InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 1624 : 1986Method of field testing of building lime

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
ASTM C110 · EN 459-2 · ASTM C25
CurrentRareTesting MethodMaterials Science · Building Limes and Gypsum Products
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues4InternationalTablesFAQ3Related

IS 1624:1986 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for method of field testing of building lime. This standard provides simple, rapid field testing methods to assess the general quality and suitability of building lime on construction sites without the need for a full laboratory setup. It covers visual inspection, impurity checks, workability (ball test), and basic soundness.

Method of field testing of building lime

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Rare
Domain
Materials Science — Building Limes and Gypsum Products
Type
Testing Method
International equivalents
ASTM C110-23 · ASTM International, USAEN 459-2:2021 · CEN (European Committee for Standardization), EuropeASTM C25-22 · ASTM International, USA
Typically used with
IS 712IS 6932IS 460
Also on InfraLens for IS 1624
4Key values3FAQs
Practical Notes
! Field tests are indicative only and should not replace formal laboratory testing (IS 6932) for critical structural or conservation applications.
! During visual examination, look for lumps, unburnt limestone pieces, and consistency in color which indicate poor calcination.
! Ensure quicklime is thoroughly and safely slaked before attempting any workability or soundness field tests.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 4Visual ExaminationCl. 5Test for ImpuritiesCl. 6Workability Test (Ball Test)Cl. 7Soundness Test
Pulled from IS 1624:1986. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
building limequicklimehydrated limelime putty

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
ASTM C110-23ASTM International, USA
MediumCurrent
Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Quicklime, Hydrated Lime, and Limestone
Provides precise laboratory methods for physical properties that IS 1624 assesses qualitatively in the field.
EN 459-2:2021CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Europe
MediumCurrent
Building lime - Part 2: Test methods
Defines reference laboratory test methods for building lime properties, contrasting with the simplified field tests of IS 1624.
ASTM C25-22ASTM International, USA
LowCurrent
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Limestone, Quicklime, and Hydrated Lime
Focuses on quantitative chemical analysis, whereas IS 1624 uses a simple acid test for a qualitative check of carbonates.
BS 6463-102:1996BSI (British Standards Institution), UK
LowWithdrawn
Quicklime, hydrated lime and natural calcium carbonate. Methods of test. Chemical analysis
Provided detailed laboratory chemical analysis methods, now harmonized under the European standard EN 459-2.
Key Differences
≠IS 1624 specifies qualitative, observational field tests (e.g., visual inspection, feel), while standards like ASTM C110 and EN 459-2 mandate quantitative, instrument-based laboratory tests.
≠The soundness test in IS 1624 is a simple pat boiled in water, whereas ASTM C110 uses an autoclave expansion test under high pressure and temperature, providing a much more severe and measurable assessment.
≠IS 1624 is intended for rapid, on-site assessment with minimal equipment, whereas international standards are designed for product certification and require a controlled laboratory environment with specialized apparatus.
≠The assessment of unburnt material in IS 1624 is a simple effervescence test with acid, while ASTM C25 and EN 459-2 require complex chemical analysis to determine the exact percentage of carbon dioxide.
Key Similarities
≈Both the Indian and international standards recognize the critical importance of testing for soundness to prevent delayed expansion, cracking, and failure in plaster or mortar.
≈All standards include methods to assess the presence of impurities or unreacted materials, such as unburnt calcium carbonate, which affects the quality and performance of the lime.
≈The concept of workability or plasticity is common to all standards, acknowledging its importance for application, although the method of assessment differs from subjective (IS) to quantitative (ASTM).
≈Both IS 1624 and international standards for hydraulic limes include a test to confirm the material's ability to set and harden under water, which is the defining characteristic of hydraulic lime.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Soundness Test MethodA pat of lime putty is observed for cracks after 24 hours in air and 3 hours in boiling water.A test bar is subjected to steam at 2.03 MPa in an autoclave for 3 hours; maximum expansion is measured.ASTM C110
Test for CarbonatesQualitative: Observation of effervescence upon adding dilute hydrochloric acid.Quantitative: Determination of CO2 percentage by chemical analysis or instrumentation.ASTM C25
Workability / PlasticitySubjective assessment by 'feel' with a trowel. Putty should be smooth and plastic.Quantitative measurement of a 'Plasticity Figure' using an Emley Plasticimeter (min. 200 for plastic limes).ASTM C110
Setting Time (Hydraulic Lime)Qualitative: A pat is placed under water for a month to check for hardening.Quantitative: Time of setting is determined using the Vicat needle apparatus (e.g., initial set >2h).EN 459-2
Test EnvironmentField / On-siteControlled LaboratoryASTM C110 / EN 459-2
Fineness / ResidueNot a specified field test, but assessed through visual inspection for lumps.Measured as percentage residue on specific sieves (e.g., max 0.5% on 600-µm sieve for hydrated lime).ASTM C110
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values4

Quick Reference Values
Sieve size for field impurity test850 micron
Ball size for workability test50 mm diameter
Drying time for soundness pat24 hours minimum
Minimum sample size for visual inspection5 kg

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Visual Examination
Clause 5 - Test for Impurities
Clause 6 - Workability Test (Ball Test)
Clause 7 - Soundness Test

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 712:1984Building Limes - Specification
→
IS 6932:1973Code of Practice for Earthwork - Part 2: Fill...
→
IS 460:2000Test Sieves: Part-I Wire Cloth Test Sieves
→

Frequently Asked Questions3

What is the purpose of the ball test in IS 1624?+
It provides a quick field indication of the workability and plasticity of the lime putty by observing how a 50mm ball of lime yields under impact.
Can field tests substitute laboratory tests for building lime?+
No, field tests are preliminary for quick site acceptance; formal quality verification should be done in a lab as per IS 6932.
How are impurities assessed on-site?+
By washing a prepared lime paste through an 850-micron IS sieve and visually examining the retained residue for unburnt materials or inert matter.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →