IS 1199:2018 Part 7 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for methods of sampling and analysis of concrete - part 7: determination of the slump. This standard specifies the procedure for determining the workability and consistency of fresh concrete using the slump cone test. It is universally used by engineers on construction sites to verify that delivered concrete has the specified fluidity before it is placed.
Specifies the method for determining the slump of fresh concrete using a slump cone.
IS 1199 (Part 7) specifies the method of sampling and analysis of fresh concrete — analysis of fresh concrete (washing-out / washout method). The IS 1199 multi-part series is the comprehensive Indian standard for fresh concrete testing.
The IS 1199:2018 series: - Part 1: Sampling methods + slump test (most common) - Part 2: Determination of density of fresh concrete - Part 3: Vee-bee consistometer (workability) - Part 4: Compacting factor test (workability) - Part 5: Flow test (high-flow concrete) - Part 6: Determination of bleeding - Part 7 (this code): Analysis of fresh concrete (cement content + w/c ratio determination by washing) - Part 8: Determination of air content
Use IS 1199 Part 7 when: - Verifying actual cement content in delivered concrete - Forensic investigation of low-strength concrete (was correct cement dosed?) - Audit / dispute resolution on RMC quality - Mix-design vs delivered-mix validation - Quality-control benchmark for in-house RMC plant
The washout method separates fresh concrete into its components (cement + water + aggregate) by washing — directly verifies cement content per cubic metre and water content per cubic metre.
1. Sample fresh concrete per IS 1199 Part 1:2018 — minimum 5-10 kg from point of placement. 2. Mass measurement — record total mass of fresh sample + container. 3. Initial sieving — pass through 4.75 mm sieve under running water; collect fines (cement + sand) + retain coarse aggregate. 4. Coarse aggregate analysis — wash, oven-dry, weigh; gives coarse aggregate content. 5. Fine fraction (cement + sand) analysis — separate cement from sand by: - Settling: cement settles slower than sand; decant - Filtration: through 75 µm sieve under water - Centrifuging: for precise separation 6. Cement content — dried mass of cement fraction × correction factor 7. Water content — by mass balance: total mass − (coarse aggregate + cement + sand) 8. Calculations: - Cement content (kg/m³) = mass of cement / volume of concrete sample - Water content (kg/m³) = mass of water / volume - w/c ratio = water / cement - Aggregate-cement ratio
Volume measurement: by direct displacement or computed from density × mass.
Reporting: - Cement content (kg/m³) - Water content (kg/m³) - w/c ratio - Aggregate proportions (coarse + fine) - Comparison with design mix - Deviation from design (acceptable: ±5 % of cement content, ±3 % of w/c)
Acceptance criteria (typical for project audit): - Cement content within ±5 % of design value - Water content within ±3 % of design - w/c ratio within ±0.05 of design
Typical mix ratios (M30 example): - Cement: 380 kg/m³ - Water: 175 kg/m³ (w/c = 0.46) - Fine aggregate: 700 kg/m³ - Coarse aggregate (20 mm): 1100 kg/m³ - Total: ~2355 kg/m³ (concrete density)
Washout result should match within tolerance.
When to run IS 1199 Part 7: - Source qualification of new RMC supplier - Routine audit (per 1000 m³ or per supplier change) - Investigation of low cube strength - Spot-check on delivered batches - Cross-validation against batching plant records
Test cost (typical 2026): - ₹3000-8000 per test (NABL lab) - Higher than routine cube test (which is ~₹500); lower than full mix-design verification
Test cadence (recommended for QC): - Source qualification: 3-5 tests on representative samples - Routine: 1 per 500-1000 m³ for high-volume projects; per supplier change - Investigation: as needed when problem suspected
Compared to other QC methods: - Cube strength (IS 516 Part 1 Sec 1:2021): indirect — measures outcome (strength), not inputs (cement, water) - Slump (IS 1199 Part 1:2018): workability, indirect indication of w/c - Density (IS 1199 Part 2:2018): indirect indication of mix proportions - Washout (this code, Part 7): direct measurement of cement + water + aggregate
Washout is the most rigorous + most expensive on-site QC; usually reserved for source qualification + dispute resolution.
1. Sample too small. Affects accuracy of separation; especially for coarse aggregate. Use ≥ 5-10 kg sample. 2. Sample from mixer outlet only. Workability + segregation may differ at placement. Sample from point of placement. 3. Cement-sand separation incomplete. Some cement particles trapped in sand fraction; cement reads low. Use centrifuge or longer settling. 4. Water content by mass balance imprecise. Small errors compound; can't detect ± 5 % water variation reliably. Direct water measurement (pre-weigh sample, dry and re-weigh) more accurate. 5. Plant operator pre-warned. Knowing audit happening, plant produces good batch (Hawthorne effect). Random / unannounced audit. 6. Single test extrapolated. One test result doesn't characterise plant; need ≥ 3 samples for meaningful average. 7. No comparison to plant batching record. Result without context; can't identify drift. Compare to supplier's batch print + design mix. 8. Test in lab, days after sample taken. Concrete hardens; impossible to wash. Test must be on FRESH concrete within hours. 9. No written audit protocol. Ad-hoc test; results disputed. Document procedure + acceptance + reporting. 10. No follow-up if anomaly found. Test reveals 10 % under-cement; no action. Mandatory follow-up: investigate root cause, increase sampling, reject batches if needed.
Concrete QA cascade:
1. Source qualification (one-time): - Mix design (cement, w/c, aggregate proportions) - Trial mix verification (strength, workability) - Washout analysis (this code, IS 1199 Part 7) on trial batches — verify mix proportions deliver as designed - Cube tests at multiple ages
2. Routine QA (per delivery): - Slump test (IS 1199 Part 1) - Cube casting + 7d/28d testing - Visual inspection (uniformity, segregation)
3. Periodic audit (per 500-1000 m³): - Washout analysis to verify cement content + w/c - Density test
4. Investigation (on demand): - When cube fails: washout to determine if cement was correct - When workability drifts: washout to determine if water added on-site
5. Documentation: - Per-batch records: design mix, plant batch, slump, cube - Periodic washout reports - Trends + anomalies tracked
IS 1199 Part 7 is the deep-dive QA tool — invoked when indirect QA (cube strength, slump) raises concerns or for source qualification of new suppliers. For routine production QC, slump + cube cover 95 % of needs; washout fills the remaining 5 % of high-stakes verification.
| Parameter | IS Value | International | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mould Height | 300 mm | 300 ± 2 mm | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Mould Lifting Time | 5 s to 10 s | 5 ± 2 s (3 s to 7 s) | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Tamping Rod Length | 600 ± 5 mm | 400 mm to 600 mm | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Tamping Rod Diameter | 16 ± 1 mm | 16 ± 2 mm | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Number of Layers | 3 | 3 | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Strokes per Layer | 25 | 25 | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Reporting Increment | Nearest 5 mm | Nearest 5 mm [1/4 in.] | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |
| Action on 2nd Shear Slump | Record the result | Test is not applicable to the concrete | ASTM C143 / C143M-22 |