InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 6403 : 1981Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 1997-1 · BS 8004 · CFEM 4th Edition
CurrentEssentialCode of PracticeBIMGeotechnical · Soil and Foundation
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues5InternationalTablesFAQ4RelatedQA/QCNew

IS 6403:1981 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This code provides a methodology for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of soils under shallow foundations based on shear failure criteria. It covers both general and local shear failure conditions and includes modifying factors for foundation shape, depth, load inclination, and the effect of the water table. The code also gives guidance on estimating bearing capacity from in-situ tests like SPT and plate load tests.

Provides methods and guidelines for calculating the ultimate and safe bearing capacity of shallow foundations on various types of soils.

Quick Reference — Top IS 6403:1981 Values

Key bearing capacity factors, shape/depth/inclination factors, settlement limits, and field test correlations for shallow foundations.

✓ Verified 2026-04-27
ReferenceValueClause
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nc (φ=0°)— For general shear failure in cohesive soils (undrained).5.14Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nq (φ=0°)— For general shear failure in cohesive soils (undrained).1.0Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nγ (φ=0°)— For general shear failure in cohesive soils (undrained).0.0Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nc (φ=30°)— For general shear failure.30.1Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nq (φ=30°)— For general shear failure.18.4Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Bearing Capacity Factor, Nγ (φ=30°)— For general shear failure.22.4Cl. 5.1.2 (Table 1)
Shape Factor, sc (Square/Circle)1.3Cl. 5.1.3 (Table 3)
Shape Factor, sq (Square/Circle)1.2Cl. 5.1.3 (Table 3)
Shape Factor, sγ (Square)0.8Cl. 5.1.3 (Table 3)
Depth Factor, dq = dγ (for φ > 10°)— D=depth, B=width of footing.1 + 0.1(D/B)tan(45+φ/2)Cl. 5.1.3
Inclination Factor, ic = iq— α is load inclination from vertical in degrees.(1 - α/90)²Cl. 5.1.3
Inclination Factor, iγ— α is load inclination, φ is friction angle (both in degrees).(1 - α/φ)²Cl. 5.1.3
Mobilized Cohesion (Local Shear)— Use c' and φ' in BC equations for local shear failure.c' = (2/3)cCl. 6.1
Mobilized Friction (Local Shear)— Use c' and φ' in BC equations for local shear failure.tan(φ') = (2/3)tan(φ)Cl. 6.1
Water Table Correction Factor, W'— Applied to γ term if water table is at or above footing base.0.5Cl. 5.1.4
Max Settlement (Isolated, RC, Sand)50 mmCl. 8.2 (Table 2)
Max Settlement (Isolated, RC, Clay)75 mmCl. 8.2 (Table 2)
Max Settlement (Raft, RC, Sand)75 mmCl. 8.2 (Table 2)
Max Settlement (Raft, RC, Clay)100 mmCl. 8.2 (Table 2)
Max Differential Settlement (Sand)— L is c/c distance between columns or length of deflected part.L/300 or 25 mmCl. 8.2 (Table 2)
Settlement from PLT (Clay)— Sf/Sp: foundation/plate settlement; Bf/Bp: foundation/plate width.Sf/Sp = Bf/BpCl. 9.1.4
Settlement from PLT (Sand)— Bf and Bp are foundation and plate widths in metres.Sf = Sp * [(Bf(Bp+0.3))/(Bp(Bf+0.3))]²Cl. 9.1.4
⚠ Verify against the latest BIS/IRC publication and project specifications. Amendment Slips may modify values.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Essential
Domain
Geotechnical — Soil and Foundation
Type
Code of Practice
Amendments
Amendment 1 (March 1987); Amendment 2 (June 1993); Amendment 3 (November 1997)
International equivalents
EN 1997-1:2004 · CEN (European Union)BS 8004:2015+A1:2020 · BSI (United Kingdom)CFEM 4th Edition · CGS (Canada)AASHTO LRFD 9th Edition · AASHTO (US)
Typically used with
IS 1904IS 2131IS 1888IS 2809
Also on InfraLens for IS 6403
5Key values2Tables2QA/QC templates4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! The position of the water table is critical; its effect on the soil's unit weight in the second and third terms of the bearing capacity equation must be carefully calculated.
! A distinction must be made between general shear failure (for dense/stiff soils) and local shear failure (for loose/soft soils), as the latter requires modifying the soil's shear strength parameters (c and φ).
! The calculated safe bearing capacity (after applying a factor of safety) must be cross-checked against the allowable bearing pressure based on settlement criteria, and the lower of the two values should be adopted for design.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 5.1General Shear Failure EquationCl. 6Effect of Water TableCl. 7Bearing Capacity of Stratified SoilsCl. 9Bearing Capacity from In-situ Tests (SPT/Plate Load Test)
Pulled from IS 6403:1981. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
Updates & Amendments3 amendments
Amendment 1 (March 1987)
Amendment 2 (June 1993)
Amendment 3 (November 1997)
Consolidated list per BIS. For the text of each amendment, refer to the BIS portal link above.
soilfoundations

