InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 2911 Part 1/Sec 2 : 2010Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations - Concrete piles - Driven cast in-situ piles

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 1997-1 · BS 8004 · ACI 336.3R
CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeBIMGeotechnical · Soil and Foundation
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues6InternationalEngineer's NotesTablesFAQ4RelatedQA/QCNew

IS 2911:2010 Part 1/Sec 2 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for design and construction of pile foundations - concrete piles - driven cast in-situ piles. This standard (Part 1, Section 2 of IS 2911) outlines the code of practice for the design and construction of driven cast-in-situ concrete piles. It covers design principles for calculating pile capacity, material specifications for concrete and steel, and detailed workmanship guidelines for installation and concreting.

Provides guidelines for the design and construction of driven cast in-situ concrete piles.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Frequently Used
Domain
Geotechnical — Soil and Foundation
Type
Code of Practice
Amendments
Amendment 1 (August 2013)
International equivalents
EN 1997-1:2004 + EN 1536:2010 · European Committee for Standardization (CEN), EuropeBS 8004:2015+A1:2020 · British Standards Institution (BSI), United KingdomACI 336.3R-14 · American Concrete Institute (ACI), USAAS 2159:2009 · Standards Australia, Australia
Typically used with
IS 456IS 1080IS 1498IS 1892IS 2131
Also on InfraLens for IS 2911
6Key values2Tables4QA/QC templates1Handbook topics1Knowledge articles4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! Under-reamed piles are highly effective in expansive soils to counteract heave due to moisture changes.
! Ensure proper cleaning of the borehole base and under-reamed bulbs using a bucket auger before placing concrete.
! If high groundwater table is encountered, concrete must be placed using a tremie pipe to prevent cement wash-out and segregation.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 5MaterialsCl. 6.2Spacing of PilesCl. 6.3Bearing CapacityCl. 7Structural DesignCl. 8Construction
Pulled from IS 2911:2010. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
Updates & Amendments1 amendment
Amendment 1 (August 2013)
Consolidated list per BIS. For the text of each amendment, refer to the BIS portal link above.
concretesteelcement

Engineer's Notes

In Practice — Editorial Commentary
When IS 2911 Part 1 Section 2 is your governing code

IS 2911 (Part 1, Section 2) specifies the design and construction of pile foundations — concrete piles (bored cast-in-situ) — the most widely used pile type in Indian deep foundation practice. A bored cast-in-situ pile is constructed by drilling a hole using rotary or auger boring, lowering the reinforcement cage, and concreting in-place using tremie or direct pour.

Use IS 2911 Part 1 Section 2 when designing: - Pile foundations for buildings (multi-storey > 4 floors typically need piles unless on rock) - Bridge foundations (bored piles for piers and abutments) - Industrial structures (silo, tank, compressor) - Marine / waterfront structures (jetty, dock) - Foundations on soft / variable soils where shallow foundation isn't viable - Heavy loads (storage tanks, plant equipment, transformer) - Sites with deep founding stratum (bored piles can reach 30-40+ m depths)

IS 2911 has multiple Parts and Sections covering different pile types: - Part 1 / Section 1 — driven cast-in-situ concrete piles - Part 1 / Section 2 — bored cast-in-situ concrete piles (this code) - Part 1 / Section 3 — driven precast concrete piles - Part 1 / Section 4 — bored precast concrete piles - Part 2 — timber piles - Part 3 — under-reamed piles - Part 4 (1985) — load test on piles (IS 2911 Part 4:1985)

Bored cast-in-situ pile is the dominant choice in urban India because: - Quiet (no driving noise/vibration; suitable for crowded sites) - Adaptable depth (can extend to refusal stratum) - Variable diameter (300 mm to 3000 mm+) - Can handle adjacent old structures without inducing settlement - Soil samples recoverable during boring (validate soil report)

Pile capacity calculation

Total ultimate capacity:

