InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 800 : 2007General Construction in Steel - Code of Practice

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 1993-1-1 · AISC 360 · AS 4100
CurrentEssentialCode of PracticeBIMStructural Engineering · Steel and Reinforcement
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues8InternationalClauses12Engineer's NotesTablesFAQ4RelatedQA/QCNew

IS 800:2007 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for general construction in steel - code of practice. IS 800:2007 is the fundamental code of practice for general structural steel design in India. It mandates the Limit State Method (LSM) for designing steel tension members, compression members, flexural members, and connections, ensuring safety, stability, and durability of steel structures under various loads.

Provides guidelines for design, fabrication, and erection of steel structures.

Quick Reference — IS 800:2007 Limit-State Steel Values

Partial safety factors, slenderness limits, section classification, bolt/weld and serviceability limits used in steel design.

✓ Verified 2026-04-26
ReferenceValueClause
Partial safety factor — material (yielding) γm01.10Cl. 5.4.1 (Table 5)
Partial safety factor — material (ultimate/rupture) γm11.25Cl. 5.4.1 (Table 5)
Partial safety factor — bolt (shop fabricated) γmb1.25Cl. 5.4.1 (Table 5)
Partial safety factor — weld (shop) γmw1.25 (shop) / 1.50 (site)Cl. 5.4.1 (Table 5)
Partial safety factor — DL1.5 (1.0 if relieving)Cl. 5.3.3 (Table 4)
Partial safety factor — LL leading1.5Cl. 5.3.3 (Table 4)
Steel grade — Fe410 yield (E250)fy = 250 MPa, fu = 410 MPaCl. 2.2.4 / IS 2062
Modulus of elasticity (E) for steel2.0 × 10⁵ MPaCl. 2.2.4.1
Poisson's ratio (elastic)0.30Cl. 2.2.4.1
Slenderness limit — compression member (general)180Cl. 3.8 (Table 3)
Slenderness limit — tension member (main)400 (180 if reversal)Cl. 3.8 (Table 3)
Slenderness limit — bracing / member subjected to wind only250Cl. 3.8 (Table 3)
Plastic section limit — b/t outstand of compression flange≤ 9.4 εCl. 3.7 (Table 2)
Compact / semi-compact / slender — outstand limits9.4ε / 10.5ε / 15.7εCl. 3.7 (Table 2)
ε (epsilon) factor for Fe4101.0 (= √(250/fy))Cl. 3.7.2
Bolt grade 4.6 — fub400 MPa (proof 240 MPa)Cl. 10.3 / IS 1367
Bolt grade 8.8 — fub800 MPa (proof 640 MPa)Cl. 10.3 / IS 1367
HSFG bolt — slip factor μf (clean mill scale)0.50 (typical)Cl. 10.4.3 (Table 20)
Min weld size — fillet (max parent ≤10 mm)3 mmCl. 10.5.2.3 (Table 21)
Min weld size — fillet (parent 32–50 mm)8 mmCl. 10.5.2.3 (Table 21)
Vertical deflection limit — floor beam (LL)Span / 300Cl. 5.6.1 (Table 6)
Vertical deflection limit — cantilever (LL)Span / 150Cl. 5.6.1 (Table 6)
Lateral sway limit — multi-storey (wind)Height / 500Cl. 5.6.1 (Table 6)
Effective length factor (K) — fixed-fixed0.65Cl. 7.2.2 (Table 11)
⚠ BIS Amendment 1 (2012) and subsequent corrigenda apply. Confirm with the latest BIS publication.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Essential
Domain
Structural Engineering — Steel and Reinforcement
Type
Code of Practice
Amendments
Amendment 1 (2012)
International equivalents
EN 1993-1-1:2005 · CEN (European Union)AISC 360-22 · AISC (US)AS 4100:2020 · Standards Australia (Australia)
Typically used with
IS 875IS 1893IS 2062IS 1363IS 1364IS 3757IS 814
Also on InfraLens for IS 800
12Clause pages8Key values6Tables8QA/QC templates3Handbook topics2Knowledge articles4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! Always check section classification (plastic, compact, semi-compact, slender) before calculating bending strength, as it dictates the effective section properties and whether plastic moment capacity can be utilized.
! Pay close attention to buckling classes (a, b, c, d) when calculating compressive strength. The class depends on the cross-section shape, thickness, and axis of buckling.
! For bolted connections, ensure the distinction between bearing type bolts and friction grip (HSFG) bolts is correctly applied, as their force transfer mechanisms and design formulas differ significantly.
! Deflection limits in Table 6 vary based on whether the cladding is brittle (e.g., masonry) or elastic (e.g., metal sheets).
Updates & Amendments1 amendment
2012Amendment 1 (2012)
Consolidated list per BIS. For the text of each amendment, refer to the BIS portal link above.
structural steelsteelweldsboltsHSFG bolts

Engineer's Notes

In Practice — Editorial Commentary
When IS 800 is your governing code

IS 800:2007 is the default code for any steel structure designed in India — industrial sheds, multi-storey steel frames, warehouses, communication towers, crane girders, and composite slabs. If the member resists axial, flexural, shear, or combined loads through steel primarily, start here.

