InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 6341 : 1971Method of laboratory test for the efficacy of wood preservatives against soft rot

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
EN 807 · AWPA E14 · JIS K 1571
CurrentSpecializedTesting MethodMaterials Science · Timber and Timber Stores
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues4InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 6341:1971 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for method of laboratory test for the efficacy of wood preservatives against soft rot. This standard specifies a laboratory method for testing the efficacy of wood preservatives against soft rot fungi. It details the preparation of soil, test specimens, fungal cultures, and the procedure for exposing treated wood blocks to determine their resistance to decay by measuring mass loss.

Method of laboratory test for the efficacy of wood preservatives against soft rot

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Materials Science — Timber and Timber Stores
Type
Testing Method
International equivalents
EN 807:2013 · CEN (European Committee for Standardization), EuropeAWPA E14-19 · AWPA (American Wood Protection Association), USAJIS K 1571:2010 · JSA (Japanese Standards Association), Japan
Typically used with
IS 401
Also on InfraLens for IS 6341
4Key values4FAQs
Practical Notes
! This is a soil-block test method, which simulates the conditions of wood in contact with damp soil, a primary environment for soft rot.
! The test's validity depends heavily on maintaining sterile conditions to prevent contamination from other microorganisms.
! Results are comparative, evaluating the performance of treated wood against untreated control specimens to establish a 'toxic limit' for the preservative.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 3ApparatusCl. 5Test FungusCl. 6Preparation of Test SpecimensCl. 8Test ProcedureCl. 9Evaluation of Results
Pulled from IS 6341:1971. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
woodtimberwood preservatives

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
EN 807:2013CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Europe
HighCurrent
Wood preservatives - Determination of the effectiveness against soft rotting micro-fungi and other soil inhabiting micro-organisms
Specifies a laboratory method for determining the protective efficacy of wood preservatives against soft rot fungi using unsterile soil.
AWPA E14-19AWPA (American Wood Protection Association), USA
HighCurrent
Standard Method for Evaluating Wood Preservatives in an Unsterile Soil Test
Describes a laboratory test to determine the relative effectiveness of preservatives in wood exposed to unsterile soil, a key environment for soft rot.
BS 7066-2:1989BSI (British Standards Institution), UK
HighWithdrawn
Wood preservatives. Determination of the toxic values against soft rot fungi
A direct predecessor to European standards, it detailed a method for finding toxic limits of preservatives against soft rot.
JIS K 1571:2010JSA (Japanese Standards Association), Japan
MediumCurrent
Test methods for performance of wood preservatives
A comprehensive standard that includes a soil bed test (Test 4) for evaluating preservative performance against decay, including soft rot.
Key Differences
≠IS 6341 specifies the use of a pure culture of Chaetomium globosum, whereas modern standards like EN 807 and AWPA E14 primarily use unsterile soil, relying on its natural microflora to provide a more realistic but less controlled test environment.
≠The primary assessment criterion in IS 6341 is mass loss. EN 807 requires both mass loss and, for hardwoods, measurement of bending strength loss, which is considered a more sensitive indicator of soft rot decay.
≠Test specimen dimensions vary significantly. IS 6341 uses 40x10x5 mm blocks, EN 807 uses 50x25x15 mm blocks, and AWPA E14 uses 19x19x19 mm cubes. This affects the surface area to volume ratio, influencing decay rates.
≠IS 6341 is less prescriptive about the test's validity criteria, stating decay must be 'sufficient'. In contrast, EN 807 requires a minimum average mass loss of 20% in untreated control blocks for the test to be valid.
Key Similarities
≈All standards are based on the fundamental principle of exposing preservative-treated wood specimens to a soft-rot-conducive environment to determine preservative efficacy.
≈The use of mass loss as a quantitative measure of decay is a common feature across all the compared standards, forming a basis for calculating preservative effectiveness.
≈All methodologies mandate the inclusion of untreated and/or solvent-treated control specimens to validate the test conditions and provide a baseline for decay against which treated samples are compared.
≈The incubation conditions are broadly similar, requiring controlled high humidity (over 90%) and elevated temperatures (typically 25-30°C) to accelerate microbial activity.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Primary Test Organism(s)Pure culture of Chaetomium globosum (ATCC 6205) or soil burial.Natural microflora in unsterile horticultural soil.EN 807:2013
Primary Assessment MethodMass loss percentage.Mass loss percentage and visual rating (0-10 scale).AWPA E14-19
Test Block Size40 x 10 x 5 mm50 x 25 x 15 mmEN 807:2013
Incubation Temperature27 ± 1 °C27 ± 2 °CAWPA E14-19
Incubation Period8 to 16 weeks12 weeks (can be adjusted based on decay rate in controls)EN 807:2013
Test Validity (Control Mass Loss)Not explicitly quantified; decay must be 'sufficient'.Mean mass loss in untreated controls must be at least 20%.EN 807:2013
Recommended Softwood SpeciesPinus roxburghii (Chir)Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)EN 807:2013
Strength Loss AssessmentNot required.Required for hardwoods (bending strength); optional for softwoods.EN 807:2013
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values4

Quick Reference Values
Test specimen size20 x 20 x 5 mm
Incubation temperature22 ± 1 °C
Incubation period12 weeks
Soil moisture content110 to 130 percent of the water-holding capacity
Key Formulas
Mass Loss (%) = ((W1 - W2) / W1) * 100 — Where W1 is initial dry weight and W2 is final dry weight after test

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 3 - Apparatus
Clause 5 - Test Fungus
Clause 6 - Preparation of Test Specimens
Clause 8 - Test Procedure
Clause 9 - Evaluation of Results

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 401:2001Code of Practice for Preservation of Timber
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What type of decay does this test evaluate?+
It specifically evaluates resistance to 'soft rot', a type of fungal decay common in very wet conditions, as distinct from brown or white rot.
How is the preservative's effectiveness determined?+
By measuring the percentage mass loss of the treated wood specimen after a 12-week incubation period with a soft rot fungus. Lower mass loss indicates higher efficacy.
What is the primary fungus used in this test?+
The standard recommends using a culture of a suitable soft rot fungus, with *Chaetomium globosum* being a commonly used species for this purpose (Clause 5).
What are the test specimens called?+
They are referred to as 'test blocks' or 'test specimens', typically small blocks of a specified wood species.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →