Handbook›ISO 19650 Information Delivery Process

ISO 19650 Information Delivery Process

ISO 19650-2:2018 · Cl 5 — Activities of the information management process during the delivery phase

Step-by-step walk-through of the ISO 19650-2 information delivery cycle. Eight activities run iteratively from project start to handover. Each activity has inputs, outputs, and a responsible party. This is the backbone of ISO 19650 compliance during project delivery.

ISO 19650-2 →

14 items shown

The 8 Activities (Cl 5.1 – 5.8)

#	Activity	Responsible	Inputs	Outputs	Key Question
1	Assessment and Need	Appointing Party	Asset information needs, business case	OIR, AIR, PIR drafts; project need statement	What do we ACTUALLY need to know about this asset, and why?
2	Invitation to Tender	Appointing Party	PIR, EIR (draft)	Tender pack with EIR + pre-appointment BEP requirements	What information do we want bidders to commit to delivering?
3	Tender Response	Prospective Lead Appointed Party	Tender pack, EIR	Pre-appointment BEP, capability statement, mobilisation plan	Can we actually deliver this EIR? With what tools, in what timeframe?
4	Appointment	Both parties	Tender response, contract negotiations	Signed appointment, post-appointment BEP, MIDP first draft	What does the contract actually obligate us to deliver?
5	Mobilisation	Lead Appointed Party	Post-appointment BEP, software list, BIM library	Tested CDE, federation rules, naming convention enforced, kickoff confirmed	Have we proven we CAN actually produce information to spec, BEFORE we start doing it?
6	Collaborative Production of Information	All Appointed Parties	TIDPs, EIR, model templates	Information containers in CDE (WIP → Shared → Published)	Are containers being produced, shared, and accepted on schedule?
7	Information Model Delivery	Lead Appointed Party	Information containers from all parties	Verified, authorised information model handed to appointing party	Has every milestone deliverable been verified against acceptance criteria and authorised?
8	Project Close-Out	All parties	Final published models, lessons-learned register	Archived CDE, AIM handover (to ISO 19650-3 ops phase), close-out report	Has everything been preserved, and what did we learn?

Iteration vs. Linear

#	Activity	Responsible	Inputs	Outputs	Key Question
—	Activities 5–7 RUN ITERATIVELY	—	—	Multiple cycles tied to project gateways	Each milestone (Concept, Tech Design, Construction, etc.) re-runs activities 5–7 with the next round of EIR

Pre-appointment vs Post-appointment BEP

#	Activity	Responsible	Inputs	Outputs	Key Question
PRE	Pre-Appointment BEP	Prospective Lead Appointed Party	Tender EIR	Short demonstration of capability (5-10 pages)	Sections: project info, proposed approach to EIR, key personnel, tools, capability evidence
POST	Post-Appointment BEP	Lead Appointed Party (binding)	Awarded contract, all appointed parties confirmed	Signed contract document (30-50 pages typical)	Sections: detailed responsibilities, MIDP, CDE platform, naming, classification, federation strategy, clash protocol, model authoring standards, software versions, security, archival, close-out

Federation & Clash Protocol

#	Activity	Responsible	Inputs	Outputs	Key Question
FED	Federation Strategy	Lead Appointed Party	All discipline models	Federated model in coordination tool	Who federates, how often, in which tool? (Navisworks / Solibri / BIM Track / Revizto)
CLASH	Clash Detection Protocol	Coordination Lead	Federated model	Clash report by category, severity, owner	Hard clash vs soft clash; clearance rules; who fixes; re-test cycle
MILESTONES	Coordination Milestones	All Appointed Parties	Project programme	Stage-gate clash sign-offs	Typical: Concept → Tech Design → Construction Issue → As-Built

Notes

• ISO 19650-2 is a PROCESS standard — it tells you HOW to manage information, not WHAT BIM tool to use

• The 8-activity cycle runs once per project gateway, not once per project

• Skipping mobilisation (activity 5) is the single most common cause of BIM project failure — test the CDE BEFORE you start producing models

• The pre-appointment BEP is judged on credibility, not on detail — overcommit and you lose money, undercommit and you don't win the work

• Verification (activity 7) needs measurable acceptance criteria — vague EIRs cause disputes

• Project close-out (activity 8) hands the PIM to the operations team as the AIM — if you skip this, the asset owner cannot maintain the model

← Previous

BIM Concepts & Terminology

LOD & LOIN Frameworks

Generated by InfraLens · infralens.in