Two situations where IS 800 alone is insufficient:

  • Steel road bridges — supplement with IRC 24 (steel bridges) and IRC 22 (composite structures), which govern load combinations, fatigue, and corrosion allowances specific to bridges
  • Seismic-resistant steel frames in Zone IV/V — IS 800 Clause 12 is thin (~12 pages). For important buildings, supplement with AISC 341 or EN 1998-1 provisions for detailed ductile detailing. Note this in your design basis report.
Limit State Method is the right default

The code allows both Limit State Method (LSM) and Working Stress Method (WSM), but WSM is a legacy carryover — it's retained in Annex F only for projects that specifically demand it (typically old government tenders). For any modern project, use LSM. If a tender insists on WSM in 2026, raise an RFI requesting LSM consent — the request is professionally defensible and usually accepted.

Worked example — selecting an ISMB for a simply-supported beam

Problem: 6 m simply-supported beam carrying factored UDL of 30 kN/m. Fe 250 steel, floor beam in a building. Select the lightest rolled ISMB.

Step 1 — Factored bending moment: M_u = wL² / 8 = 30 × 6² / 8 = 135 kNm

Step 2 — Required plastic section modulus per IS 800 Clause 8.2.1.2: M_d = β_b × Z_p × f_y / γ_m0, with β_b = 1 for plastic sections Rearranged: Z_p ≥ M_u × γ_m0 / f_y = 135 × 10⁶ × 1.10 / 250 = 594 cm³

Step 3 — Trial from IS 808: - ISMB 300 → Z_p = 651 cm³ ≥ 594 ✓ (44.2 kg/m) - ISMB 250 → Z_p = 465 cm³ < 594 ✗

Step 4 — Shear check per Clause 8.4: V_u = wL/2 = 90 kN V_d = d × t_w × f_y / (√3 × γ_m0) = 300 × 7.7 × 250 / (1.732 × 1.10) = 303 kN ≥ 90 ✓

Step 5 — Deflection check per Clause 5.6.1 (SLS, unfactored load): Allowable (L/300 for floor beam) = 6000/300 = 20 mm Actual with w_service ≈ 20 kN/m and I_xx = 8,603 cm⁴: δ = 5wL⁴ / (384EI) = 19.6 mm — marginal

ISMB 300 passes at the limit. For comfort margin, ISMB 350 (I = 13,630 cm⁴ → δ = 12.4 mm) adds ~13% weight but halves the deflection.

Common mistakes engineers make with IS 800

1. Wrong γ_m0 factor. Use 1.10 for yielding of members. Use 1.25 for rupture or ultimate strength of cross-section. Confusing these gives 14% error in either direction.

2. Forgetting β_b. For plastic sections (most rolled sections), β_b = 1 — but semi-compact sections have β_b = Z_e / Z_p < 1. Check Table 2 first before assuming β_b = 1.

3. Using Fe 250 for all beams. Fe 350 (E350 per IS 2062) gives 40% more moment capacity for 0-5% price premium — worth specifying for spans above 8 m.

4. Ignoring lateral-torsional buckling. Clause 8.2.2 applies whenever the compression flange is not continuously restrained. A beam with lateral bracing only at midspan and ends needs the LTB check — commonly missed on industrial shed roof beams.

5. Treating bolt bearing as the governing limit. For standard hole clearances, bolt shear usually governs before bearing. Check both per Clauses 10.3.3 and 10.3.4, but don't over-engineer bearing.

Cross-references in the Indian code stack
  • IS 2062:2011 — structural steel grades (E250, E350, E450) — material source
  • IS 808:2021 — section dimensions and properties (ISMB, ISLB, ISWB, ISHB, ISMC, ISA)
  • IS 1367 — bolt properties (Grade 4.6, 8.8, 10.9) referenced in Clauses 10.3.3-10.3.4
  • IS 875 Parts 1-3 — dead, imposed, and wind loads
  • IS 1893 Part 1:2016 — seismic design coefficients
  • IS 816:1969 — welding specifications cross-referenced by IS 800 Clause 10.5
  • IS 13920 — pairs with IS 800 for composite ductile detailing
Practitioner view

IS 800:2007 is well-written but is now 18 years old. The 2007 revision introducing LSM was a major step forward, but seismic provisions (Clause 12, ~12 pages) are thin compared to AISC 341 (~120 pages) and EN 1998-1. For seismically critical buildings — hospitals, fire stations, schools designated as shelters, tall buildings in Zone IV/V — supplement IS 800 with AISC 341 provisions for moment frames, braced frames, and plastic hinge detailing. Note the supplementation in your design basis report. Most private clients and engineering PMCs accept this; state PWDs occasionally question it but rarely reject on well-reasoned DBRs. A 2026 revision of IS 800 has been rumoured for several years but no draft has been circulated publicly.

Clauses12

12 detailed clauses with interactive calculators, reference tables, and practical notes.
Cl. Table 1
Yield Stress and Ultimate Stress for Structural Steel
Table 1 of IS 800:2007 lists the mechanical properties of structural steel conforming to IS 2062. It provides the yield …
1T→
Cl. 3.7
Classification of Cross-Sections
Clause 3.7 classifies steel cross-sections into four classes based on the width-to-thickness ratios of their compression…
1T→
Cl. 5.4.1
Partial Safety Factors for Materials
Clause 5.4.1 specifies the partial safety factors (γm) for material strength in limit state design. These factors accoun…
1T→
Cl. 7.1.2
Design Strength Due to Yielding of Gross Section
Clause 7.1.2 gives the design strength of a tension member limited by yielding of the gross cross-section. This is typic…
Calc→
Cl. 7.3.2
Design Strength Due to Rupture of Net Section
Clause 7.3.2 gives the design strength of a tension member limited by rupture (fracture) at the net cross-section throug…
→
Cl. 8.4
Design Compressive Stress fcd
Clause 8.4 gives the design compressive stress fcd for columns and compression members based on the limit state of flexu…
Calc3T→
Cl. 8.7
Effective Length of Compression Members
Clause 8.7 specifies how to determine the effective length (KL) of compression members based on their end restraint cond…
1T→
Cl. 9.2
Laterally Supported Beam
Clause 9.2 gives the design bending strength of laterally supported beams — i.e., beams with adequate lateral restraint …
Calc1T→
Cl. 9.4
Laterally Unsupported Beam
Clause 9.4 deals with beams that are not continuously laterally supported — i.e., the compression flange can buckle late…
1T→
Cl. 10.2
Minimum Requirements for Bolted Connections
Clause 10.2 specifies the minimum requirements for spacing, edge distance, and arrangement of bolts in structural connec…
2T→
Cl. 10.3.3
Bolt Strength in Shearing and Bearing
Clause 10.3.3 gives the design strength of a bolt in shear and the design bearing strength of the bolt on the connected …
Calc2T→
Cl. 10.5.7
Design Stresses in Fillet Welds
Clause 10.5.7 gives the design strength of fillet welds based on the shear strength of the weld throat. The weld is assu…
2T→
View full clause reference page →

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 1993-1-1:2005CEN (European Union)
HighCurrent
Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures — Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings
Both are limit state design codes for general steel building construction.
AISC 360-22AISC (US)
HighCurrent
Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
Both cover the design of steel buildings using LRFD/LSD principles.
AS 4100:2020Standards Australia (Australia)
HighCurrent
Steel structures
Both provide comprehensive limit state design rules for steel structures.
BS 5950-1:2000BSI (UK)
MediumWithdrawn
Structural use of steelwork in building — Part 1: Code of practice for design — Rolled and welded sections
An influential predecessor to IS 800, but now outdated and replaced by Eurocode 3.
Key Differences
≠Partial Safety Factors for Materials
≠Column Buckling Curves
≠Classification of Sections
≠Shear Lag Factor in Tension Members
Key Similarities
≈All modern codes, including IS 800, Eurocode 3, and AISC 360 (as LRFD), are based on the limit state method. This requires verifying the structure for Ultimate Limit States (ULS) for safety (e.g., strength, stability) and Serviceability Limit States (SLS) for performance (e.g., deflection, vibration).
≈The approach to designing members under combined axial force and bending is conceptually identical. All codes use interaction formulae that sum the ratios of applied forces/moments to member capacities. While the exact coefficients and exponents differ, the general form (e.g., (P/Pc) + (M/Mc) <= 1.0) is a common principle.
≈The design of tension members in IS 800, AISC 360, and Eurocode 3 is governed by the same three primary limit states: (1) Yielding of the gross cross-section, (2) Rupture (fracture) of the effective net cross-section, and (3) Block shear rupture at connections.
≈The fundamental check for shear in beam webs is similar across the codes. The design shear strength is calculated based on the shear area and the material yield strength, with reductions applied for high shear cases or when shear buckling of the web is a concern.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Partial Safety Factor for Material (Yielding, γm0)1.101.0 (γM0)EN 1993-1-1:2005
Partial Safety Factor for Material (Ultimate, γm1)1.251.25 (γM2, for connections)EN 1993-1-1:2005
Resistance Factor (φ) for FlexureImplicitly ~0.90 (1/1.10)0.90AISC 360-22
Resistance Factor (φ) for Compression MembersImplicitly ~0.90 (1/1.10)0.90AISC 360-22
Resistance Factor (φ) for Bolts (Shear)Implicitly 0.80 (1/1.25)0.75AISC 360-22
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel (E)200,000 N/mm²200,000 N/mm²EN 1993-1-1:2005
Maximum Vertical Deflection for Live Load (Floors)Span / 360 (for elements susceptible to cracking)L / 360 (common recommendation)AISC 360-22 (Appendix L)
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Compression Members)180 (carrying dead & imposed loads)200 (recommended limit)AISC 360-22 (Chapter E)
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values8