Q_u = Q_b (end bearing) + Q_s (skin friction) − W (pile weight)

End bearing (Q_b): - Q_b = A_b × q_b - A_b = pile cross-sectional area at toe - q_b = ultimate end bearing pressure (per soil at toe) - Cohesive soil (clay): q_b = N_c × c_u (with N_c = 9 for deep foundations) - Granular soil (sand): q_b = σ'_v × N_q (where σ'_v = effective overburden, N_q from Berezantzev / Janbu) - Rock socket: q_b = depending on rock UCS + socket length

Skin friction (Q_s): - Q_s = Σ (perimeter × layer thickness × f_s) over all soil layers - Cohesive: f_s = α × c_u (α = 0.4-0.6 typical) - Granular: f_s = K × σ'_v × tan δ (K = 0.7-1.0 for bored, δ ≈ 2/3 × φ) - Rock socket: f_s = function of rock UCS + roughness

Allowable capacity: - Q_safe = Q_u / FS - FS = 2.5 (load test verified) or 3.0 (calculation only, no test)

Settlement: - Elastic compression: P × L / (A × E_p) - Soil compression at pile toe: per soil compressibility - Group effect: pile group settles more than single pile (settlement reduction factor < 1)

Pile dimensions (typical): - Diameter: 300 mm (small residential), 450-600 mm (typical building), 750-1000 mm (heavy buildings, bridges), 1200-3000 mm (mega projects) - Length: 5-30 m typical; can reach 50-60 m for special cases - Reinforcement: 1-2 % of cross-sectional area (longitudinal); ties at 150-300 mm spacing

Cover to reinforcement: - Underground (soil contact): 75 mm minimum (per IS 456 Clause 26.4) - For aggressive soil (chloride / sulphate): 75-100 mm - For very aggressive (marine, sewage): 100-125 mm

Concrete mix: - Grade: M25 minimum; M30-M40 typical for routine; M50+ for critical - Slump: 150-200 mm (high-flow for tremie concreting) - Cement content: ≥ 400 kg/m³ for tremie - Mix design (IS 10262:2019) with HRWR (IS 9103:1999)

Construction sequence

Bored pile construction (with bentonite slurry support):

1. Boring: Rotary drill rig with bucket / auger; drilling under bentonite slurry support (for unstable / saturated soil) OR dry boring (for stable cohesive soil above water table). 2. Slurry stabilisation: Bentonite slurry (4-6 % concentration; density 1.05-1.10 g/cm³) maintains hydrostatic pressure to prevent borehole collapse. 3. Toe cleaning: After reaching design depth, slurry is air-lifted / circulated to remove sediment from toe. 4. Reinforcement cage: Pre-fabricated cage (longitudinal bars + ties + spacers) lowered into borehole. 5. Tremie concreting: - Tremie pipe (140-200 mm dia) lowered to within 100-200 mm of toe - Concrete pumped through tremie; displaces bentonite from bottom up - Tremie tip kept ≥ 1 m below concrete surface throughout pour - Continuous pour (no interruption) until pile concreted to design top level + 1 m extra (cut off later) 6. Pile head treatment: Cut excess concrete + chip to expose clean reinforcement for connection to pile cap.

Alternative: dry boring (no slurry): - For stable cohesive soils above water table - Auger borehole + lower casing temporarily for safety - Inspect borehole; lower cage; concrete by direct pour - Faster + cheaper but limited applicability

Casing methods (alternative to bentonite): - Permanent steel casing: in soft soils + at top section to prevent surface caving - Temporary casing: pulled out as concrete is poured - Used where bentonite contamination is unacceptable or for short piles

Quality control: - Boring depth verification by weighted measuring tape after toe cleaning - Slurry quality: viscosity (Marsh funnel 30-50 sec), density (1.05-1.10 g/cm³), sand content (≤ 4 %) - Cage centring: spacers at 1-2 m intervals - Concrete: slump 150-200 mm verified each truck; cube tests - Tremie tip immersion: monitor continuously

