InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 2974 Part 1 : 1980Code of practice for surveying instruments - Part 1: Levels

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
ISO 17123-2 · BS ISO 17123-2
CurrentSpecializedCode of PracticeBIMGeotechnical · Surveying and Geotechnical Investigation
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues3InternationalTablesFAQ3Related

IS 2974:1980 Part 1 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for surveying instruments - part 1: levels. IS 2974 is the primary Indian Standard for the design and construction of machine foundations (Note: the input title referring to 'surveying instruments' is a known misnomer in some datasets). Part 1 specifically covers foundations for reciprocating type machines, providing guidelines on dynamic analysis, permissible vibration amplitudes, and structural detailing to prevent resonance.

Lays down general and specific requirements for various types of levels used in surveying.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Geotechnical — Surveying and Geotechnical Investigation
Type
Code of Practice
International equivalents
ISO 17123-2:2001 · ISO (International Organization for Standardization), InternationalBS ISO 17123-2:2001 · BSI (British Standards Institution), United Kingdom
Typically used with
IS 456IS 1893IS 1904
Also on InfraLens for IS 2974
3Key values1Tables3FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! Ensure the natural frequency of the foundation system avoids the machine's operating frequency by at least 20% to prevent resonance.
! Dynamic soil properties (like dynamic shear modulus) must be evaluated properly prior to design using field tests such as block vibration tests.
! The center of gravity of the machine and the foundation should ideally lie on the same vertical axis to prevent coupled rocking and sliding modes.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 4Design CriteriaCl. 5Dynamic AnalysisCl. 6Structural Detailing
Pulled from IS 2974:1980. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
reinforced concretesteel

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
ISO 17123-2:2001ISO (International Organization for Standardization), International
HighCurrent
Optics and optical instruments — Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments — Part 2: Levels
Specifies field procedures for determining and evaluating the precision of surveying levels, which is the primary goal of the tests in IS 2974.
BS ISO 17123-2:2001BSI (British Standards Institution), United Kingdom
HighCurrent
Optics and optical instruments. Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments. Levels
The UK's direct adoption of the ISO standard, making it technically identical and the formal equivalent in the UK.
BS 7334-3:1990BSI (British Standards Institution), United Kingdom
MediumWithdrawn
Measuring instruments for building construction. Methods for determining accuracy in use. Levels
A precursor to the ISO standard that provided methods for checking level accuracy, similar in intent to IS 2974 but now outdated.
DIN 18723-2:1986DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung), Germany
MediumWithdrawn
Field procedures for testing surveying instruments; part 2: levels
The former German national standard for testing levels, which contributed to the development of the unified ISO standard.
Key Differences
≠IS 2974 classifies levels into grades ('Precision', 'Engineers', 'Builders') with prescriptive requirements. ISO 17123-2 provides a universal test procedure to determine the actual precision (standard deviation) of any given instrument, rather than classifying it.
≠The Indian standard is based on optical-mechanical instruments of the 1980s and describes manual adjustments. The ISO standard is method-based, making it equally applicable to modern digital/electronic levels and focusing on performance verification over physical adjustment steps.
≠IS 2974 specifies requirements for individual components like level vial sensitivity and telescope magnification. ISO 17123-2 treats the level as a complete system and evaluates its overall performance, with component characteristics being the manufacturer's responsibility.
≠The methodology in IS 2974 for tests like the 'two-peg test' is largely procedural. ISO 17123-2 formalizes these tests with a rigorous statistical approach, calculating standard deviations and confidence intervals to evaluate the results.
Key Similarities
≈Both standards share the fundamental purpose of providing a standardized method to check and ensure the accuracy of surveying levels in the field.
≈The core principle of the 'two-peg test' for checking collimation error described in IS 2974 is conceptually identical to the field test setup used in ISO 17123-2 to determine the line-of-sight error.
≈Both standards implicitly or explicitly recognize the importance of good field practice, such as ensuring a stable instrument setup, using identical and stable turning points (pegs), and minimizing atmospheric effects.
≈The primary performance indicator in both standards is ultimately the accuracy of height determination over a distance, expressed in IS 2974 and calculated via ISO 17123-2 as a standard deviation for 1 km of double-run levelling.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Primary Accuracy MetricStandard deviation for 1 km double levelling (e.g., ± 1 mm for Precision Levels)A procedure to determine the standard deviation per 1 km double-run levelling (S_ΔH_D)ISO 17123-2:2001
Instrument ClassificationPrescribes three classes: Precision, Engineers', and Builders'/Dumpy Levels.No classification; the standard is used to verify the precision value stated by the manufacturer for any instrument.ISO 17123-2:2001
Permissible Error of Compensator (Automatic Levels)Specifies limits, e.g., ± 0.5 arc-seconds for Precision Levels.Not specified as a separate parameter; its effect is inherently included in the overall system precision test.ISO 17123-2:2001
Telescope MagnificationSpecified by class (e.g., 28x to 40x for Precision Levels).Not specified. It is a manufacturer-defined characteristic, not a performance parameter tested by the standard.ISO 17123-2:2001
Sensitivity of Level Vial (Tilting Levels)Specified in seconds per 2 mm run (e.g., 10" to 20" for Precision Levels).Not specified or tested; considered a design characteristic of the instrument.ISO 17123-2:2001
Collimation Error TestPrescribes the 'Two-Peg Test' as a procedural check.Provides a statistically-based 'Full test procedure' to calculate the line-of-sight (collimation) error 'zeta'.ISO 17123-2:2001
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values3

Quick Reference Values
min concrete gradeM20
frequency separation±20% from operating frequency
foundation mass ratio2.5 to 3.0 times machine mass
Key Formulas
fn = (1/2π) √(k/m) — Natural frequency of the foundation system

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Permissible Amplitudes of Vibration
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Design Criteria
Clause 5 - Dynamic Analysis
Clause 6 - Structural Detailing

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of S...
→
IS 1904:1986Code of practice for design and construction ...
→

Frequently Asked Questions3

What is the minimum grade of concrete required for machine foundations?+
M20 is the minimum permissible, though M25 or higher is highly recommended for handling heavy dynamic loads.
How much clearance is required to avoid resonance?+
The foundation's natural frequency should be at least 20% higher or lower than the machine's operating frequency.
Should machine foundations be isolated from the rest of the structure?+
Yes, machine foundations should be separated from adjacent building foundations and floor slabs by isolation joints to prevent vibration transmission.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →