InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 9527 (Part 1) : 1974Code of practice for design and construction of port and harbour structures, Part 1: Concrete monoliths

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
BS 6349-2 · OCDI · PIANC Report 121
CurrentSpecializedCode of PracticeStructural Engineering · Ports and Harbours
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues5InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 9527:1974 (Part 1) is the Indian Standard (BIS) for design and construction of port and harbour structures, part 1: concrete monoliths. This code of practice outlines the design and construction procedures for concrete monoliths used in port and harbour structures. It covers aspects like material selection, design loads, stability analysis (overturning and sliding), and construction methodologies including casting, sinking operations, and hearting (filling).

Code of practice for design and construction of port and harbour structures, Part 1: Concrete monoliths

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Structural Engineering — Ports and Harbours
Type
Code of Practice
International equivalents
BS 6349-2:2019 · BSI (British Standards Institution), United KingdomOCDI-2009 · The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, JapanPIANC Report 121 · PIANC (The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure), InternationalUSACE CEM Part VI, Ch. 5 · US Army Corps of Engineers, USA
Typically used with
IS 456IS 269IS 1786IS 383
Also on InfraLens for IS 9527
5Key values4FAQs
Practical Notes
! Controlling the verticality and position of the monolith during sinking (known as 'well sinking') is the most critical and challenging aspect of construction, requiring careful and balanced excavation from internal dredge wells.
! The design and strength of the 'cutting edge' at the base of the monolith is crucial as it must penetrate the soil and withstand high stresses during sinking.
! A thorough geotechnical investigation of the seabed is essential to predict sinking behavior and ensure the final founding stratum provides adequate bearing capacity.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 4MaterialsCl. 5Design ConsiderationsCl. 5.3StabilityCl. 6ConstructionCl. 6.2CastingCl. 6.3Sinking
Pulled from IS 9527:1974. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
concretecementsteelrock fill

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
BS 6349-2:2019BSI (British Standards Institution), United Kingdom
HighCurrent
Maritime works — Part 2: Code of practice for the design of quay walls, jetties and dolphins
Directly covers the design of gravity quay walls, which are functionally identical to concrete monoliths.
OCDI-2009The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, Japan
HighCurrent
Technical Standards and Commentaries for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan
Provides comprehensive and highly detailed design standards for caisson-type quay walls and breakwaters.
PIANC Report 121PIANC (The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure), International
MediumCurrent
Harbour and Inland Navigation Structures - Recommendations for the Design and Assessment
Provides modern design philosophy (Limit State Design) and principles applicable to monoliths, though not a prescriptive code.
USACE CEM Part VI, Ch. 5US Army Corps of Engineers, USA
MediumCurrent
Coastal Engineering Manual, Part VI, Chapter 5: Structural Design
Covers general structural design principles for coastal structures, including gravity walls and caissons.
Key Differences
≠Design Philosophy: IS 9527:1974 is based on the Allowable/Permissible Stress Design (ASD) method, using global Factors of Safety. Modern international standards (e.g., BS 6349, OCDI) use Limit State Design (LSD) with partial safety factors on loads and material properties.
≠Seismic Design: The seismic analysis and design provisions in IS 9527:1974 are rudimentary. Modern codes like OCDI-2009 provide advanced, detailed methodologies for seismic design, including dynamic analysis, liquefaction assessment, and specific formulae for hydrodynamic pressures.
≠Durability and Materials: IS 9527:1974 has less stringent requirements for concrete durability in marine environments. Modern standards like BS 6349 (referencing BS 8500) have detailed specifications for concrete mix, cement type, and significantly larger concrete cover based on exposure classes and design life.
≠Geotechnical Analysis: Modern standards integrate detailed geotechnical design codes (like Eurocode 7 for BS 6349), requiring rigorous analysis of soil-structure interaction, bearing capacity, and slope stability using partial factors on soil parameters, which is more advanced than the global factor of safety approach in the IS code.
Key Similarities
≈Fundamental Stability Checks: Both IS 9527 and modern equivalents mandate checking the structure's fundamental stability against sliding, overturning, and excessive bearing pressure on the foundation soil.
≈Basic Load Types: The primary load types considered are consistent across all standards: self-weight (dead load), surcharge (live load), earth pressures, hydrostatic pressures, and environmental loads like waves and currents.
≈Structural Form and Function: The basic concept of a concrete monolith as a large, hollow gravity structure, floated into place, sunk, and filled with ballast to act as a quay wall or breakwater, is common to both the IS code and modern practices.
≈Construction Sequence: The general principles and sequence of construction, such as slip-forming, launching, towing, positioning, sinking, and filling, are described in a similar conceptual manner in both the old and new standards.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Design PhilosophyPermissible Stress Design (ASD)Limit State Design (LSD) / Performance Based DesignBS 6349-2:2019
Factor of Safety against Sliding (Typical)≥ 1.5Verified using partial factors on actions and resistances (e.g., GEO and STR limit states). No single F.S. is specified.BS 6349-2:2019 / Eurocode 7
Factor of Safety against Overturning (Typical)≥ 1.5 (or resultant within middle-third of base)Verified by ensuring equilibrium using partial factors on stabilizing and destabilizing actions (EQU limit state).BS 6349-2:2019 / Eurocode 7
Concrete Cover (Severe Marine Splash Zone)~40-50 mm (based on referenced codes of the era)≥ 60 mm + Δc (allowance for deviation), depending on concrete grade and design life.BS 6349-2:2019 referencing BS 8500
Wave Force CalculationGeneral mention, recommends methods like Molitor's formula (Clause 4.5).Recommends advanced methods like the Goda formula for composite breakwaters and caissons.OCDI-2009
Design LifeNot explicitly defined as a primary design parameter.Typically specified upfront, e.g., 50 or 100 years, and directly influences durability and material choices.BS 6349-2:2019
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values5

Quick Reference Values
Minimum factor of safety against overturning1.5
Minimum factor of safety against sliding1.2
Minimum grade of concrete for cutting edgeM15
Minimum grade of concrete for steiningM15
Typical height of a single lift for casting steining1.5 m to 2.5 m
Key Formulas
Factor of Safety (Overturning) = Σ Resisting Moments / Σ Overturning Moments
Factor of Safety (Sliding) = (μ * Σ Vertical Forces) / Σ Horizontal Forces

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Materials
Clause 5 - Design Considerations
Clause 5.3 - Stability
Clause 6 - Construction
Clause 6.2 - Casting
Clause 6.3 - Sinking

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 269:2015Ordinary Portland Cement - Specification
→
IS 1786:2008High Strength Deformed Steel Bars and Wires f...
→
IS 383:2016Coarse and Fine Aggregates for Concrete - Spe...
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is a concrete monolith in this context?+
A large, hollow concrete box-like structure, often with internal cells, that is sunk into the ground to act as a foundation or part of a heavy marine structure like a quay wall.
How is a monolith sunk into the ground?+
It is sunk under its own weight by excavating soil from within its hollow cells, a process detailed in Clause 6.3. Sometimes, additional weight (kentledge) is added to assist sinking.
What are the primary design checks for a monolith?+
The main stability checks involve ensuring an adequate factor of safety against overturning and sliding under all design load combinations, and verifying that the bearing pressure on the foundation soil is within permissible limits (Clause 5.3).
What is 'hearting' of a monolith?+
Hearting is the process of filling the hollow cells of the monolith with a suitable material (like sand, gravel, or lean concrete) after it has been sunk to its final depth, to provide mass and stability (Clause 6.4).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →