BOQ Builder·Auto-BOQ from dimensions, DSR ratesNEWBidEasy·Government tenders, searchableLIVE
← CAD Library

Road Pavement Cross-Section Generator

IRC 37:2018 flexible · IRC 58:2015 rigid · IRC SP 62 rural
Pavement Type
Roadway Geometry
Carriageway (mm)
No. of lanes
Shoulder width (mm)
Camber / cross-fall (%)
Subgrade CBR (%)
Design traffic (msa)
Flexible Layers (IRC 37) — mm
BC — wearing
DBM — binder
WMM — base
GSB — sub-base
Subgrade (compacted)
Materials
Concrete (PQC)
Steel (dowel/tie)
PQC ≈ M40 per IRC 58:2015 — pick the closest spec grade above. Dowels are plain MS round bars; tie bars are deformed.
Computed Output
Total crust (above subgrade)600 mm
Formation width10000 mm
Camber drop at edge88 mm
Bituminous mix / km2468 t
BC · 40 mm280 m³/km
DBM · 110 mm770 m³/km
WMM · 250 mm1750 m³/km
GSB · 200 mm2000 m³/km
SUBGRADE · 500 mm5000 m³/km
Live Preview — Cross-Section
CROSS-SECTION — FLEXIBLEFlexible · IRC 37:2018 · V×5BC 40DBM 110WMM 250GSB 200SUBGRADE 500CLDRAINFORMATION = 10000 mmCarriageway 7000 · Shoulder 2×1500 · Camber 2.5%
Vertical scale exaggerated so thin courses read. PDF adds full sheet layout, layer schedule, per-km quantities, title block, notes.
Quick Reference — IRC 37 / IRC 58 / IRC SP 62
Flexible design (IRC 37:2018)Mechanistic-empirical — subgrade CBR + cumulative traffic in msa
Rigid design (IRC 58:2015)Westergaard edge stress + cumulative fatigue; dowel + tie standards
Rural / low-volumeIRC SP 62:2014 (cement concrete) · IRC SP 20:2002 (Rural Roads Manual)
Camber by surfaceCement concrete 1.7–2% · bituminous 2–2.5% · WBM 2.5–3% · earthen 3–4%
Dowel bar (IRC 58)Ø 25–38 mm @ 300 c/c, length ~500 mm, one half debonded
Tie bar (IRC 58)Ø 12 mm deformed @ ~600 c/c, length ~640 mm
Joint spacingContraction ~4.5 m · expansion 90–140 m (IRC 58 Cl. 8)
Full code reference: IRC 37:2018 → · IRC 58:2015 → · IRC SP 62:2014 → · IRC SP 20:2002 →

About road pavement cross-sections

A pavement cross-section is the transverse layered profile of a road about its centre-line — every layer from the compacted subgrade up to the running surface, with camber for drainage and shoulders on each side. Indian roads use two structural systems: flexible (bituminous) pavements designed to IRC 37:2018 and rigid (cement concrete) pavements designed to IRC 58:2015. Rural and low-volume roads follow IRC SP 62:2014 (cement concrete) and the IRC SP 20:2002 Rural Roads Manual. This generator produces the construction-issue cross-section for both systems.

Flexible vs rigid — when to use each

Layer functions

Design basis (what the generator follows)

  1. Flexible — IRC 37:2018: mechanistic-empirical. Inputs are the subgrade resilient modulus (from CBR) and cumulative standard axles (in msa over the design life). The layer thicknesses are read from the IRC 37 design catalogue / IITPAVE so that horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the bituminous layer (fatigue) and vertical compressive strain on the subgrade (rutting) stay within limits.
  2. Rigid — IRC 58:2015: the PQC slab thickness is fixed by Westergaard edge-load flexural stress combined with temperature-differential (warping) stress, checked against cumulative fatigue damage from the axle-load spectrum. Dowel bars transfer load across transverse contraction joints; tie bars hold the longitudinal joint together without acting as load-transfer.
  3. Rural / low-volume: IRC SP 62:2014 for rural cement-concrete roads and IRC SP 20:2002 (Rural Roads Manual) for the overall geometric + structural standards on PMGSY-type roads.

Common mistakes

  1. Inadequate subgrade compaction / wrong CBR — designing on a soaked-CBR value not actually achieved on site, or compacting below 97% MDD. The whole flexible design rests on the subgrade modulus; a 2% CBR shortfall can halve pavement life. Test soaked CBR on remoulded samples at field density per IS 2720 / IRC 37 Cl. 6.
  2. GSB drainage omitted — using a poorly-graded or contaminated GSB that does not drain. Trapped water under the bound layers causes pumping, stripping and rapid failure. IRC 37 Cl. 7 mandates a drainage layer with defined permeability and outlets to side drains.
  3. Camber wrong → ponding — flat or reverse camber, or camber far below the IRC SP 20 values, leaves water standing on the carriageway: aquaplaning, edge softening and potholing. Bituminous needs 2–2.5%, cement concrete 1.7–2%.
  4. Rigid joints mis-spaced → cracking — contraction joints spaced wider than ~4.5 m (or not matched to slab thickness) crack mid-panel because the slab cannot relieve shrinkage + thermal contraction. Expansion joints omitted or wrongly spaced cause blow-ups in summer.
  5. No dowel at contraction joint → faulting — without dowel bars the joint loses load transfer; adjacent slabs deflect differently under traffic, causing stepping/faulting and a rough ride. IRC 58 fixes dowel Ø, length and spacing by slab thickness.
  6. Tie bar vs dowel confusion — using deformed tie bars at transverse joints (they lock the joint and induce cracking) or plain dowels at the longitudinal joint (no hold). Dowels = plain MS, one half debonded, transverse joints; tie bars = deformed, bonded, longitudinal joint only.
  7. Shoulder not built up → edge failure — leaving an unpaved, lower, soft shoulder removes lateral confinement of the carriageway edge. The bituminous edge ravels and breaks back; on rigid pavement, untied shoulders raise edge stress. Build the shoulder to formation level with adequate cross-fall.

Related references