InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 1904 : 1986Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils (General requirements)

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 1997-1 · BS 8004 · IBC 2021, Chapter 18
CurrentEssentialCode of PracticeBIMGeotechnical · Building Planning and Design
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues8InternationalTablesFAQ4RelatedQA/QCNew

IS 1904:1986 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for design and construction of foundations in soils (general requirements). This code outlines the general requirements for the design and construction of shallow foundations in various soil types. It provides guidelines on required site investigation, determination of safe bearing capacity, and permissible settlement limits for different types of structures.

Lays down general requirements for the design and construction of foundations for buildings and structures in different soil types.

Quick Reference — IS 1904:1986 Foundation Design Values

Min depth, factor of safety, permissible total/differential settlement, presumptive SBC ranges and bore-hole depth requirements for shallow foundations.

✓ Verified 2026-04-26
ReferenceValueClause
Min depth of foundation (Df) — general≥ 1.0 m below groundCl. 4.1
Min depth — black cotton soil≥ 1.5 m below NGL (below shrinkage zone)Cl. 4.1.1
Factor of safety — bearing capacity (shear)3.0 (gross / net)Cl. 4.2
Factor of safety — settlementDesign for permissible value, no FoS on settlementCl. 4.3
Permissible total settlement — isolated footing on sand50 mmCl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible total settlement — isolated footing on clay75 mmCl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible total settlement — raft on sand75 mmCl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible total settlement — raft on clay100 mmCl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible differential settlement — RC frame1/500 (isolated); 1/750 (raft)Cl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible angular distortion — masonry buildings1/1000Cl. 4.3 (Table 1)
Permissible angular distortion — steel frame1/300 (general); 1/500 (cracking risk)Cl. 4.3 (Table 1)
SBC — soft clay (typical)50 – 100 kN/m²Cl. 5 / Annex (presumptive)
SBC — medium clay100 – 200 kN/m²Cl. 5 / Annex (presumptive)
SBC — loose sand100 – 200 kN/m²Cl. 5 / Annex (presumptive)
SBC — dense sand300 – 450 kN/m²Cl. 5 / Annex (presumptive)
SBC — gravel/dense gravel300 – 450 kN/m² (compact); >450 (very dense)Cl. 5 / Annex
SBC — hard rock≥ 3300 kN/m²Cl. 5 / Annex (presumptive)
Min bore-hole depth (footings)1.5 × B below founding level (B = footing width)Cl. 4.4 / refer IS 1892
Loading combinations — DL + LL + EQ33 % increase in SBC (with EQ)Cl. 4.2 / IS 1893
Plate load test — plate sizes300, 450, 600 mm (square)Cl. 5.2 / refer IS 1888
⚠ Presumptive SBC values are indicative only; site-specific testing per IS 1888 / IS 1892 is mandatory. Verify Table 1 numbering against current BIS reaffirmation.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Essential
Domain
Geotechnical — Building Planning and Design
Type
Code of Practice
Amendments
Amendment 1 (August 1995); Amendment 2 (May 1997); Amendment 3 (October 2010)
International equivalents
EN 1997-1:2004 · CEN (European Committee for Standardization)BS 8004:2015+A1:2020 · BSI (UK)IBC 2021, Chapter 18 · ICC (US)
Typically used with
IS 1892IS 2131IS 6403IS 2911IS 1893
Also on InfraLens for IS 1904
8Key values3Tables6QA/QC templates1Handbook topics2Knowledge articles4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! The presumptive Safe Bearing Capacity values in Table 1 are for preliminary design and small projects only; a proper soil investigation as per IS 1892 is mandatory for most projects.
! The effect of the water table is critical; its rise can reduce the bearing capacity by up to 50%. This must be accounted for in calculations (Clause 7.2.2).
! Differential settlement is often more critical for structural safety and serviceability than total settlement. Pay close attention to the limits in Table 2.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 5Information Required (Site Investigation)Cl. 6General Design Criteria (Depth, Spacing)Cl. 7Bearing CapacityCl. 11Settlement CriteriaCl. 14Foundations on Slopes
Pulled from IS 1904:1986. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
Updates & Amendments3 amendments
Amendment 1 (August 1995)
Amendment 2 (May 1997)
Amendment 3 (October 2010)
Consolidated list per BIS. For the text of each amendment, refer to the BIS portal link above.
soilconcretemasonry

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 1997-1:2004CEN (European Committee for Standardization)
HighCurrent
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules
Covers general principles for geotechnical design of foundations, retaining structures, and earthworks.
BS 8004:2015+A1:2020BSI (UK)
HighCurrent
Code of practice for foundations
Provides recommendations for the design and construction of foundations for buildings and other structures.
IBC 2021, Chapter 18ICC (US)
MediumCurrent
International Building Code, Chapter 18: Soils and Foundations
Sets minimum requirements for foundation systems based on geotechnical investigations and soil properties.
BS 8004:1986BSI (UK)
HighWithdrawn
Code of practice for foundations
A direct contemporary of IS 1904, covering similar principles with a working stress design approach.
Key Differences
≠Design Philosophy: IS 1904 uses the Working Stress Method (WSM), applying a single global Factor of Safety (FoS) to the ultimate bearing capacity to determine the allowable bearing pressure. In contrast, modern codes like Eurocode 7 (EN 1997-1) use Limit State Design (LSD), applying partial factors of safety to loads (actions) and material strengths (resistances) separately, providing a more nuanced assessment of risk.
≠Factor of Safety Application: In IS 1904, a typical FoS for bearing capacity is 2.5 or 3.0. Eurocode 7 does not use a single FoS; instead, it specifies different partial factors for various parameters (e.g., cohesion, friction angle, load types) and combinations (Design Approaches), leading to a more complex but potentially more economical design.
≠Geotechnical Categorization: EN 1997-1 formally introduces Geotechnical Categories 1, 2, and 3, which classify projects based on their complexity and risk. This classification dictates the required extent of ground investigation, design procedures, and supervision. IS 1904 provides general guidance on site investigation but lacks this formal risk-based categorization system.
≠Settlement Criteria: IS 1904 provides prescriptive maximum allowable settlement values for different foundation and soil types (e.g., 50 mm for isolated footings on sand). Eurocode 7 treats settlement as a Serviceability Limit State (SLS) and requires the limiting values to be established based on the specific structure's tolerance to movement, making it a project-specific requirement rather than a codified general limit.
Key Similarities
≈Underlying Bearing Capacity Theory: Both IS 1904 and international standards like Eurocode 7 are based on the same fundamental soil mechanics principles for calculating ultimate bearing capacity, using theories developed by Terzaghi, Meyerhof, Hansen, and Vesic. The general form of the bearing capacity equation (involving Nc, Nq, Nγ factors) is consistent.
≈Consideration of Water Table Effects: Both the Indian and international codes mandate the consideration of the groundwater table's position. They provide methods to adjust soil unit weight and strength parameters (using effective stress principles) when the water table is near the foundation level, as it significantly reduces bearing capacity.
≈Distinction Between Failure Modes: All codes clearly distinguish between ultimate failure (bearing capacity failure, an Ultimate Limit State) and serviceability failure (excessive settlement, a Serviceability Limit State). The design process in both systems requires separate checks for both conditions to ensure foundation safety and functionality.
≈Primacy of Site Investigation: Both IS 1904 and its international counterparts stress that reliable foundation design is impossible without a thorough geotechnical investigation. They provide recommendations on the necessary scope of investigation to determine soil stratigraphy, physical properties, and groundwater conditions.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Design PhilosophyWorking Stress Method (WSM) / Allowable Stress Design (ASD)Limit State Design (LSD)EN 1997-1:2004
Factor of Safety (Static Bearing Capacity)Global factor of 2.5 to 3.0Uses partial factors on actions, materials, and/or resistance (e.g., γM for material properties, γR for resistance)EN 1997-1:2004
Minimum Foundation Depth (Nominal)500 mm below natural ground level450 mm to be clear of topsoil; must be below frost penetration depth and zone of seasonal moisture variationBS 8004:2015
Permissible Total Settlement (Isolated Footing on Sand)50 mmNot prescribed; value to be agreed upon based on structural tolerance. Annexes may give indicative values.EN 1997-1:2004
Permissible Total Settlement (Raft on Sand)75 mmNot prescribed; depends on structure's sensitivity to total and differential settlement.EN 1997-1:2004
Permissible Differential Settlement (Clay)1/400 (ratio of settlement difference to distance)Values depend on structure type (e.g., 1/500 for frames, 1/1000 for sensitive finishes); not a single codified value.BS 8004:2015 (Annex A)
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values8

Quick Reference Values
Minimum depth of foundation500 mm
Minimum Factor of Safety against bearing capacity failure2.5
Permissible total settlement for isolated foundations on sand50 mm
Permissible total settlement for isolated foundations on clay75 mm
Permissible total settlement for raft foundations on sand75 mm
Permissible total settlement for raft foundations on clay100 mm
Permissible differential settlement for steel structuresL/500
Permissible differential settlement for RCC structuresL/1000
Key Formulas
General Bearing Capacity Equation (Annex B) for determining ultimate bearing capacity

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Presumptive Safe Bearing Capacity
Table 2 - Permissible Total Settlement, Differential Settlement and Angular Distortion
Table 3 - Typical Values of Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction
Key Clauses
Clause 5 - Information Required (Site Investigation)
Clause 6 - General Design Criteria (Depth, Spacing)
Clause 7 - Bearing Capacity
Clause 11 - Settlement Criteria
Clause 14 - Foundations on Slopes

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 1892:1979Code of practice for site investigations for ...
→
IS 2131:1981Method for standard penetration test for soil...
→
IS 6403:1981Code of practice for determination of bearing...
→
IS 2911:2010Code of practice for design and construction ...
→
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of S...
→
Handbook & Design Rules
Handbook Topics
📖Safe Bearing Capacity of Soils
→
Articles & Guides
📖Soil Bearing Capacity Values as per IS 1904
→
📖Foundation Selection Guide — Isolated, Combined, Raft, Pile
→
Visual Maps
🗺️Soil Bearing Capacity MapSBC ranges for foundation sizing
→
🗺️Frost Depth MapFoundation depth guidance for cold regions
→
🗺️Groundwater Table MapWater-table depth for foundation + waterproofing
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the minimum depth for a foundation?+
50 cm below the natural ground level, after removal of topsoil and any disturbed soil (Clause 6.2.1).
What is the normal factor of safety against bearing capacity failure?+
A minimum of 2.5 is used for static loads. This can increase to 3.0 or more depending on uncertainties and the importance of the structure (Clause 7.1.1).
What is the maximum allowable settlement for an isolated RCC footing on clay?+
75 mm for total settlement and a differential settlement of L/1000 (Table 2).
Should I use this code for pile foundations?+
No, this code is for shallow foundations (footings, rafts). For pile foundations, refer to the IS 2911 series.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

Code-Specific Templates for IS 1904
✅
Excavation Inspection Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
✅
Backfilling & Compaction Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
✅
Foundation (Footing/Raft) Checklist
checklist
Excel / PDF
📝
Excavation Method Statement
form
Excel / PDF
📐
Geotechnical ITP
plan
Excel / PDF
📊
CBR (California Bearing Ratio) Test Report
test-report
Excel / PDF