Quick Reference Values
Young's Modulus of Steel (E)200,000 N/mm²
Density of structural steel7850 kg/m³
Poisson's ratio (elastic range)0.30
Partial safety factor for yield stress (γm0)1.10
Partial safety factor for ultimate stress (γm1)1.25
Partial safety factor for shop welding (γmw)1.25
Partial safety factor for field welding (γmw)1.50
Max slenderness ratio for members carrying compressive loads from dead and imposed loads180
Key Formulas
Tdg = Ag * fy / γm0 — Design strength in tension due to yielding of gross section
Pd = Ae * fcd — Design compressive strength, where fcd depends on buckling class and slenderness
Md = βb * Zp * fy / γm0 — Design bending strength for laterally supported beams
Vd = Vn / γm0 = (Av * fyw / √3) / γm0 — Design shear strength

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 2 - Width to Thickness Ratio Limits for Section Classification
Table 4 - Partial Safety Factors for Loads
Table 5 - Partial Safety Factors for Materials
Table 6 - Deflection Limits
Table 8 - Buckling Class of Cross-Sections
Table 9 - Design Compressive Stress (fcd) for Buckling Classes a, b, c, d
Key Clauses
Clause 3.7 - Section Classification (Plastic, Compact, Semi-compact, Slender)
Clause 5 - Limit State Design
Clause 6 - Design of Tension Members
Clause 7 - Design of Compression Members
Clause 8 - Design of Members Subjected to Bending
Clause 10 - Connections (Bolts and Welds)

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 875:1987Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buil...
→
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of S...
→
IS 2062:2011Hot Rolled Medium and High Tensile Structural...
→
IS 1363:2002Hexagon Head Bolts, Screws and Nuts of Produc...
→
IS 1364:2017Hexagon Head Bolts, Screws and Nuts of Produc...
→
IS 3757:1985High Strength Structural Bolts
→
IS 814:2004Covered Electrodes for Manual Metal Arc Weldi...
→
Handbook & Design Rules
Handbook Topics
📖Beam & Slab Deflection Limits
→
📖Effective Length Factors for Columns
→
📖Weld Sizes & Strength
→
Articles & Guides
📖IS 800 vs AISC 360 vs Eurocode 3: Steel Design Code Comparison
→
📖How to Select Steel Beam Size for Your Span
→
🧮
Mix Design Calculator
IS 10262 · M20–M50

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the partial safety factor for material strength of steel?+
1.10 for yielding (γm0) and 1.25 for ultimate stress (γm1) as per Table 5.
What are the deflection limits for floor beams?+
Span / 300 for live loads if supporting elements are susceptible to cracking, as per Table 6.
What is the difference in safety factors for shop vs. site welding?+
The partial safety factor is 1.25 for shop welding and 1.50 for site welding, accounting for poorer quality control at site (Table 5).
How is the maximum effective slenderness ratio determined?+
It is based on the member's function. For example, 180 for standard compression members, 250 for members subjected to compression forces due to wind/seismic only, and 400 for tie members (Table 3).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

Code-Specific Templates for IS 800
✅
Structural Steel Erection Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
✅
Welding Inspection Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
📝
Steel Erection Method Statement
form
Excel / PDF
📐
Steel Work Inspection & Test Plan (ITP)
plan
Excel / PDF
✅
Structural Design Review Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
📝
Structural Design Review Process Method Statement
form
Excel / PDF
📐
Structural Works ITP
plan
Excel / PDF
📋
Structural Design Review Register
register
Excel / PDF