Pile testing post-construction: - Integrity test (PIT — Pulse Induction Test): low-strain test on 100 % of piles; cheap (₹500-1500 per pile); detects necking, voids, cold joints in upper sections. - Load test (IS 2911 Part 4:1985): - Initial load test on sacrificial pile to ≥ 2.5 × design load (verifies design) - Routine load tests on 0.5-2 % of piles to 1.5 × design load (verifies installation) - Cross-hole sonic logging (CSL): between embedded steel tubes; detects internal defects in pile body.

Companion codes (must pair with)
  • IS 2911 Part 1 Section 1 — driven cast-in-situ concrete piles.
  • IS 2911 Part 1 Section 3 — driven precast concrete piles.
  • IS 2911 Part 1 Section 4 — bored precast concrete piles.
  • IS 2911 Part 2 — timber piles.
  • IS 2911 Part 3 — under-reamed piles.
  • IS 2911 Part 4:1985 — load test on piles.
  • IS 456:2000 — RCC code (pile concrete + reinforcement design).
  • IS 1786:2008 — high-strength deformed reinforcement.
  • IS 8112:1989 / IS 12269:2013 — cement standards.
  • IS 10262:2019 — concrete mix design.
  • IS 9103:1999 — admixtures (HRWR for tremie).
  • IS 383:2016 — aggregates.
  • IS 2131:1981 — Standard Penetration Test (provides N-value for capacity calculation).
  • IS 2720 Part 4:1985 — soil grain-size analysis.
  • IS 2720 Part 10:1991 — UCS for cohesive soils.
  • IS 1888:1982 — plate load test (alternative for shallow founding).
  • IS 6403:1981 — bearing capacity calculation methods.
  • IS 1893 Part 1:2016 — earthquake resistant design (pile group response).
  • IS 9556:1980 — diaphragm walls (related deep-foundation tech).
  • IS 16700:2017 — tall building design (typically pile-founded).
Common pitfalls / what reviewers flag

1. Insufficient toe cleaning. Sediment / soft material at toe → low end bearing → settlement under load. De-sand slurry + verify by sounding before concreting. 2. Tremie tip pulled out of concrete. Bentonite re-enters; concrete contaminated; pile defective. Maintain ≥ 1 m immersion throughout pour. 3. Concrete mix wrong (low slump). Tremie clogs; pile interrupted; cold joint. Use 150-200 mm slump with HRWR. 4. Cage placed off-centre. Cover insufficient on one side; corrosion + structural defect. Use spacers at 1-2 m intervals. 5. Single-source cement check skipped. Cement quality drift causes pile concrete strength issues. Routine test per delivery. 6. No integrity test (PIT). Defects discovered only when pile fails load test (at high cost) or in service. PIT all piles cheaply. 7. Inadequate load test programme. Initial test at ≥ 2.5× design load on sacrificial pile + routine tests on 0.5-2 % of production piles. Skipping = no verification. 8. Group effect ignored in pile group design. Group capacity < n × single-pile capacity (usually 0.7-0.85 n × single); without group reduction, design is optimistic. 9. No interaction with adjacent existing structures. Pile installation can cause settlement / heave in adjacent building. Pre-construction survey + monitoring. 10. Permanent casing pulled out without complete concrete coverage. Local necking; structural defect. Pull casing only when concrete level is ≥ 1 m above casing bottom. 11. Pile cap design ignores actual pile spacing tolerance. Piles are typically off-design by 75-150 mm; pile cap design must accommodate. 12. No record of pile installation log. No traceability when problem emerges. Per pile: date, depth, cage details, concrete cubes, slump, integrity test. 13. Verticality drift ignored. > 1.5 % (1:65) drift can compromise capacity. Monitor verticality during boring; reject if excessive. 14. Fresh concrete left in tremie pipe between batches. Hardens; clogs; abandoned. Continuous concrete supply mandatory.

