMM (base) thickness150-250 mm
GSB (sub-base) thickness200-300 mm
Fatigue criterionHorizontal tensile strain at bottom of bituminous layer
Rutting criterionVertical compressive strain on top of subgrade
Design Life (Years)20 (for National Highways and State Highways)
Standard Deviation of Axle Load Distribution (σz)0.28 (for rigid wheels)
Poisson's Ratio for Bitumen Macadam0.35
Poisson's Ratio for Granular Sub-base0.35
Poisson's Ratio for Subgrade0.40
Bulk Density of Bitumen (kg/m³ at 15°C)1020
Minimum CBR for Subgrade (as per Table 3)2.5 %
Maximum Temperature Gradient (ΔT)20°C
Fatigue Cracking Limit (EAC) for Wearing Course2.0 x 10⁻⁶ strain
Rutting Limit (Vertical Strain at Subgrade)0.0004
Granular Sub-base Minimum CBR20 %
Shoulder Granular Sub-base Minimum CBR30 %
Traffic Growth Rate (Typical)7.5 % (for NH/SH)
Equivalent Single Wheel Load (ESWL) Calculation Factor1.0 (for simplified method)
Resilient Modulus of Subgrade (Mr) Formula Coefficient (A)2621 (for clay)
Resilient Modulus of Subgrade (Mr) Formula Coefficient (B)0.0000000024 (for clay)
Horizontal Tensile Strain Limit for Bituminous Layers (EAC)750 microstrain
Vertical Compressive Strain Limit at Subgrade Surface (εv)0.0004
Modulus of Bituminous Macadam (MPa)1500 - 2500
Modulus of Granular Sub-base (MPa)150 - 250
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) for Layered Systems (kN/m³/m)50000
Key Formulas
Design traffic (MSA) = 365 × A × D × F × N × L / 10^6
Where: A = initial traffic (CVPD), D = lane distribution (0.75), F = VDF, N = growth factor ((1+r)^n - 1)/r, L = design lane factor
Fatigue life: Nf = 2.21 × 10^-4 × (1/εt)^3.89 × (1/MR)^0.854
Rutting life: Nr = 4.1656 × 10^-8 × (1/εv)^4.5337
εh = [ 3 + 2 * (E2/E1) + 0.75 * (E2/E1)² ] * (P/E1) * (1/h)² (Equivalent to Shell International formula for horizontal tensile strain, simplified form)
εv = [ 1.75 * P / (E1 * h²) ] (Simplified for vertical strain at subgrade)
Mr = A * (CBR)^B (Empirical relation for Resilient Modulus from CBR)
N = (4.19 x 10⁸) * (εt/εac)⁻²·³⁹ * (E/Eac)⁻¹·⁵ (Fatigue equation for crack initiation)
N = 1.87 x 10⁻⁷ * (εv)⁻⁴·⁷⁹ (Rutting equation for subgrade)
ESWL = (1.5 * P) / log₁₀( (1.75 * a) / h ) (Equivalent Single Wheel Load calculation, simplified)
Key Tables
Table 1 — Vehicle damage factor (VDF) for different vehicle types
Table 2 — Design traffic calculation
Table 3 — Pavement design catalogue for subgrade CBR 5-15%
Table 4 — Recommended bituminous mix specifications
Table 5 — Resilient modulus of bituminous mixes at 35°C
Table 3 — Classification of Subgrade Soils based on CBR
Table 4 — Typical Values of Poisson's Ratio for Pavement Materials
Table 5 — Typical Values of Resilient Modulus (Mr) for Subgrade Soils
Table 6 — Fatigue Cracking Models for Bituminous Layers
Table 7 — Rutting Models for Subgrade
Table 8 — Minimum California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Values for Granular Sub-base and Shoulder Material
Key Clauses
Cl. 3 — Traffic estimation: design traffic in terms of cumulative MSA (Million Standard Axles)
Cl. 4 — Subgrade evaluation: CBR value at 97% dry density
Cl. 5 — Pavement composition: sub-base (GSB), base (WMM/WBM), binder (DBM), surface (BC)
Cl. 6 — Pavement design catalogues for different traffic and subgrade conditions
Cl. 7 — Mechanistic-empirical design: fatigue and rutting criteria
Cl. 8 — Drainage layer requirements
Cl. 9 — Design of bituminous layers: resilient modulus, Poisson's ratio, fatigue life
Cl. 3.1.1 — General
Cl. 4.1 — Traffic Estimation
Cl. 5.1 — Subgrade Evaluation and Classification
Cl. 6.1 — Material Characterisation
Cl. 7.1 — Design Traffic Load
Cl. 8.1 — Pavement Temperature
Cl. 9.1 — Mechanistic Design Approach
Cl. 10.1 — Thickness Design of Flexible Pavements
Cl. 11.1 — Design of Shoulders
Cl. 12.1 — Drainage and Subsurface Water Control
What is MSA in road design?+
MSA = Million Standard Axles — the cumulative number of standard (80 kN) axle loads expected over the design period (typically 20 years). A commercial vehicle with heavier axles causes more damage than one standard axle — this is captured by the VDF (Vehicle Damage Factor). Design traffic in MSA = daily commercial traffic × VDF × growth factor × design period.
What is the minimum CBR for subgrade?+
Minimum 5% CBR at 97% MDD per IRC 37. If subgrade CBR is less than 5%, the subgrade must be improved — options include: replacement with better soil, mechanical stabilization (addition of granular material), chemical stabilization (lime/cement treatment), or use of geosynthetics. CBR below 2% is very poor and almost always requires treatment.
IRC 37 vs IRC 58 — which to use?+
IRC 37 for FLEXIBLE pavements (bituminous surface — DBM + BC). IRC 58 for RIGID pavements (cement concrete — PQC). The choice depends on: traffic volume (rigid preferred for >30 MSA), subgrade condition, initial cost vs lifecycle cost, and maintenance capability. Most NH/SH projects now use flexible pavement per IRC 37.
What pavement layers does IRC 37 specify?+
Bottom to top: 1) Prepared subgrade (compacted natural soil, CBR ≥5%), 2) GSB — Granular Sub-Base (200-300mm), 3) WMM — Wet Mix Macadam (150-250mm), 4) DBM — Dense Bituminous Macadam (50-100mm, can be 2 layers), 5) BC — Bituminous Concrete (40-50mm wearing course). For high traffic, a drainage layer (OGPC) is added between WMM and DBM.
What is the primary objective of IRC 37:2018?+
IRC 37:2018 provides guidelines for the structural design of flexible pavements using a mechanistic-empirical approach. Its main goal is to ensure the pavement structure can withstand the anticipated traffic loads and environmental conditions for a specified design life, minimizing distresses like fatigue cracking and rutting.
How is traffic load estimated for pavement design according to IRC 37:2018?+
Traffic load estimation involves determining the number of commercial vehicles, their axle load configurations, and forecasting future traffic growth. The code outlines methods for conducting traffic surveys, calculating the Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF), and projecting the cumulative number of standard axle loads (ESALs) over the design life.
What is the role of the subgrade's CBR in flexible pavement design?+
The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of the subgrade is a fundamental parameter indicating its strength. A higher CBR value signifies a stronger subgrade, which can support a greater load and thus requires a thinner pavement structure. Conversely, a low CBR subgrade necessitates thicker pavement layers or soil improvement techniques.
Can I use the empirical design methods from previous IRC codes with IRC 37:2018?+
IRC 37:2018 strongly emphasizes the mechanistic-empirical approach. While some simplified methods might be presented for context, the primary design should be based on the mechanistic principles and empirical correlations provided within this code for accurate performance prediction.
What are the critical distresses that IRC 37:2018 aims to prevent?+
The code primarily focuses on preventing fatigue cracking in the bituminous layers and rutting in the overall pavement structure, particularly at the subgrade surface. It also considers other potential distresses like thermal cracking and shoving, ensuring the pavement maintains its structural integrity and serviceability.
How does pavement temperature affect the design of flexible pavements?+
Pavement temperature significantly influences the stiffness and performance of bituminous materials. Higher temperatures can lead to rutting due to reduced stiffness, while lower temperatures might increase the susceptibility to thermal cracking. IRC 37:2018 provides methods to estimate average pavement temperatures and incorporate their effect in the design.
What is the minimum CBR requirement for Granular Sub-base (GSB)?+
According to IRC 37:2018, the minimum California Bearing Ratio (CBR) requirement for Granular Sub-base (GSB) material is generally 20 percent. For shoulder GSB, the requirement is higher, typically 30 percent, to ensure adequate structural support and drainage.
Are there specific design considerations for shoulders in IRC 37:2018?+
Yes, IRC 37:2018 includes specific guidelines for shoulder design, which is crucial for pavement edge stability and drainage. The design of shoulders often involves different material specifications, including higher CBR requirements for the shoulder sub-base compared to the main pavement sub-base.
What is the recommended design life for major roads in India?+
For National Highways and State Highways, the recommended design life for flexible pavements as per IRC 37:2018 is typically 20 years. Other categories of roads might have different design life recommendations based on their importance and anticipated traffic.
How can I account for the variability of subgrade properties in my design?+
IRC 37:2018 suggests considering the variability of subgrade properties by adopting a conservative approach. This may involve using a lower bound of the tested CBR or Resilient Modulus values, or designing for a lower percentile of subgrade strength to ensure adequate performance under the most probable conditions.
What software can be used for mechanistic design as per IRC 37:2018?+
While IRC 37:2018 outlines the principles, it doesn't mandate specific software. However, several commercially available pavement design software packages (e.g., KENPAVE, EVERCALC) are capable of performing mechanistic-empirical analyses and can be adapted to follow the guidelines and material properties specified in IRC 37:2018.
What is the significance of Resilient Modulus (Mr) in mechanistic design?+
Resilient Modulus (Mr) is a measure of the elastic recovery of a pavement material under repeated loading, representing its stiffness. In mechanistic design, Mr is crucial for accurately calculating stresses and strains within each pavement layer, leading to a more reliable prediction of fatigue life and rutting.