InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 12051 : 1986Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Retaining Walls (General)

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 1997-1 · BS 8002 · AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition
CurrentFrequently UsedCode of PracticeBIMGeotechnical · Tanks, Silos and Storage Structures
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues5InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 12051:1986 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for design and construction of retaining walls (general). This code of practice outlines the general requirements for the design and construction of retaining walls. It covers aspects like site investigation, materials, calculation of earth pressures, stability checks, drainage measures, and construction supervision.

Covers general principles and guidelines for the design and construction of various types of retaining walls.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Frequently Used
Domain
Geotechnical — Tanks, Silos and Storage Structures
Type
Code of Practice
International equivalents
EN 1997-1:2004 · European Committee for Standardization (CEN), European UnionBS 8002:2015 · British Standards Institution (BSI), United KingdomAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition · American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), USAAS 4678-2002 · Standards Australia, Australia
Typically used with
IS 456IS 2720IS 1893IS 1904
Also on InfraLens for IS 12051
5Key values4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! Provision of effective drainage (weep holes, granular backfill, longitudinal drain) is the most critical aspect for the safety and longevity of a retaining wall, as it prevents buildup of hydrostatic pressure.
! This is a general code; for specific applications like bridge abutments or waterfront structures, other specialized codes (e.g., from IRC or other relevant bodies) must be used in conjunction.
! Always consider potential surcharge loads from adjacent traffic, structures, sloped backfill, or temporary construction activities when calculating earth pressures.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 5MaterialsCl. 6Design Considerations (Earth Pressures, Surcharge)Cl. 7Stability Requirements (Sliding, Overturning, Bearing Capacity)Cl. 8DrainageCl. 9Construction and Supervision
Pulled from IS 12051:1986. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
concretemasonrysoilreinforced concrete

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 1997-1:2004European Committee for Standardization (CEN), European Union
HighCurrent
Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules
Covers the fundamental geotechnical design principles for retaining structures using a Limit State Design approach.
BS 8002:2015British Standards Institution (BSI), United Kingdom
HighCurrent
Code of practice for design of retaining walls
Provides UK-specific guidance on the analysis and design of earth retaining structures, aligned with Eurocode principles.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th EditionAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), USA
MediumCurrent
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
Provides comprehensive LRFD-based design guidelines for highway retaining walls (Sections 3, 10, and 11).
AS 4678-2002Standards Australia, Australia
HighCurrent
Earth-retaining structures
Specifies requirements for the design and construction of various earth-retaining structures using a limit states format.
Key Differences
≠IS 12051 uses a Working Stress Method (WSM) with a single, global factor of safety, whereas modern standards like Eurocode 7 and AASHTO LRFD use a Limit State Design (LSD) / Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) philosophy with partial safety factors on actions (loads), materials, and resistances.
≠Seismic design guidance in IS 12051 is based on the pseudo-static Mononobe-Okabe method with limited detail. Modern codes (e.g., Eurocode 8, AASHTO) provide much more comprehensive methodologies, including displacement-based analysis and specific detailing requirements for different seismic performance levels.
≠Eurocode 7 offers multiple 'Design Approaches' (DA1, DA2, DA3) which apply partial factors at different points in the calculation (e.g., on actions, on material properties, or on resistances), offering flexibility. IS 12051 has a single, prescribed calculation method.
≠IS 12051 is a standalone, general document. International standards are often part of a suite, requiring interaction between different codes (e.g., Eurocode 7 for geotechnical, Eurocode 2 for concrete design), leading to more integrated but complex design processes.
Key Similarities
≈All standards, regardless of design philosophy, require checking of the same fundamental stability failure modes: overturning about the toe, sliding at the base, and bearing capacity failure of the underlying soil.
≈The calculation of active and passive earth pressures is universally based on classical theories developed by Coulomb and Rankine, which form the theoretical foundation in all the compared standards.
≈All codes place critical emphasis on the provision of adequate drainage systems (e.g., weep holes, granular backfill, drainage blankets) behind the wall to relieve hydrostatic pressure, recognizing it as a primary cause of failures.
≈All standards require the designer to account for surcharge loads (e.g., from traffic, adjacent structures, or sloped backfill) and incorporate their effects into the earth pressure and stability calculations.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Design PhilosophyWorking Stress Method (WSM)Limit State Design (LSD) / Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)EN 1997-1 / AASHTO LRFD
Factor of Safety (Sliding)≥ 1.5 (static, dead + live load)Achieved via partial factors. E.g., for GEO limit state, design resisting force ≥ design sliding force, where forces are factored.EN 1997-1
Factor of Safety (Overturning)≥ 1.5 (static, dead + live load)Checked by ensuring design resisting moments ≥ design overturning moments. Explicit FOS is not used.EN 1997-1
Factor of Safety (Bearing Capacity)≥ 2.5 (static loads)Partial resistance factor γ_R;v = 1.4 applied to characteristic bearing resistance (in Design Approach 1, Combination 2).EN 1997-1
Minimum Weep Hole DiameterNot less than 100 mmNo strict minimum, but good practice suggests 75 mm to 100 mm.BS 8002:2015
Wall Friction Angle (δ) for concrete cast against soilSuggests 2/3 ϕ to ϕSuggests δ can be taken as 2/3 ϕ' for precast concrete and tan⁻¹(0.5) for smooth surfaces.EN 1997-1, Annex C
Minimum Cover to Reinforcement50 mm for surfaces exposed to soil or weatherVaries by exposure class. For XC3/XC4 (moderate humidity/cyclic wet-dry), typically 35-40 mm plus an allowance (Δc_dev) of 10 mm.EN 1992-1-1 (Eurocode 2)
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values5

Quick Reference Values
Minimum Factor of Safety against Sliding1.5
Minimum Factor of Safety against Overturning1.5
Minimum depth of foundation below ground level900 mm
Allowable tension in concrete for overturning check0 N/mm2
Minimum weep hole diameter75 mm
Key Formulas
Pa = 0.5 * Ka * γ * H^2 — Rankine's active earth pressure
Pp = 0.5 * Kp * γ * H^2 — Rankine's passive earth pressure
Ka = (1 - sin(φ)) / (1 + sin(φ)) — Coefficient of active earth pressure for level backfill

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 5 - Materials
Clause 6 - Design Considerations (Earth Pressures, Surcharge)
Clause 7 - Stability Requirements (Sliding, Overturning, Bearing Capacity)
Clause 8 - Drainage
Clause 9 - Construction and Supervision

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 2720:1973Methods of test for soils - Determination of ...
→
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of S...
→
IS 1904:1986Code of practice for design and construction ...
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the minimum factor of safety against sliding for a retaining wall?+
A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against sliding shall be ensured (Clause 7.2.1).
What is the minimum factor of safety against overturning?+
A minimum factor of safety of 1.5 against overturning about the toe shall be provided (Clause 7.3.1).
Are weep holes necessary?+
Yes, adequate drainage must be provided. This can be done through weep holes of at least 75 mm diameter, spaced not more than 2m apart, both horizontally and vertically (Clause 8.2).
What types of soil investigation are recommended?+
The code recommends determining the soil profile, physical properties of the soil, location of the ground water table, and bearing capacity through methods outlined in IS 1892 and IS 2720 (Clause 4).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →