InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
IRC 45 : 1972

Estimation of Resistance of Soil Below Maximum Scour Level — Foundations of Road Bridges

International Comparison — Coming Soon
CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeTransportation · Bridges and Bridge Engineering
PDFGoogleIRC Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
Summary

IRC 45 provides the method for calculating lateral soil resistance below the scour line — essential for checking stability of bridge foundations (wells and piles) against overturning due to water current, wind, seismic, and braking forces.

Methods for estimating resistance offered by soil below maximum scour level to lateral loads on bridge foundations — crucial for well and pile foundation stability.

Key Values
Safety factor (overturning)Min 2.0
Grip length (well foundation)Min 1/3 of max scour depth below HFL
Passive earth pressure coefficientKp = (1+sin φ)/(1-sin φ)
Practical Notes
! NOTE: Only edition ever published (reprinted through 2009, never revised)
! Scour + lateral resistance together determine foundation depth — both must be checked.
! IRC 45 resistance calculations assume soil below scour line is undisturbed — conservative assumption.
! For well foundations, grip length governs the well depth — typically 1/3 to 1/2 of max scour depth.
! During floods, scour reduces the soil available for lateral resistance — design for worst case.
! Always use site-specific soil parameters from bore logs — assumed values can be dangerously wrong.
! Always start with a thorough site investigation to accurately determine soil strata and properties below scour level. Generic values are a starting point, not a substitute for site data.
! For cohesive soils, the coefficient of subgrade reaction can vary significantly with moisture content and consolidation. Consider seasonal variations.
! In areas prone to liquefaction, special considerations and investigations are mandatory, potentially requiring different design approaches beyond IRC 45.
! The determination of scour depth is critical. Always refer to the latest relevant IRC codes (like IRC 78) and conduct hydraulic studies for accurate estimation. Underestimating scour depth is a common failure cause.
! When dealing with pile foundations, the interaction between piles and surrounding soil, especially in stratified layers, needs careful consideration, often requiring advanced finite element analysis.
! For well foundations, assess the resistance from the soil mass mobilized during tilting and sliding. The friction along the well shaft is also a significant resisting component.
! Deflection criteria are paramount for serviceability. Ensure that computed deflections under various load combinations are within the limits specified to avoid discomfort to users or damage to the superstructure.
! The modulus of elasticity of concrete should be appropriately chosen based on the grade of concrete used, as specified in relevant IRC codes (e.g., IRC 21).
! For seismic regions, lateral loads due to earthquakes must be considered in addition to other transient loads. This code provides a basis for static lateral load analysis.
! The concept of coefficient of subgrade reaction assumes a linear elastic behavior of the soil. For large deformations or non-linear soil response, more advanced methods may be necessary.
! Moment of inertia (I) calculation for piers and piles must account for the concrete and steel reinforcement, as well as any internal structural elements.
! The bearing capacity of soil is distinct from its resistance to lateral loads. Both need to be checked independently.
! For significant lateral loads or where soil conditions are challenging, a detailed geotechnical investigation report is indispensable, guiding the foundation design.
! Ensure consistency between the modulus of elasticity of soil used for subgrade reaction and the modulus of elasticity of the foundation material.
! Regular monitoring of bridge foundations, especially after major flood events, is a good practice to assess performance and detect any potential issues.
Cross-Referenced Codes
IRC 78:2014Standard Specifications and Code of Practice ...
→
IRC 6:2017Standard Specifications and Code of Practice ...
→
IS 2911:2010Code of practice for design and construction ...
→
IS 6403:1981Code of practice for determination of bearing...
→
scourlateral resistancefoundation stabilitysoil resistancebridge foundationIRC
📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →
🌐
International Comparison — Coming Soon
We're adding equivalent international standards for this code.
Quick Reference Values
Safety factor (overturning)Min 2.0
Grip length (well foundation)Min 1/3 of max scour depth below HFL
Passive earth pressure coefficientKp = (1+sin φ)/(1-sin φ)
Active earth pressure coefficientKa = (1-sin φ)/(1+sin φ)
Soil friction angle (sand)28-36° typical for alluvial sand
Soil friction angle (gravel)35-45°
Maximum scour depth calculationDependent on discharge and river characteristics
Coefficient of subgrade reaction (Ks) for cohesive soils (rock/stiff clay)Up to 120 MN/m^3
Coefficient of subgrade reaction (Ks) for cohesionless soils (sand/gravel)Up to 60 MN/m^3
Allowable lateral deflection of foundation (circular pier)15 mm
Allowable lateral deflection of foundation (rectangular pier)20 mm
Allowable lateral deflection of foundation (well foundation)0.003 * D (where D is diameter/width)
Factor of Safety against tilting of well foundation3.0
Factor of Safety against sliding of foundation2.0
Modulus of Elasticity (E) for concrete28-35 GPa (depending on grade)
Modulus of Elasticity (E) for steel (reinforcing bars)200 GPa
Poisson's Ratio (μ) for soil0.25 - 0.40 (typically)
Unit weight of concrete24 kN/m^3
Unit weight of water9.81 kN/m^3
Bearing capacity of soil (estimated)Varies widely, requires site-specific investigation
Maximum allowable settlementDependent on bridge type and span, typically < 25 mm
Coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction (K h)Determined from soil properties and foundation geometry
Load eccentricity for wellsGenerally limited to 1/8th of diameter/width
Maximum scour depth estimation basisRefer to IRC 78:2017 (for road bridges) or relevant hydraulic studies
Lateral load duration factorConsidered for transient loads like wind and seismic
Temperature variation considerationFor expansion/contraction and resulting stresses
Key Formulas
Passive resistance = 0.5 × γ × D² × Kp × B (per unit width)
Active pressure = 0.5 × γ × D² × Ka × B
Net lateral resistance = Passive - Active
Stability check: Resisting moment / Overturning moment ≥ 2.0
Lateral deflection of a pier = (4 * P * H^3) / (E * I) (for a cantilever pier, simplified)
Pressure distribution on foundation base = Load / Area (for gravity loads)
Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction (K_s) = Constant * E_soil / (1 + ν_soil)
Bending moment at any depth (M_x) = f(Applied Lateral Load, Depth)
Lateral resistance of soil element = K_h * y * thickness (where y is deflection)
Factor of Safety (Sliding) = Resisting Force / Overturning Force
Key Tables
Table 1 — Earth pressure coefficients
Table 1 — Values of Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction for Different Soils
Table 2 — Allowable Lateral Deflections of Bridge Foundations
Table 3 — Factors of Safety for Foundation Stability
Table 4 — Recommended Modulus of Elasticity for Structural Materials
Table 5 — Unit Weights of Common Construction Materials
Table 6 — Soil Classification for Foundation Design Purposes
Key Clauses
Cl. 3 — Lateral soil resistance model
Cl. 4 — Passive earth pressure below scour level
Cl. 5 — Stability check against overturning
Cl. 6 — Grip length determination
Cl. 2.1 — General Scope of the Code
Cl. 3.1 — Methods for Estimating Resistance
Cl. 4.1 — Analysis of Lateral Load Effects
Cl. 5.1 — Determination of Soil Properties
Cl. 6.1 — Calculation of Subgrade Reaction
Cl. 7.1 — Stability Checks for Foundations
Cl. 8.1 — Deflection Criteria for Foundations
Cl. 9.1 — Considerations for Well Foundations
Cl. 10.1 — Load Combinations and Factors of Safety
What is grip length?+
The depth of foundation embedded below maximum scour level. It provides lateral resistance (passive earth pressure) to prevent tilting/overturning. For wells: min 1/3 of max scour depth below HFL. For piles: determined by lateral capacity analysis per IS 2911.
Why is scour so dangerous for bridges?+
Scour removes the soil that supports and stabilizes the foundation. During floods: 1) water level rises (more lateral force), 2) bed erodes (less soil for resistance). This double effect has caused more bridge collapses in India than any other mechanism.
IRC 45 vs IRC 78 — relationship?+
IRC 78 tells you how DEEP to go (scour depth + grip). IRC 45 tells you how much RESISTANCE the soil provides below scour level. Both are needed together for foundation stability analysis.
What is the primary purpose of IRC 45:1972?+
IRC 45:1972 provides methods for estimating the resistance offered by soil below the maximum scour level to lateral loads acting on bridge foundations. This is crucial for ensuring the stability and safety of bridge substructures, particularly for well and pile foundations, against overturning, sliding, and excessive deflection.
How is the maximum scour depth determined for applying IRC 45?+
The maximum scour depth is a critical input parameter and is typically determined based on hydraulic studies of the river, considering factors like discharge, bed material, and bank conditions. Engineers should refer to the latest relevant IRC codes, such as IRC 78:2017 for Road Bridges, which provide guidelines for scour depth estimation.
What are the main types of lateral loads considered in foundation design according to this code?+
IRC 45:1972 considers various lateral loads, including those from wind, seismic forces, river currents, and braking forces from vehicular traffic. The code's methodology helps engineers evaluate the foundation's response to these combined forces.
What is the coefficient of subgrade reaction, and how is it determined for lateral loads?+
The coefficient of subgrade reaction (K_h) quantifies the stiffness of the soil in resisting lateral movement. It is typically determined based on the soil's modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, and the geometry of the foundation element. IRC 45 provides guidance and tables for estimating these values for different soil types.
Are there specific deflection limits for bridge foundations?+
Yes, IRC 45:1972 specifies allowable lateral deflection limits for different types of bridge foundations to ensure serviceability and prevent damage. These limits are generally expressed in absolute values or as a fraction of the foundation dimension.
How does IRC 45 address the stability of well foundations under lateral loads?+
For well foundations, IRC 45:1972 requires checks for both tilting and sliding stability. The resistance offered by the soil mass mobilized around the well and the friction along the well shaft are considered in these checks, with appropriate factors of safety applied.
What is the role of soil investigation in applying IRC 45?+
Thorough soil investigation is paramount. IRC 45 relies heavily on accurate soil properties (e.g., modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, shear strength) determined through site-specific investigations to estimate subgrade reaction and bearing capacity. Generic values should only be used as preliminary estimates.
Does this code cover dynamic analysis of foundations under lateral loads?+
IRC 45:1972 primarily focuses on static analysis methods for estimating lateral resistance. While it accounts for transient loads like seismic and wind, it does not explicitly detail dynamic analysis techniques. For dynamic analysis, other specialized codes or advanced computational methods might be required.
How are factors of safety applied in the stability checks according to IRC 45?+
IRC 45:1972 specifies minimum factors of safety for various stability checks, such as against overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity failure. These factors ensure that the foundation can withstand loads with an adequate margin of safety under worst-case scenarios.
What are the key differences in applying IRC 45 to cohesive versus cohesionless soils?+
The coefficient of subgrade reaction and the failure mechanisms under lateral loads differ significantly between cohesive and cohesionless soils. Cohesionless soils often exhibit higher resistance but can be susceptible to liquefaction. Cohesive soils' resistance is influenced by undrained/drained shear strength and can be time-dependent.
Are there any considerations for pile foundations specifically in IRC 45?+
Yes, IRC 45:1972 provides guidance on estimating the lateral resistance of soil for pile foundations. The analysis often involves considering the soil's response around the pile group and the interaction between individual piles.
How does IRC 45 relate to other IRC codes like IRC 78 or IRC 21?+
IRC 45 works in conjunction with other IRC codes. For example, IRC 78 (Loads and Stresses) dictates the types and magnitudes of loads, while IRC 21 (Concrete Bridges) provides material properties for concrete structures. IRC 45 specifically addresses the soil-foundation interaction for lateral loads.