IS 457:1957 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for general construction of plain and reinforced concrete for dams and other massive structures. This code provides specific guidelines for the construction of mass concrete structures, primarily dams. It focuses heavily on managing the heat of hydration, temperature control, the use of exceptionally large aggregates (up to 150mm), and construction joint detailing to prevent thermal cracking in massive concrete pours.
Code of Practice for General Construction of Plain and Reinforced Concrete for Dams and Other Massive Structures
Key reference values — verify against the current code edition / project specification.
| Reference | Value | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Plain & RCC for dams & other massive structures | Scope |
| Design driver | Heat of hydration / thermal cracking — not 28-d strength | Concept |
| Cement | Low-heat / pozzolanic; MINIMUM content for strength | Critical |
| Aggregate | Large, well-graded (less paste = less heat) | Mix |
| Lifts | Limited thickness + placing interval to shed heat | Procedure |
| Cooling | Pre-cool (chilled agg/ice); embedded cooling pipes | Procedure |
| Joints | Contraction joints + water-stops at water face | Detail |
| Govern by | Core-to-surface ΔT and placing temperature | Critical |
| Base code | IS 456 (IS 457 adds the mass provisions) | Cross-ref |
IS 457:1957 is the code of practice for general construction of plain and reinforced concrete for dams and other massive structures — *mass concrete*: gravity dams, large rafts/blocks, thick piers, heavy foundations. It governs the construction problems that only appear at large volume — chiefly heat of hydration and thermal cracking — that IS 456 (member-scale RCC) does not address.
It sits in the mass-concrete stack:
In a thick pour the core hydrates, heats, and is restrained by the cooler skin and foundation — on cooling it cracks unless the heat is *managed at construction stage*. IS 457's provisions are about controlling that:
The engineering point: in mass concrete the enemy is the temperature differential, not the 28-day cube. Design and build to keep the core-to-surface ΔT and the placing temperature within limits, or the structure cracks regardless of strength.
Scenario: a large mass-concrete block (dam monolith or very thick raft).
Step 1 — mix for heat, not strength: select low-heat or PPC cement and the minimum cement content for the (modest) required strength; use large well-graded aggregate to cut paste and heat.
Step 2 — limit the lift: restrict lift thickness and set a placing interval so each lift sheds heat before being buried by the next.
Step 3 — control placing temperature: pre-cool (chilled aggregate/ice) so concrete is placed within the temperature limit; for big blocks, circulate water through embedded cooling pipes to cap the peak core temperature and the core-to-surface ΔT.
Step 4 — joints & curing: form contraction joints with water-stops, then cure long and protect against rapid surface cooling (which spikes the differential and cracks the skin).
Govern by ΔT and placing temperature — a mass pour that 'passed the cube' but ignored Steps 1–4 will still craze and crack through.
1. Designing mass concrete like member RCC. Chasing 28-day strength with rich, high-cement mixes maximises heat — exactly wrong for mass concrete; minimise cement.
2. No placing-temperature / pre-cooling control. Placing hot concrete in a thick block guarantees a high peak and thermal cracking.
3. Lifts too thick / placed too fast. Heat can't dissipate; the core bakes and the block cracks on cooling.
4. Contraction joints / water-stops skipped or mis-detailed. Uncontrolled cracking and leakage on the water face.
5. Rapid surface cooling / poor curing. Cold water or form-strip onto a hot core spikes the surface-to-core ΔT and cracks the skin.
IS 457 is very old (1957) and narrow, but it remains the Indian reference for the one regime IS 456 doesn't cover — concrete thick enough that its own heat of hydration is the design problem. Modern dam/mass-concrete practice goes further (detailed thermal modelling, staged cooling-pipe schedules, often referencing ACI 207), and the design criteria live in dam codes like IS 6512 — so IS 457 is best read as the construction-control backbone, supplemented for analysis. The enduring lesson is counter-intuitive to building engineers: in mass concrete you deliberately use less, cooler, leaner concrete and obsess over lift height, placing temperature and core-to-surface ΔT — strength is the easy part; cracking from restrained thermal contraction is what actually defeats massive structures.
| Parameter | IS Value | International | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical Lift Height | Generally limited to about 1.5 m. | Typically 1.5 m to 2.3 m, but must be justified by thermal analysis. | ACI 207.1R-05 |
| Maximum Size of Coarse Aggregate | Up to 150 mm, or even 200 mm in special cases. | Commonly 75 mm to 150 mm. | EM 1110-2-2000 |
| Maximum Allowable Temperature Differential | Not specified numerically; qualitative guidance to avoid cracking. | Often limited to 20°C (35°F) between the core and the surface. | ACI 207.1R-05 |
| Minimum Curing Period | Not less than 21 days for dams. | Minimum 14 days, often 21-28 days or longer depending on SCMs and exposure. | USACE EM 1110-2-2000 |
| Recommended Slump | As low as possible, not exceeding 25 to 50 mm. | Typically 25 to 75 mm (without water reducer). | ACI 207.1R-05 |
| Fly Ash Content (as % of cementitious material) | Not mentioned; use of pozzolana is suggested but not quantified. | Typically 25% to 50% for Class F fly ash; can be up to 70% in some applications. | EM 1110-2-2000 |