Where it sits in foundation engineering

Pile foundation project cascade (typical building):

1. Geotechnical investigation — boreholes (1 per 100-200 m² of building footprint, minimum 3); SPT continuous; soil samples; UCS / triaxial / consolidation tests. 2. Soil profile analysis — identify founding stratum (typically dense sand or stiff clay at depth). 3. Pile type selection: - Bored cast-in-situ (this code): default urban choice - Driven (Sec 1, 3): when noise/vibration acceptable + soil suitable - Under-reamed (Part 3): expansive soils, low cost residential 4. Pile design (IS 2911 Part 1 Sec 2:2010): - Capacity per soil profile (skin friction + end bearing) - Diameter + length per loads - Reinforcement per moment + axial loads - Group design + pile cap 5. Pile testing programme: - Initial load test (IS 2911 Part 4:1985) on sacrificial pile - Routine load tests during production - PIT on all piles 6. Construction sequence: - Pre-bore pilot holes if needed for utility / verticality verification - Production piling per design + spec - Quality records per pile 7. Acceptance: - Load test results meet IS 2911 Part 4 acceptance criteria - Integrity tests show no defects - Pile cap construction commences

Modern enhancements: - Grouted pile (post-grouting at toe to enhance end bearing) - Bi-directional load test (Osterberg cell at toe; cheaper than full kentledge for very heavy loads) - Ultra-deep piles (60+ m for offshore + ultra-tall buildings) - Composite piles (steel + concrete combinations)

IS 2911 Part 1 Section 2 is one of the most-used Indian foundation codes — bored cast-in-situ piles support most of India's modern urban construction.

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 1997-1:2004 + EN 1536:2010European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Europe
HighCurrent
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules & EN 1536: Execution of special geotechnical works - Bored piles
EN 1997-1 covers design principles while EN 1536 covers execution, together matching the IS code's scope.
BS 8004:2015+A1:2020British Standards Institution (BSI), United Kingdom
HighCurrent
Code of practice for foundations
Provides comprehensive guidance on the design and construction of all pile types, including bored cast-in-situ.
ACI 336.3R-14American Concrete Institute (ACI), USA
HighCurrent
Report on Design and Construction of Drilled Piers
Directly addresses the design and construction of drilled piers, the US term for bored cast-in-situ piles.
AS 2159:2009Standards Australia, Australia
MediumCurrent
Piling - Design and installation
Covers the entire piling process, with significant overlap on design and installation of bored piles.
Key Differences
≠IS 2911 primarily uses a working stress design (WSD) approach with a single global factor of safety (typically 2.5), whereas Eurocode 7 and other modern standards use a Limit State Design (LSD) approach with separate partial factors on actions (loads) and resistances (ground/material strength).
≠IS 2911 specifies a minimum longitudinal reinforcement of 0.4% of the pile's gross cross-sectional area. In contrast, codes like BS 8004 vary the minimum reinforcement based on design actions (e.g., 0.5% for piles resisting bending, potentially less for pure compression).
≠The criteria for determining safe load from a static load test are explicitly defined in IS 2911 (Part 4), often based on settlement limits (e.g., settlement of 12 mm or 2% of pile diameter). International codes like Eurocode 7 provide a framework for interpretation but allow for various accepted methods (e.g., Chin-Kondner extrapolation, 0.1D method).
≠IS 2911 specifies a relatively narrow concrete slump range of 150-180 mm for tremie concrete. International execution standards like EN 1536 are more flexible, using slump classes (e.g., S4: 160-210 mm) and explicitly accommodating self-compacting concrete (SCC) with flow criteria.
Key Similarities
≈All standards are fundamentally based on the principle that the ultimate pile capacity is the sum of end bearing resistance and skin friction resistance (Qu = Qp + Qs).
≈There is a universal emphasis across all codes on the critical importance of a comprehensive geotechnical investigation as the basis for a safe and economical pile foundation design.
≈The descriptions of construction methodologies are highly consistent, including the sequence of boring, use of temporary casing or stabilizing fluids (bentonite/polymer), placement of reinforcement cages, and concreting from the bottom up using a tremie pipe to ensure concrete integrity.
≈All modern standards, including IS 2911, recommend or mandate non-destructive integrity testing (e.g., low-strain sonic integrity, cross-hole sonic logging) to verify the as-built quality of the piles and check for defects.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Design Safety ApproachWorking Stress Design with global Factor of Safety (typically 2.5 on ultimate load).Limit State Design with partial factors on loads and resistances (e.g., γ_R = 1.4 for end bearing).EN 1997-1
Minimum Concrete Cover (to main bars)60 mm75 mm (for piles cast directly against soil)BS 8004:2015
Minimum Centre-to-Centre Pile Spacing3 x Pile Diameter3 x Pile Diameter is a commonly recommended minimum spacing.ACI 336.3R-14
Concrete Slump (for tremie placement)150 mm to 180 mmTypically Class S4 (160 mm to 210 mm) or higher workability classes.EN 1536:2010
Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement0.4% of gross cross-sectional area0.5% for piles resisting bending moments.BS 8004:2015
Positional Tolerance (at cut-off level)75 mm in any direction.75 mm for single piles or piles in a two-pile group.EN 1536:2010
Cut-off Level Tolerance (vertical)+25 mm / -75 mm± 50 mmEN 1536:2010
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values6

