InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLens
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join Channel
Join
HomeIS CodesIRCHandbookDesign RulesPMCQA/QCBIMGATE PrepArticlesToolsAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
IRC 36 : 2010

Recommended Practice for the Construction of Earth Embankments for Road Works

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Section 10 - Embankments) · EN 13242 (Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials used in civil engineering work and for road construction) · ASTM D698 (Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort)
CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeTransportation · Roads and Pavement
PDFGoogleIRC Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
Summary

This IRC code outlines best practices for constructing stable and durable earth embankments, crucial for road infrastructure. It emphasizes material selection based on soil properties, particularly plasticity and shear strength, and details rigorous compaction requirements to achieve specified densities and prevent future settlement. The code also addresses construction techniques such as layer thickness, moisture content control, and placement methods, along with essential quality control measures like field density tests and moisture content checks. Adherence to these guidelines is vital for ensuring the long-term performance and safety of road networks.

This IRC code provides recommended practices for the construction of earth embankments for road works. It covers materials, compaction, construction methods, and quality control to ensure the stability and durability of embankments.

Key Values
maximum layer thickness uncompacted0.30 meters
maximum layer thickness compacted0.20 meters
optimum moisture content rangeOMC +/- 2%
Practical Notes
! Always conduct laboratory tests to determine the suitability of borrow pit materials and their optimum moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density (MDD).
! Ensure the foundation soil is adequately prepared by clearing vegetation, topsoil, and any loose or unsuitable material. Compaction of the foundation layer might be necessary.
! The moisture content of the embankment fill should be maintained within +/- 2% of the OMC to achieve desired compaction.
! Spreading of fill material should be done in uniform layers of specified thickness (uncompacted).
! Compaction should be carried out with appropriate equipment, ensuring coverage of the entire surface area and achieving the specified number of passes.
! In areas with limited space for heavy compaction equipment, use of vibratory plates or hand-operated rammers may be permitted.
! Regular field density tests are crucial to verify that the in-situ dry density meets the specified requirements.
! If the moisture content is too low, water should be added uniformly. If too high, the material should be aerated or sun-dried.
! Avoid constructing embankments during heavy rainfall. If unavoidable, take measures to protect the exposed surfaces and deposited material.
! For embankments exceeding certain heights or on slopes, stability analysis should be performed, and side slopes may need to be flatter or reinforced.
! Careful consideration of drainage around and within the embankment is essential to prevent saturation and loss of strength.
! The top surface of the embankment should be shaped to facilitate drainage away from the road carriageway.
! Continuity of compaction across different layers is important to avoid differential settlement.
! The plasticity index (PI) of the soil used for embankment fill should generally not exceed 15. However, specific zones might have stricter requirements.
! Selected fill material, often used in the upper layers or near structures, should have a Plasticity Index (PI) typically not exceeding 10.
Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 110:2017Ready Mixed Paint, Brushing, Red Oxide, Primi...
→
Earth EmbankmentsRoad ConstructionHighway EngineeringSoil CompactionMaterial SelectionQuality ControlGeotechnical EngineeringIndian StandardsRoad WorksIRC
📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →
Similar International Standards
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Section 10 - Embankments)
MediumCurrent
EN 13242 (Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials used in civil engineering work and for road construction)
MediumCurrent
ASTM D698 (Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort)
MediumCurrent
ASTM D1557 (Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort)
MediumCurrent
Key Differences
≠
≠
≠
≠
≠
Key Similarities
≈
≈
≈
≈
≈
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Compaction Energy (kJ/m³)
Minimum Dry Density (% of MDD)
Maximum Plasticity Index (PI)
Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) Tolerance
Layer Thickness (Compacted, meters)
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use
Quick Reference Values
maximum layer thickness uncompacted0.30 meters
maximum layer thickness compacted0.20 meters
optimum moisture content rangeOMC +/- 2%
minimum compaction effort standard proctor27 blows per layer
minimum compaction effort modified proctor56 blows per layer
minimum dry density as percentage of std proctor95%
minimum dry density as percentage of mod proctor97%
maximum plasticity index for embankment fill15
maximum percentage fines passing 75 micron sieve for selected fill35%
minimum angle of repose for uncompacted fill35 degrees
allowable settlement short term25 mm
allowable settlement long term50 mm
cohesion requirement for granular fillMinimum 10 kPa
standard proctor energy600 kJ/m³
modified proctor energy2700 kJ/m³
maximum permissible slope for embankment side1V:2H (typically)
minimum freeboard above high flood level1.0 meter
Key Formulas
Dry Density = (Mass of Dry Soil) / (Total Volume)
Moisture Content (%) = [(Mass of Wet Soil - Mass of Dry Soil) / Mass of Dry Soil] * 100
Energy per blow = (Weight of Hammer * Height of Drop) / Volume of Mould
Energy per blow = (Weight of Hammer * Height of Drop) / Volume of Mould
Key Tables
Table 1: Classification of Soils for Embankment Fill
Table 2: Compaction Requirements based on Compaction Method
Table 3: Permissible Moisture Content Range around OMC
Table 4: Material Properties for Selected Fill
Table 5: Guidelines for Compaction Equipment
Table 6: Sampling Frequencies for Field Density Tests
Key Clauses
Clause 2: Materials for Embankments
Clause 3: Preparation of Foundation
Clause 4: Construction of Embankments (General)
Clause 5: Compaction of Embankments
Clause 6: Moisture Content Control
Clause 7: Placement of Embankment Material
Clause 8: Testing and Quality Control
Clause 9: Measurement and Payment
Clause 10: Safety Precautions
What is the primary purpose of IRC: SP: 35?+
The primary purpose of IRC: SP: 35 (Recommended Practice for the Construction of Earth Embankments for Road Works) is to provide a standardized and detailed set of guidelines for engineers and construction professionals involved in building safe, stable, and durable earth embankments. It aims to ensure that the material used, the methods of construction, and the quality control measures implemented lead to an embankment that can withstand the intended loads and environmental conditions over its service life, thereby contributing to the overall longevity and safety of road infrastructure.
What are the key material properties that IRC: SP: 35 focuses on for embankment fill?+
IRC: SP: 35 places significant emphasis on several material properties. These include the soil's gradation (particle size distribution), plasticity characteristics (Plasticity Index - PI, Liquid Limit - LL), optimum moisture content (OMC) for achieving maximum dry density (MDD), and shear strength parameters (cohesion and angle of internal friction). The code often specifies limits for PI and fines content, particularly for selected fill materials used in critical zones, to ensure adequate strength and resistance to volume change.
How does the code address moisture control during embankment construction?+
Moisture control is a critical aspect covered by IRC: SP: 35. The code mandates that the moisture content of the fill material be maintained within a specified range, typically close to the Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) determined from laboratory compaction tests, usually within +/- 2% of OMC. This precise control is essential because too little moisture will prevent proper compaction, while too much moisture can lead to instability and reduced strength. The code outlines methods for adding water or aerating the soil as needed.
What are the typical compaction requirements outlined in the code?+
IRC: SP: 35 specifies rigorous compaction requirements to achieve a desired degree of densification. It mandates that the in-situ dry density of each compacted layer should not be less than a certain percentage of the maximum dry density (MDD) determined by either Standard Proctor or Modified Proctor tests. Commonly, minimum densities required are 95% of Standard Proctor MDD or 97% of Modified Proctor MDD, depending on the compactive effort applied. The code also specifies the number of passes for different types of compaction equipment to ensure uniform densification.
What quality control measures are emphasized in this recommended practice?+
Quality control is a cornerstone of IRC: SP: 35. The code details several essential tests, including laboratory tests for determining OMC and MDD, and field density tests (e.g., sand cone method, nuclear densometer) to verify the in-situ dry density of compacted layers. Moisture content of the fill material is also frequently checked. The frequency of these field tests is specified to ensure that the entire embankment meets the design requirements. Visual inspection for layer uniformity and surface finish is also important.
What are the implications of using unsuitable materials for embankment construction?+
Using unsuitable materials can lead to significant problems like excessive settlement, loss of bearing capacity, slope instability, and erosion. For instance, highly plastic clays can shrink and swell with changes in moisture content, causing differential settlement and cracking of the road pavement. Organic soils are highly compressible and prone to decomposition. IRC: SP: 35 aims to prevent these issues by defining strict criteria for material selection, often prohibiting the use of such soils in embankment construction or specifying their use only in non-critical zones with appropriate mitigation measures.
How does the code address embankment construction in areas with poor foundation conditions?+
When embankments are to be constructed on poor foundation soils, IRC: SP: 35 emphasizes thorough foundation preparation. This typically involves removing unsuitable topsoil and highly compressible layers. Depending on the severity of the poor foundation condition, methods like preloading, vertical drains, or soil improvement techniques might be recommended or required. The code also highlights the need for stability analyses to ensure the embankment does not cause excessive shear stress in the underlying weak layers, potentially leading to bearing capacity failure or slope instability.
What is the role of side slopes in embankment stability according to this code?+
The side slopes of an embankment are crucial for its stability, particularly against rotational slips. IRC: SP: 35 provides guidelines on permissible side slopes based on the soil type and embankment height. Generally, flatter slopes offer greater stability. For common granular fills, slopes of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal (1V:2H) are often considered adequate. However, for very high embankments or in seismic zones, more detailed stability analyses are required, and flatter slopes or specific stabilization measures like retaining walls or gabions might be necessary.
Does IRC: SP: 35 cover drainage requirements for embankments?+
Yes, drainage is an important consideration. While the primary focus is on construction, the code implicitly and sometimes explicitly addresses drainage to prevent saturation. Proper shaping of the embankment's top surface to shed water away from the carriageway and along the sides is crucial. Adequate side drainage to intercept surface runoff and prevent it from flowing down the embankment face is also vital to maintain stability. For larger embankments or specific site conditions, more detailed hydraulic design might be needed.
What are the implications for settlement? Are there limits specified?+
IRC: SP: 35 acknowledges that some settlement is inevitable in earth embankments. The code implicitly aims to minimize excessive or differential settlement through proper material selection and rigorous compaction. While not always explicitly stating settlement limits for the embankment itself, the ultimate goal is to ensure that any settlement that occurs is within acceptable tolerances for the overlying road pavement. For structures built on or near embankments, specific settlement monitoring and control measures might be required based on project-specific designs.