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 1997-1:2004CEN (European Union)
HighCurrent
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules
Both standards provide methodologies for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations.
BS 8004:2015+A1:2020BSI (United Kingdom)
HighCurrent
Code of practice for foundations
Provides comprehensive guidance on the design of foundations, including bearing capacity calculations similar to IS 6403.
CFEM 4th EditionCGS (Canada)
MediumCurrent
Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual
A comprehensive manual covering all aspects of foundation engineering, with a detailed section on bearing capacity.
AASHTO LRFD 9th EditionAASHTO (US)
MediumCurrent
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Section 10: Foundations
Focuses on bridge foundations using a limit state design (LRFD) approach, but the core bearing capacity theory is comparable.
Key Differences
≠Design Philosophy: IS 6403 uses a global Factor of Safety (FoS) approach (e.g., FoS of 2.5-3.0), a type of allowable stress design. In contrast, Eurocode 7 (EN 1997-1) mandates a Limit State Design (LSD) approach, applying partial factors of safety to loads, material properties, and/or resistance separately.
≠Bearing Capacity Factor Nγ: IS 6403 adopts Nγ values based on Vesic's theory. EN 1997-1 provides an analytical expression for Nγ based on the theory of Caquot and Kérisel (Nγ = 2(Nq-1)tan(φ')). This results in different Nγ values for the same friction angle (φ').
≠Water Table Correction: IS 6403 applies a single correction factor, 'Rw', to modify the unit weight in the surcharge and self-weight terms of the bearing capacity equation. EN 1997-1 does not use a simplified factor; instead, it requires direct calculation of effective stresses and pore water pressures at all points, which is a more fundamental approach.
≠Shape and Depth Factors: The mathematical expressions for shape factors (s_c, s_q, s_γ) and depth factors (d_c, d_q, d_γ) differ between the two codes. For example, for a square footing, IS 6403 specifies s_q = 1.2, whereas EN 1997-1 calculates it as s_q = 1 + sin(φ'), leading to different results.
Key Similarities
≈General Bearing Capacity Equation: Both standards are fundamentally based on Terzaghi's general bearing capacity theory, using a three-term equation to sum the contributions from cohesion (c), surcharge (q), and soil self-weight (γ).
≈Handling of Eccentric Loading: Both IS 6403 and EN 1997-1 use the same effective area method (Meyerhof's method) to handle eccentric loads. The foundation dimensions are reduced by twice the eccentricity (B' = B - 2e_B, L' = L - 2e_L) and the analysis is performed using these effective dimensions.
≈Undrained Analysis (φ=0): For saturated clays under short-term loading (undrained condition, φ=0), both codes simplify the bearing capacity equation. Both recognize that N_q becomes 1.0 and N_γ becomes 0, and use a value for N_c of π+2 (approximately 5.14) for a strip footing.
≈Inclusion of Modifying Factors: Both codes acknowledge that the basic bearing capacity equation for a strip footing on the surface must be modified for real-world conditions. Both include and apply factors for foundation shape, embedment depth, and load inclination.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Design Safety ApproachGlobal Factor of Safety (typically 2.5 to 3.0)Partial Factors of Safety (e.g., γ_R,v = 1.4 on bearing resistance for Design Approach 1)EN 1997-1
Bearing Factor Nq (for φ=30°)18.418.4 (from formula e^(π tanφ) tan²(45+φ/2))EN 1997-1
Bearing Factor Nγ (for φ=30°)22.4 (from Vesic)20.1 (from formula 2(Nq-1)tanφ)EN 1997-1
Shape Factor s_q (Square Footing, φ=30°)1.2 (for φ>10°)1.5 (from formula 1 + sinφ)EN 1997-1
Shape Factor s_γ (Square Footing)0.80.7 (from formula 1 - 0.3 B'/L')EN 1997-1
Treatment of Eccentricity 'e'Use effective width B' = B - 2eUse effective width B' = B - 2eEN 1997-1
Inclination Factor i_q (Load Inclination α)i_q = (1 - α/90°)^2i_q = (1 - H/(V+A'c'cotφ'))^m (more complex)EN 1997-1
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values5

Quick Reference Values
Minimum Factor of Safety for bearing capacity2.5
Permissible total settlement for isolated foundations on sand50 mm
Permissible total settlement for isolated foundations on clay75 mm
Permissible total settlement for rafts on sand75 mm
Permissible total settlement for rafts on clay100 mm
Key Formulas
q_net_ultimate = c Nc sc dc ic + q (Nq-1) sq dq iq + 0.5 B γ Nγ sγ dγ iγ — Net ultimate bearing capacity for general shear failure

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Bearing Capacity Factors (Nc, Nq, Nγ)
Table 2 - Shape, Depth and Inclination Factors
Key Clauses
Clause 5.1 - General Shear Failure Equation
Clause 6 - Effect of Water Table
Clause 7 - Bearing Capacity of Stratified Soils
Clause 9 - Bearing Capacity from In-situ Tests (SPT/Plate Load Test)

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 1904:1986Code of practice for design and construction ...
→
IS 2131:1981Method for standard penetration test for soil...
→
IS 1888:1982Method of load test on soils for shallow foun...
→
IS 2809:1972Glossary of terms and symbols relating to soi...
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the recommended Factor of Safety for bearing capacity?+
A minimum factor of safety of 2.5 is recommended, though a value of 3 is commonly used in practice (Clause 5.2).
How does the water table affect bearing capacity?+
It reduces bearing capacity by reducing the effective unit weight of the soil in the terms involving width (B) and surcharge (q). Clause 6 provides the water table correction factors (W' and W).
Where do I find the bearing capacity factors Nc, Nq, and Nγ?+
They are provided in Table 1 of the code, corresponding to the soil's angle of shearing resistance (φ).
When should local shear failure be considered?+
For loose sands and soft clays. For this case, modified shear strength parameters c' = (2/3)c and tan φ' = (2/3)tan φ should be used in the general bearing capacity equation (Clause 5.1.1.2).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

Code-Specific Templates for IS 6403
✅
Foundation (Footing/Raft) Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
📊
SPT (Standard Penetration Test) Report
test-report
Excel / PDF