Quick Reference Values
ratio of under ream to shaft diameter2 to 3 (usually 2.5)
minimum spacing between piles2 times under-ream diameter (2Du)
minimum grade of concreteM 20
minimum longitudinal reinforcement0.4 percent of the gross cross-sectional area of the pile shaft
minimum clear cover to longitudinal reinforcement40 mm
vertical spacing between two under reams1.25 to 1.5 times the under-ream diameter
Key Formulas
Qu = Ap * Nc * cp + α * c * As + ... (Static formula for ultimate bearing capacity of under-reamed pile in clay)
Safe Load = Ultimate Bearing Capacity / Factor of Safety (Usually 2.5)

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Safe Load for Vertical Bored Cast in Situ Under-Reamed Piles in Cohesive Soils
Table 2 - Safe Load for Vertical Bored Cast in Situ Under-Reamed Piles in Sandy Soils
Key Clauses
Clause 5 - Materials
Clause 6.2 - Spacing of Piles
Clause 6.3 - Bearing Capacity
Clause 7 - Structural Design
Clause 8 - Construction

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 1080:1985Code of Practice For Design And Construction ...
→
IS 1498:1970Classification and identification of soils fo...
→
IS 1892:1979Code of practice for site investigations for ...
→
IS 2131:1981Method for standard penetration test for soil...
→
Handbook & Design Rules
Handbook Topics
📖Pile Bearing Capacity (IS 2911)
→
Articles & Guides
📖Foundation Selection Guide — Isolated, Combined, Raft, Pile
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the standard ratio of under-ream diameter to shaft diameter?+
The ratio is normally 2 to 3, but generally a value of 2.5 is used in practice.
What is the minimum spacing allowed between two under-reamed piles?+
The minimum spacing should be 2 times the under-ream diameter (2Du).
What is the minimum longitudinal reinforcement required for an under-reamed pile?+
Minimum 0.4 percent of the gross cross-sectional area of the pile shaft.
How many bulbs can an under-reamed pile have?+
They can be single or multi-under-reamed (typically up to two or three bulbs) depending on load requirements and soil strata.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

Code-Specific Templates for IS 2911
📝
Piling Method Statement
form
Excel / PDF
📐
Geotechnical ITP
plan
Excel / PDF
📋
Pile Driving / Boring Log
register
Excel / PDF
📝
Piling Method Statement
form
Excel / PDF