BOQ Builder·Auto-BOQ from dimensions, DSR ratesNEW→BidEasy·Government tenders, searchableLIVE→InfraLens App·Free on Play Store, offline-readyNEW→

IRC SP 54 : 2000Project Preparation Manual for Bridges

Q: What does a bridge DPR contain?

Per IRC SP:54: 1) Topographic survey (1:1000), 2) Hydrographic survey, 3) Hydrological study (HFL, discharge, scour), 4) Geotechnical investigation (bore logs, lab tests), 5) Traffic study, 6) Type selection, 7) Structural design, 8) GAD drawing, 9) Detailed drawings, 10) BOQ and estimate.

Q: How many bore holes for a bridge?

Minimum 3: one at each abutment + one at deepest pier. For bridges >100m, additional at intermediate piers. Depth: min 1.5× expected foundation depth or until hard rock.

PDF Google Compare IRC Portal

Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details

International Comparison — Coming Soon

CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeTransportation · Bridges and Bridge Engineering

PDF Google Compare IRC Portal

Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details

IRC SP 54:2000 is the Indian Standard (IRC) for project preparation manual for bridges. IRC SP:54 is the checklist for bridge DPR preparation — tells consultants exactly what surveys, investigations, designs, drawings, and estimates are needed for a complete bridge project report. Used by every bridge design consultant in India.

Manual for preparation of Detailed Project Reports (DPR) for bridge projects covering survey, investigation, design, drawings, estimates, and documentation.

Quick Reference — IRC SP 54:2000 Bridge DPR Manual

Key reference values — verify against the current code edition / project specification.

✓ Verified 2026-05-15

Reference	Value	Clause
Subject	Detailed Project Report preparation for bridges	Scope
Covers	Survey, investigation, hydrology, design, drawings, estimate	Scope
Hydrology	Design discharge, scour, waterway, freeboard	Inputs
Output	Bankable bridge DPR	Deliverable
Read with	IRC 5 / IRC SP 13 (small bridges) / IRC 78	Cross-ref

⚠ Indicative reference values from the code/standard practice; binding figures are those in the current edition and the project specification.

Overview

Status: Current
Usage level: Frequently Used
Domain: Transportation — Bridges and Bridge Engineering
Type: Code of Practice

Typically used with

IS 5 IRC 6 IRC 78 IRC 112 IS 1892

Also on InfraLens for IRC SP 54

24Key values 13Tables 15FAQs

Practical Notes

! IRC SP:54 is the DPR CHECKLIST — follow it and your report won't be rejected.

! Most common DPR rejection: insufficient bore holes, missing HFL data, incomplete GAD.

! Hydrological data (HFL, design discharge) is the MOST CRITICAL input — verify from CWC.

! Minimum 3 bore holes: 2 at abutments + 1 at deepest pier.

! Always include alternative bridge types in type selection — justify chosen type.

! Cost estimate must follow MoRTH/State SOR rates.

! Always cross-verify hydrological data from multiple sources, including local knowledge and historical records, not just relying on standard tables.

! For sub-soil investigations, ensure sampling is representative of the ground conditions at founding depth. Geotechnical engineers' input is critical here.

! When selecting bridge type, consider constructability, long-term maintenance, and local environmental conditions. Don't just go for the cheapest or most aesthetically pleasing option initially.

! Thoroughly document all survey data, especially topographical surveys, to avoid discrepancies during the construction phase.

! In seismic zones, ensure adequate seismic design considerations are incorporated from the preliminary stage, including appropriate detailing for ductility.

! Pay close attention to scour investigations; it's a leading cause of bridge failures. Account for afflux and debris accumulation.

! The selection of bearings is crucial for load transfer and accommodating movements. Consult bearing manufacturers early in the design process.

! For concrete mix design, ensure workability is adequate for placement in congested reinforcement areas without compromising strength.

! Always check for the adequacy of pile foundations against lateral loads and scour effects.

! Consider constructability issues for substructure elements, especially in deep water or difficult terrain.

! The design of expansion joints and bearings should be coordinated to ensure proper functioning throughout the bridge's life.

! During the DPR preparation, conduct a thorough traffic survey to accurately assess the design live load requirements.

! For bridges in coastal areas, specify corrosion-resistant materials and adequate concrete cover to prevent premature deterioration.

! Always factor in appropriate load factors and resistance factors as per IRC for all limit state design checks.

! Ensure proper drainage arrangements are incorporated in the superstructure design to prevent waterlogging and its associated issues.

Frequently referenced clauses

Ch. 2 — Preliminary survey and investigation

Ch. 3 — Hydrological investigation

Ch. 4 — Geotechnical investigation

Ch. 5 — Bridge type selection

Ch. 6 — Design and drawings

Ch. 7 — Cost estimation

Cl. 2.1 — Scope of the Manual

Cl. 3.1 — General requirements for surveys

Cl. 4.1 — Hydrological and Hydraulic investigations

Cl. 5.1 — Sub-soil investigations

Cl. 6.1 — Selection of bridge type

Cl. 7.1 — Loads and forces

Cl. 8.1 — Design of substructure

Cl. 9.1 — Design of superstructure

Cl. 10.1 — Bearings

bridge DPRproject reportbridge surveybridge investigationIRC SP

Engineer's Notes

In Practice — Editorial Commentary

When IRC SP 54 is your governing code

IRC SP 54 (2000) is the Project Preparation Manual for Bridges — the IRC's framework for systematically preparing the DPR (Detailed Project Report) for a road bridge project. It covers the full preparation cycle: from initial feasibility to detailed design + tender documentation. It is a companion to IRC:SP-19:2001 (road DPR) but specifically for bridge projects.

Use IRC SP 54 when you are: - Preparing DPR for a new road bridge (NH, SH, district, urban) - Doing bridge rehabilitation DPR for older structures - Specifying DPR scope + deliverables for a consultant - Reviewing bridge DPR for adequacy + completeness - Managing a bridge project from concept through tender - Doing bridge replacement / reconstruction DPR

What IRC SP 54 covers: - Pre-feasibility + feasibility study scope - Investigation requirements (hydrological, geotechnical, traffic) - Alternative alignment analysis + selection - Bridge type selection (slab / box / truss / segmental) - Foundation type selection - Detailed design scope - Construction sequencing + traffic management - Cost estimation + financial analysis - Environmental + social impact - Tender documentation - Quality assurance + control - Performance specifications

IRC SP 54 sits at the project-management end of bridge engineering — distinguishing it from technical IRC documents which cover specific aspects of design + construction.

DPR workflow + investigations

DPR workflow stages:

1. Pre-feasibility: quick assessment; multiple alignment options; rough cost; environmental screening 2. Feasibility study: alignment optimisation; preliminary design; cost-benefit analysis 3. DPR: detailed design + drawings + tender documents 4. Tender + award: documentation for procurement 5. Construction: design refinement + as-built documentation 6. Post-construction: O&M manual + handover

Required investigations:

Hydrological survey: - Design flood (100-year typical, 50-year for less-critical) - Hydraulic gradient + cross-sections - Maximum scour level (general + local) - Sediment + bed-load characteristics - Tidal + flood-plain analysis (coastal / estuarine)

Geotechnical investigation: - Boreholes (one per pier + abutment minimum; spacing 25-50 m for major bridge) - SPT every 1-1.5 m - Lab tests: density, shear strength, consolidation, sulphate - Rock cores at foundation level - Groundwater investigation - Site-specific seismic + liquefaction assessment

Topographic survey: - Total station + DGPS along alignment - Cross-sections every 20-25 m (closer at key features) - Existing structures + utilities mapping - ROW + land boundary survey

Traffic survey: - Classified vehicle counts (NHAI / state methodology) - Origin-Destination survey (if rerouting affects flow) - Pedestrian + cyclist counts (urban contexts) - Future demand forecasting

Environmental + social: - Forest land + wildlife corridors identification - River ecology + fisheries assessment - Settlement + R&R requirements - Heritage / cultural site protection - Per IRC:SP-93:2017 framework

Material + utility survey: - Existing utilities (water, sewer, electric, telecom) mapping - Local material sources (aggregates, sand, concrete plants, steel) - Disposal sites for excavation material - Construction access routes

Reference values + DPR deliverables

Standard DPR deliverables (per IRC SP 54):

Volume 1 — Executive Summary + Approval Papers: - Project description + justification - Alternative comparisons - Cost summary - Environmental + social impact summary - Recommendations - Statutory clearance status

Volume 2 — Technical Reports: - Hydrological study report - Geotechnical investigation report - Traffic study report - Environmental + social impact report - Topographic survey report - Material investigation report

Volume 3 — Design Reports: - Alignment + general arrangement drawings - Bridge type comparison + selection - Foundation design report - Superstructure design report - Substructure design report - Bearing + joint design report - Construction methodology - Quality assurance plan

Volume 4 — Construction Drawings: - General arrangement (Plan + Elevation + Sections) - Foundation drawings (location, dimensions, reinforcement) - Substructure drawings (piers, abutments, pier caps) - Superstructure drawings (beams, slabs, segments) - Bearing + joint detail - Approach embankment + protection works - Drainage details - Lighting + signage

Volume 5 — BOQ + Specifications: - Bill of Quantities (BOQ) - Technical specifications (referencing IRC + IS codes) - Manufacturer specifications - Material approval procedures

Volume 6 — Tender Documents: - Tender form - Conditions of contract - Special conditions - Schedule of rates - Quality assurance requirements - Traffic management plan

Volume 7 — Cost Analysis + Financial: - Detailed cost breakdown - Cost-benefit analysis (CBR / NPV / IRR) - Phasing + financing - Cash flow projection

Volume 8 — Schedule + Implementation: - Project timeline (PERT/CPM) - Construction sequence - Resource requirements - Procurement timeline - Risk register

Key technical inputs per bridge type:

| Bridge Type | Span Range | Reference Code | |---|---|---| | RCC slab | up to 15 m | IRC:21:2000, IRC:112:2020 | | RCC T-beam | 8-25 m | IRC:21:2000, IRC:112:2020 | | PSC I-girder | 15-40 m | IRC:112:2020 | | PSC box girder | 25-100 m | IRC:SP-65:2005, IRC:SP-66:2016 | | Steel truss | 30-100 m | IRC:24:2010 | | Steel girder | 30-60 m | IRC:24:2010 | | Suspension / cable-stayed | 100+ m | Specialist design |

DPR timeline (typical): - Pre-feasibility: 2-3 months - Feasibility: 4-6 months - DPR: 8-12 months - Total: 18-24 months for major bridge

Companion codes (must pair with)

IRC:5:2015 — General Features of Design.
IRC:6:2017 — Loads + Stresses.
IRC:7:2017 — Substructure + Wearing Coat.
IRC:78:2014 — Foundations.
IRC:83:2018 — Direct Foundations.
IRC:24:2010 — Steel Bridges.
IRC:112:2020 — Concrete Bridges.
IRC:21:2000 — Older RCC Bridges (reference).
IRC:19:2005 — Hinge + Expansion Joints.
IRC:47:2018 — Fatigue Design.
IRC:SP-13:2004 — Small Bridges + Culverts.
IRC:SP-19:2001 — Road DPR Manual (sister document).
IRC:SP-37:2010 — Load Carrying Capacity.
IRC:SP-51:2015 — Load Testing.
IRC:SP-71:2018 — Steel Bridge Inspection.
IRC:SP-74:2007 — Steel Bridge Rehabilitation.
IRC:SP-65:2005 — Segmental Bridges.
IRC:SP-66:2016 — Continuous Bridges.
IRC:SP-77:2008 — Expansion Joints.
IRC:SP-80:2008 — Concrete Bridge Corrosion.
IRC:SP-93:2017 — Environmental Clearance.
IS 456:2000 — Plain + Reinforced Concrete.
IS 800:2007 — Steel Construction.
IS 1893 (Part 1) — Earthquake Resistant Design.
MoRTH Specifications for Road and Bridge Works.
NHAI Manual of Standards.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications + Manual for Bridge Evaluation.

Common pitfalls / what reviewers flag

1. Inadequate hydrological data. Design flood under-estimated; scour low; bridge undermined. Use 100-year flood + safety margin. 2. Geotechnical investigation insufficient. One borehole; soil variability missed; foundation issues. Per-pier boreholes. 3. Single alternative considered. Only one alignment + bridge type; suboptimal selected. 3-5 alternatives required. 4. Cost-benefit incomplete. Direct costs only; user-cost savings + safety not included. Full economic analysis. 5. Environmental clearance delayed. Discovered during construction; project stopped. Clearance pre-DPR. 6. Land acquisition not factored. R&R cost under-estimated; project budget inadequate. Per Land Acquisition Act 2013 + R&R Rules. 7. Utility relocation skipped. Existing utilities discovered during construction; delays + cost. Pre-DPR utility survey. 8. Construction traffic management absent. During-construction traffic ignored; safety + delay issues. Detailed plan required. 9. Material sources not identified. Construction starts; material unavailable locally; cost explosion. Pre-DPR material study. 10. Schedule unrealistic. Aggressive timeline; over-runs guaranteed. Use PERT/CPM realistic; include weather + clearance delays. 11. Quality assurance plan missing. Construction quality assumed; inspection regimes not specified. Comprehensive QA + QC plan. 12. Specification ambiguity. Tender includes 'best practice' but no specific reference; disputes during construction. Reference specific IRC + IS codes. 13. Bridge type chosen by familiarity. Designer's preference without technical justification; suboptimal type. Technical comparison mandatory. 14. No risk register. Risks not identified; surprises during construction. Comprehensive risk register + mitigation. 15. As-built records not planned. Construction proceeds; as-built drawings not prepared; future maintenance uncertain. As-built specification in tender. 16. No life-cycle cost analysis. Construction cost minimum; O&M cost ignored; high lifecycle cost. LCC analysis mandatory. 17. Traffic survey at single day. AADT not representative; design demand wrong. Multi-day, multi-season survey. 18. Tender documentation incomplete. Specifications + drawings not aligned; ambiguity + disputes. Coordinated documentation.

Where it sits in bridge-project lifecycle

Bridge DPR project — IRC SP 54 touchpoints:

1. Pre-feasibility study (2-3 months): - Identify need + concept - Multiple alignment options - Rough cost estimate - Environmental screening - Approval to proceed

2. Feasibility study (4-6 months): - Hydrological reconnaissance - Geotechnical preliminary - Alignment optimisation - Bridge type comparison - Cost-benefit analysis - Environmental impact assessment (initial) - Project feasibility report - Approval to proceed to DPR

3. DPR preparation (8-12 months): - Detailed hydrological study - Comprehensive geotechnical investigation - Final alignment + topographic survey - Bridge type selection + detailed design - Foundation design - Superstructure design - Substructure design - Bearing + joint design - Drainage + appurtenance design - Approach embankment + protection works - Construction methodology - Cost estimation - Tender documentation

4. Approval cycle: - DPR submitted to client - Review + clarifications - Statutory clearances (environmental, forest, land) - Financial approval - Approval to tender

5. Tender + Award: - Tender published - Bidders' clarifications - Bid evaluation - Award of contract

6. Construction (varies, typically 2-5 years for major bridges): - Pre-construction setup - Foundation construction - Substructure construction - Superstructure erection - Approach works - Finishing + inspection

7. Pre-opening: - Load testing (per IRC:SP-51:2015) - Safety audit - Approach + drainage verification - Commissioning + opening

8. Operations + maintenance: - Annual visual inspection - 5-year detailed inspection - Rehabilitation cycle - Long-term asset management

9. As-built + handover: - As-built drawings - O&M manual - Spare parts inventory - Maintenance contract

IRC SP 54 is the systematic project-preparation guide for India's bridge engineering industry — invoked on every NH/SH bridge DPR, every major urban flyover, every river-crossing bridge.

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards

Key Differences

Key Similarities

Parameter Comparison

Parameter	IS Value	International	Source

⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values24

Quick Reference Values

Minimum bore holes3 per bridge location

Bore depthMin 1.5× expected foundation depth

HFL data sourceCWC or State Irrigation Department

Design flood return period50 years major, 25 years minor

Survey scale1:1000 for bridge site plan

Cross-section interval50m upstream/downstream of bridge

Minimum vertical clearance for bridges over roads5.0 m (for State Highways and Major District Roads)

Minimum vertical clearance for bridges over railways (BG)7.5 m (from highest point of rail)

Standard camber for concrete bridges1 in 50

Maximum permissible deflection for simply supported PSC girder bridges (Span <= 30 m)Span/500

Maximum permissible deflection for continuous PSC girder bridges (Span <= 30 m)Span/750

Minimum abutment founding depth below scour level1.5 m

Maximum span for culverts6.0 m

Minimum bearing area for elastomeric bearingsAs per Table 17

Minimum concrete cover to reinforcement in aggressive environments (coastal areas)50 mm

Minimum grade of concrete for substructure elementsM20

Minimum grade of concrete for superstructure elementsM25

Maximum aggregate size for M25 concrete20 mm

Permissible shear stress in concrete (M25, beam)0.5 N/mm²

Coefficient of friction for foundation design (rock)0.5

Minimum freeboard for road bridges over rivers1.0 m above HFL

Design flood discharge for major bridges100-year flood

Load combination factor for Dead Load + Live Load1.5

Load combination factor for Dead Load + Live Load + Wind Load1.2

Key Formulas

Effective span for simply supported beams = Clear span + Average of end bearings widths

Equivalent uniformly distributed load (UDL) for IRC Class AA loading

Design shear force (V_u) = Factor for dead load * Dead load + Factor for live load * Live load + Other loads

Bending moment (M_u) = Factor for dead load * Dead load moment + Factor for live load * Live load moment

Scour depth (D_s) = 1.5 D for alluvial deposits (where D is the maximum scour depth predicted by Lacey's formula)

Bearing capacity (q) = Factor of safety * Applied load / Bearing area

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables

Table 1 — Contents of preliminary survey report

Table 2 — Contents of hydrological investigation

Table 3 — Contents of geotechnical investigation

Table 4 — Contents of structural design report

Table 5 — Drawings required in DPR

Table 1 — Categorisation of bridges based on span

Table 2 — Minimum requirements for hydrological data

Table 3 — Recommended bore hole depths

Table 4 — Typical values of soil properties

Table 5 — Recommended seismic zones for India

Table 6 — Live loads for highway bridges

Table 7 — Permissible stresses in concrete

Table 17 — Minimum bearing area for elastomeric bearings

Frequently Asked Questions15

What does a bridge DPR contain?+

Per IRC SP:54: 1) Topographic survey (1:1000), 2) Hydrographic survey, 3) Hydrological study (HFL, discharge, scour), 4) Geotechnical investigation (bore logs, lab tests), 5) Traffic study, 6) Type selection, 7) Structural design, 8) GAD drawing, 9) Detailed drawings, 10) BOQ and estimate.

How many bore holes for a bridge?+

Minimum 3: one at each abutment + one at deepest pier. For bridges >100m, additional at intermediate piers. Depth: min 1.5× expected foundation depth or until hard rock.

Most common DPR mistake?+

Insufficient hydrological data — using assumed HFL instead of verified CWC data. Second: inadequate geotechnical investigation (too few bore holes, too shallow). These lead to wrong foundation design.

What is the primary purpose of IRC SP 54:2000?+

IRC SP 54:2000, the Project Preparation Manual for Bridges, serves as a comprehensive guide for the preparation of Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) for bridge projects in India. It outlines the procedures and requirements for various stages of bridge project preparation, including surveys, investigations, design, drawings, and cost estimation.

What are the key considerations for hydrological and hydraulic investigations as per this manual?+

The manual emphasizes the importance of accurate hydrological and hydraulic investigations to determine the design flood discharge and scour levels. This includes analyzing rainfall data, river discharge records, catchment characteristics, and conducting hydraulic modeling to ensure adequate waterway and freeboard, preventing bridge failures due to floods.

How does IRC SP 54:2000 address sub-soil investigations for bridge foundations?+

IRC SP 54:2000 mandates thorough sub-soil investigations to ascertain the soil strata and its engineering properties. This involves techniques like boreholes, in-situ testing, and laboratory testing to determine bearing capacity, settlement characteristics, and potential for liquefaction, which are critical for safe foundation design.

What are the essential components of a bridge DPR as per this code?+

A bridge DPR, as per IRC SP 54:2000, must include detailed sections on site reconnaissance, topographical and hydrological surveys, sub-soil investigations, selection of bridge type, preliminary and detailed design of substructure and superstructure, structural analysis, drawings, cost estimates, environmental impact assessment, and a construction methodology.

What guidance does the manual provide on the selection of bridge types?+

The manual provides a systematic approach to selecting the most appropriate bridge type based on factors such as span length, site conditions (topography, geology, hydraulics), traffic requirements, material availability, cost-effectiveness, and constructability. It encourages consideration of various options like girder bridges, arch bridges, and suspension bridges.

How are loads and forces addressed in the DPR preparation according to IRC SP 54:2000?+

The manual guides the identification and quantification of all relevant loads and forces that a bridge might experience, including dead loads, live loads (IRC Class AA, Class A, etc.), wind loads, seismic loads, and thermal forces. It specifies the load combinations and factors to be used for design as per relevant IRC codes.

What is the significance of seismic investigations in the DPR for bridges in India?+

For bridges located in seismic zones, IRC SP 54:2000 mandates comprehensive seismic investigations to assess earthquake hazards. This includes determining seismic zone factors, potential ground accelerations, and incorporating seismic design principles to ensure the bridge's resilience and prevent catastrophic failure during an earthquake.

How does the manual guide the preparation of estimates for bridge projects?+

The manual outlines the process of preparing detailed cost estimates for bridge projects, which include quantities of various construction materials, labor, machinery, and overheads. It emphasizes the need for accurate quantity take-off from the design drawings and the application of appropriate rates.

What are the common issues encountered during DPR preparation for bridges in India, and how does this manual help?+

Common issues include insufficient site investigations, inaccurate hydrological data, overlooking constructability challenges, and unrealistic cost estimations. IRC SP 54:2000 provides a standardized framework and checklist, promoting a more thorough and systematic approach, thereby minimizing these issues and leading to better-prepared DPRs.

Does the manual cover aspects of environmental and social impact assessment for bridge projects?+

Yes, the manual recognizes the importance of environmental and social considerations. It directs the inclusion of preliminary assessments of potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures, as well as social aspects related to land acquisition and community engagement, which are crucial for sustainable project development.

What is the role of this manual in relation to other IRC codes for bridge design?+

IRC SP 54:2000 acts as a procedural and organizational framework for preparing bridge DPRs. It guides engineers on what information needs to be collected and presented, and then references specific IRC codes (like IRC: 21 for loads, IRC: 112 for concrete design, IRC: 24 for steel bridges) for the detailed design calculations and standards.

How does this manual ensure that the prepared DPRs are suitable for highway authorities like NHAI and MoRTH?+

The manual aligns with the general requirements and expectations of major highway authorities such as NHAI and MoRTH by providing a structured and comprehensive approach to project preparation. Following its guidelines ensures that the DPRs are technically sound, complete, and meet the necessary regulatory and approval standards for these organizations.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋

QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.

Browse all 300 templates →

BOQ Builder·Auto-BOQ from dimensions, DSR ratesNEW→BidEasy·Government tenders, searchableLIVE→InfraLens App·Free on Play Store, offline-readyNEW→

IRC SP 54 : 2000Project Preparation Manual for Bridges

PDF Google Compare IRC Portal

Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details

International Comparison — Coming Soon

CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeTransportation · Bridges and Bridge Engineering

PDF Google Compare IRC Portal

Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details

Manual for preparation of Detailed Project Reports (DPR) for bridge projects covering survey, investigation, design, drawings, estimates, and documentation.

Quick Reference — IRC SP 54:2000 Bridge DPR Manual

Key reference values — verify against the current code edition / project specification.

✓ Verified 2026-05-15

Reference	Value	Clause
Subject	Detailed Project Report preparation for bridges	Scope
Covers	Survey, investigation, hydrology, design, drawings, estimate	Scope
Hydrology	Design discharge, scour, waterway, freeboard	Inputs
Output	Bankable bridge DPR	Deliverable
Read with	IRC 5 / IRC SP 13 (small bridges) / IRC 78	Cross-ref

⚠ Indicative reference values from the code/standard practice; binding figures are those in the current edition and the project specification.

Overview

Status: Current
Usage level: Frequently Used
Domain: Transportation — Bridges and Bridge Engineering
Type: Code of Practice