InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 1199 Part 7 : 2018Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete - Part 7: Determination of the slump

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
ASTM C143 / C143M · EN 12350-2 · BS EN 12350-2
CurrentEssentialTesting MethodMaterials Science · Testing Methods and Quality Control
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues9InternationalEngineer's NotesTablesFAQ4RelatedQA/QCNew

IS 1199:2018 Part 7 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for methods of sampling and analysis of concrete - part 7: determination of the slump. This standard specifies the procedure for determining the workability and consistency of fresh concrete using the slump cone test. It is universally used by engineers on construction sites to verify that delivered concrete has the specified fluidity before it is placed.

Specifies the method for determining the slump of fresh concrete using a slump cone.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Essential
Domain
Materials Science — Testing Methods and Quality Control
Type
Testing Method
International equivalents
ASTM C143 / C143M-22 · ASTM International (US)EN 12350-2:2019 · CEN (European Committee for Standardization)BS EN 12350-2:2019 · BSI (UK)ISO 1920-2:2016 · ISO (International)
Typically used with
IS 456IS 11991IS 10262
Also on InfraLens for IS 1199
9Key values5QA/QC templates4FAQs
Practical Notes
! The slump measurement is taken from the highest point of the slumped concrete to the underside of the tamping rod placed over the mould.
! If the concrete shears (one half slides down along an inclined plane) or collapses completely laterally, the test is invalid and must be repeated from the same batch.
! The base plate must be placed on a level, rigid, and horizontal surface free from vibrations.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 4ApparatusCl. 5Test ProcedureCl. 6Test Result and MeasurementCl. 7Test Report
Pulled from IS 1199:2018. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
concretefresh concretecement

Engineer's Notes

In Practice — Editorial Commentary
When IS 1199 Part 7 is your governing code

IS 1199 (Part 7) specifies the method of sampling and analysis of fresh concrete — analysis of fresh concrete (washing-out / washout method). The IS 1199 multi-part series is the comprehensive Indian standard for fresh concrete testing.

The IS 1199:2018 series: - Part 1: Sampling methods + slump test (most common) - Part 2: Determination of density of fresh concrete - Part 3: Vee-bee consistometer (workability) - Part 4: Compacting factor test (workability) - Part 5: Flow test (high-flow concrete) - Part 6: Determination of bleeding - Part 7 (this code): Analysis of fresh concrete (cement content + w/c ratio determination by washing) - Part 8: Determination of air content

Use IS 1199 Part 7 when: - Verifying actual cement content in delivered concrete - Forensic investigation of low-strength concrete (was correct cement dosed?) - Audit / dispute resolution on RMC quality - Mix-design vs delivered-mix validation - Quality-control benchmark for in-house RMC plant

The washout method separates fresh concrete into its components (cement + water + aggregate) by washing — directly verifies cement content per cubic metre and water content per cubic metre.

The washout test procedure

1. Sample fresh concrete per IS 1199 Part 1:2018 — minimum 5-10 kg from point of placement. 2. Mass measurement — record total mass of fresh sample + container. 3. Initial sieving — pass through 4.75 mm sieve under running water; collect fines (cement + sand) + retain coarse aggregate. 4. Coarse aggregate analysis — wash, oven-dry, weigh; gives coarse aggregate content. 5. Fine fraction (cement + sand) analysis — separate cement from sand by: - Settling: cement settles slower than sand; decant - Filtration: through 75 µm sieve under water - Centrifuging: for precise separation 6. Cement content — dried mass of cement fraction × correction factor 7. Water content — by mass balance: total mass − (coarse aggregate + cement + sand) 8. Calculations: - Cement content (kg/m³) = mass of cement / volume of concrete sample - Water content (kg/m³) = mass of water / volume - w/c ratio = water / cement - Aggregate-cement ratio

Volume measurement: by direct displacement or computed from density × mass.

Reporting: - Cement content (kg/m³) - Water content (kg/m³) - w/c ratio - Aggregate proportions (coarse + fine) - Comparison with design mix - Deviation from design (acceptable: ±5 % of cement content, ±3 % of w/c)

Reference values you'll actually use

Acceptance criteria (typical for project audit): - Cement content within ±5 % of design value - Water content within ±3 % of design - w/c ratio within ±0.05 of design

Typical mix ratios (M30 example): - Cement: 380 kg/m³ - Water: 175 kg/m³ (w/c = 0.46) - Fine aggregate: 700 kg/m³ - Coarse aggregate (20 mm): 1100 kg/m³ - Total: ~2355 kg/m³ (concrete density)

Washout result should match within tolerance.

When to run IS 1199 Part 7: - Source qualification of new RMC supplier - Routine audit (per 1000 m³ or per supplier change) - Investigation of low cube strength - Spot-check on delivered batches - Cross-validation against batching plant records

Test cost (typical 2026): - ₹3000-8000 per test (NABL lab) - Higher than routine cube test (which is ~₹500); lower than full mix-design verification

Test cadence (recommended for QC): - Source qualification: 3-5 tests on representative samples - Routine: 1 per 500-1000 m³ for high-volume projects; per supplier change - Investigation: as needed when problem suspected

Compared to other QC methods: - Cube strength (IS 516 Part 1 Sec 1:2021): indirect — measures outcome (strength), not inputs (cement, water) - Slump (IS 1199 Part 1:2018): workability, indirect indication of w/c - Density (IS 1199 Part 2:2018): indirect indication of mix proportions - Washout (this code, Part 7): direct measurement of cement + water + aggregate

Washout is the most rigorous + most expensive on-site QC; usually reserved for source qualification + dispute resolution.

Companion codes (must pair with)
  • IS 1199 Parts 1-8 — fresh concrete sampling + testing series.
  • IS 1199 Part 1:2018 — sampling + slump (most common).
  • IS 1199 Part 2:2018 — fresh concrete density.
  • IS 516 Part 1:2021 — compressive strength on cubes.
  • IS 456:2000 — RCC code.
  • IS 10262:2019 — concrete mix design.
  • IS 4926:2003 — Ready-Mixed Concrete specification.
  • IS 4925:2004 — concrete batching plant specification.
  • IS 8112:1989 / IS 12269:2013 — cement standards.
  • IS 383:2016 — aggregates.
  • IS 9103:1999 — admixtures (modify washout interpretation slightly).
  • ASTM C172 — international counterpart for fresh concrete sampling.
  • ASTM C173 / C231 — air content.
Common pitfalls / what reviewers flag

1. Sample too small. Affects accuracy of separation; especially for coarse aggregate. Use ≥ 5-10 kg sample. 2. Sample from mixer outlet only. Workability + segregation may differ at placement. Sample from point of placement. 3. Cement-sand separation incomplete. Some cement particles trapped in sand fraction; cement reads low. Use centrifuge or longer settling. 4. Water content by mass balance imprecise. Small errors compound; can't detect ± 5 % water variation reliably. Direct water measurement (pre-weigh sample, dry and re-weigh) more accurate. 5. Plant operator pre-warned. Knowing audit happening, plant produces good batch (Hawthorne effect). Random / unannounced audit. 6. Single test extrapolated. One test result doesn't characterise plant; need ≥ 3 samples for meaningful average. 7. No comparison to plant batching record. Result without context; can't identify drift. Compare to supplier's batch print + design mix. 8. Test in lab, days after sample taken. Concrete hardens; impossible to wash. Test must be on FRESH concrete within hours. 9. No written audit protocol. Ad-hoc test; results disputed. Document procedure + acceptance + reporting. 10. No follow-up if anomaly found. Test reveals 10 % under-cement; no action. Mandatory follow-up: investigate root cause, increase sampling, reject batches if needed.

Where it sits in concrete QA/QC

Concrete QA cascade:

1. Source qualification (one-time): - Mix design (cement, w/c, aggregate proportions) - Trial mix verification (strength, workability) - Washout analysis (this code, IS 1199 Part 7) on trial batches — verify mix proportions deliver as designed - Cube tests at multiple ages

2. Routine QA (per delivery): - Slump test (IS 1199 Part 1) - Cube casting + 7d/28d testing - Visual inspection (uniformity, segregation)

3. Periodic audit (per 500-1000 m³): - Washout analysis to verify cement content + w/c - Density test

4. Investigation (on demand): - When cube fails: washout to determine if cement was correct - When workability drifts: washout to determine if water added on-site

5. Documentation: - Per-batch records: design mix, plant batch, slump, cube - Periodic washout reports - Trends + anomalies tracked

IS 1199 Part 7 is the deep-dive QA tool — invoked when indirect QA (cube strength, slump) raises concerns or for source qualification of new suppliers. For routine production QC, slump + cube cover 95 % of needs; washout fills the remaining 5 % of high-stakes verification.

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
ASTM C143 / C143M-22ASTM International (US)
HighCurrent
Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete
Specifies the procedure for determining the slump of fresh hydraulic-cement concrete.
EN 12350-2:2019CEN (European Committee for Standardization)
HighCurrent
Testing fresh concrete - Part 2: Slump test
Defines the method for determining the consistency of fresh concrete using the slump test.
BS EN 12350-2:2019BSI (UK)
HighCurrent
Testing fresh concrete. Slump test
The UK's adoption of the European standard for determining fresh concrete slump.
ISO 1920-2:2016ISO (International)
HighCurrent
Testing of concrete — Part 2: Properties of fresh concrete
Includes the slump test method as one of several tests for fresh concrete properties.
Key Differences
≠The time specified for lifting the slump cone is different. IS 1199 requires lifting the mould vertically in 5 to 10 seconds, whereas ASTM C143 specifies a stricter and faster duration of 5 ± 2 seconds (i.e., 3 to 7 seconds).
≠The procedure for handling a shear or collapse slump differs. IS 1199 states that if a repeat test also results in a shear/collapse, the result should be recorded. ASTM C143, however, states that if two consecutive tests result in a shear, the concrete likely lacks the cohesiveness for the slump test to be applicable, implying the test method is invalid for that sample.
≠There is a difference in the specified length of the tamping rod. IS 1199 specifies a fixed length of 600 ± 5 mm. ASTM C143 allows for a range, specifying a length of not less than 400 mm and not more than 600 mm.
Key Similarities
≈The fundamental dimensions of the slump cone (mould) are identical: a frustum with a base diameter of 200 mm, a top diameter of 100 mm, and a height of 300 mm.
≈The procedure for filling the mould is the same in both standards: the concrete is placed in three layers of approximately equal volume.
≈The tamping procedure is identical. Each of the three layers must be tamped 25 times with a standardized tamping rod, with strokes distributed evenly over the cross-section.
≈The method of measurement and reporting precision are the same. Slump is measured as the vertical distance from the top of the mould to the displaced center of the specimen, and the result is recorded to the nearest 5 mm.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Mould Height300 mm300 ± 2 mmASTM C143 / C143M-22
Mould Lifting Time5 s to 10 s5 ± 2 s (3 s to 7 s)ASTM C143 / C143M-22
Tamping Rod Length600 ± 5 mm400 mm to 600 mmASTM C143 / C143M-22
Tamping Rod Diameter16 ± 1 mm16 ± 2 mmASTM C143 / C143M-22
Number of Layers33ASTM C143 / C143M-22
Strokes per Layer2525ASTM C143 / C143M-22
Reporting IncrementNearest 5 mmNearest 5 mm [1/4 in.]ASTM C143 / C143M-22
Action on 2nd Shear SlumpRecord the resultTest is not applicable to the concreteASTM C143 / C143M-22
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values9

Quick Reference Values
Top diameter of slump cone100 ± 2 mm
Bottom diameter of slump cone200 ± 2 mm
Height of slump cone300 ± 2 mm
Tamping rod diameter16 ± 1 mm
Tamping rod length600 ± 5 mm
Number of layers for filling3 equal layers (by volume)
Tamping strokes per layer25 strokes
Time to lift the mould5 to 10 seconds
Total time to complete testMax 150 seconds from start of filling

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Apparatus
Clause 5 - Test Procedure
Clause 6 - Test Result and Measurement
Clause 7 - Test Report

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 11991:1987Specification for Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) - Agg...
→
IS 10262:2019Concrete Mix Proportioning - Guidelines
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

How many layers should the slump cone be filled in?+
Three equal layers by volume (approx. 1/4, 1/2, and full height).
How many tamping strokes are required per layer?+
25 strokes per layer using a 16 mm diameter tamping rod with a rounded end.
How fast should the slump cone be lifted?+
It should be lifted vertically upwards in a steady motion taking exactly 5 to 10 seconds.
Where do you measure the slump from?+
Measure the difference between the height of the mould and the highest point of the slumped test specimen.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

Code-Specific Templates for IS 1199
✅
Pre-Pour Inspection Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
✅
During-Pour Inspection Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
✅
Post-Pour / Curing Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
📊
Chemical Admixture Material Test Certificate (MTC) Receipt Verification
test-report
Excel / PDF
📊
Field Slump Test Record
test-report
Excel / PDF