IS 3067:1988 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for general waterproofing and damp-proofing of buildings. This code establishes the general principles and recommended practices for waterproofing and damp-proofing of buildings. It details the material selection, surface preparation, and application methodologies for treating roofs, walls (DPC), and basements against moisture ingress.
Covers general recommendations for waterproofing and damp-proofing of buildings using various materials and methods.
Key reference values — verify against the current code edition / project specification.
| Reference | Value | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Fails at | Junctions, terminations, penetrations (not field) | Concept |
| Roof/terrace | Slope to outlets (≥~1:100), upturns at parapets | Critical |
| DPC | Continuous horizontal barrier (continuity = everything) | Detail |
| Sunken/wet | Turn up walls + sleeve & seal every penetration | Detail |
| Below-grade | Tanking vs water-resistant concrete by water table | Design |
| Test | Flood/pond test BEFORE covering; protect membrane | QC |
IS 3067:1988 is the code of practice for general design, construction and detailing of waterproofing and damp-proofing of buildings — the umbrella workmanship code covering DPC, basement/below-grade waterproofing, roof/terrace, wet-area and sunken-slab waterproofing, and the detailing that makes them work. It is the parent practice code that the system-specific waterproofing standards sit under.
It is read with the waterproofing stack:
Waterproofing fails at junctions, terminations and penetrations, not in the middle of the membrane — so IS 3067 emphasises *design and detailing* over product choice:
The key engineering point: slope, continuity, upturns/terminations and penetration sealing decide whether a building leaks — not the brand of membrane.
Scenario: terrace roof and a sunken toilet slab.
Terrace — Step 1: provide slope to outlets (≈1:100 min) so there is no ponding; the screed/brick-bat-coba or membrane is laid to this fall.
Step 2: carry the waterproofing as a continuous membrane with upturns ≥ ~150–300 mm at parapets/abutments, tucked into a groove; treat expansion joints and rainwater outlets with dressed/clamped detailing.
Sunken toilet — Step 3: apply bonded waterproofing to the sunken slab, turned up the surrounding walls; sleeve and seal every pipe penetration through the slab before filling.
Step 4 — flood test: pond-test (24–48 h) the terrace and the sunken slab *before* tiling/filling — leaks found now cost a sealant; leaks found after finishing cost a demolition.
Step 5 — protect: screed/protect the membrane before follow-on trades. Almost every building leak is a *detailing/penetration/slope* failure caught by this flood test, not a membrane-material failure.
1. No / inadequate slope → ponding. Flat 'waterproofed' roofs/terraces pond, and standing water finds every weakness — falls to outlets are part of the design, not the screed contractor's guess.
2. Discontinuous DPC / no upturns. A broken DPC lets rising damp bypass it; membranes with no/short upturns at parapets and walls leak at the very junctions they exist to protect.
3. Unsealed pipe penetrations. The single commonest sunken-slab/toilet leak — every penetration must be sleeved and sealed before filling.
4. No flood/pond test before covering. Covering un-tested waterproofing converts a cheap fix into a demolition; the pre-cover flood test is mandatory practice.
5. Membrane punctured by follow-on trades. Unprotected membranes are routinely holed by subsequent work — protect immediately.
IS 3067 is old (1988) and reaffirmed; waterproofing technology has advanced enormously (APP/SBS membranes, crystalline, PU/acrylic liquid-applied, integral admixtures) but the failure mode has not changed — buildings leak at *junctions, terminations, penetrations and where water ponds*, almost never in the field of a correctly-laid membrane. So IS 3067's emphasis on slope, continuity, upturns/terminations, penetration sealing and protection is exactly the right mental model regardless of which modern system is used.
The practitioner contract: design the falls and outlets, specify continuous DPC and adequate upturns, sleeve-and-seal every penetration, flood-test before covering, and protect the membrane from follow-on trades. Choose the below-grade strategy by the water table/hydrostatic head (tanking vs water-resistant concrete + drainage, read with IS 3370). The expensive lesson on every project: a premium membrane installed with poor detailing leaks; an ordinary system with disciplined detailing and a flood test does not.
| Parameter | IS Value | International | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basement Waterproofing Layers (for 1.5m water head) | 3 layers of bitumen felt (as per Table 1). | Not specified prescriptively. A suitable system (Type A, B, or C) must be designed to achieve a pre-defined performance grade. | BS 8102:2022 |
| Concrete W/C Ratio (for Integral Waterproofing) | Not to exceed 0.45. | Typically ≤0.40 to ≤0.45, often with stricter controls and requirements for specific admixtures to ensure low permeability. | ACI 515.2R-13 |
| Plastic Sheet DPC Thickness | 250 microns (1000 gauge) for polyethylene sheet. | Generally 300 microns (1200 gauge) or greater, and must conform to specific material standards like BS 6515 or BS EN 14909. | UK Building Practice / BS Standards |
| Bitumen Felt Lap Joint Width | 100 mm for both side and end laps. | Typically 75-100 mm for side laps and a larger 150 mm for end laps on roofing felts to improve water shedding. | BS 6229:2018 |
| Design Philosophy for Basements | Prescriptive, based on water head depth and providing a 'recipe' of materials and layers. | Performance-based and risk-assessed, considering soil, water table, and building's intended use to select a protection 'Type'. | BS 8102:2022 |
| Application Temperature (Hot Bitumen, e.g. 85/25) | 165-175 °C. | Varies by specific asphalt type, but generally within a 177-204 °C (350-400 °F) range for similar materials. | ACI 515.2R-13 |