InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 15024 : 2001Guidelines for Design of Reinforced Soil Structures (General)

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
BS 8006-1 · AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition (2020) · NF P 94-270
CurrentSpecializedGuidelinesBIMGeotechnical · Geosynthetics and Ground Improvement
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues6InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 15024:2001 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for guidelines for design of reinforced soil structures (general). This standard provides guidelines for the design and analysis of reinforced soil structures, such as retaining walls and embankments. It outlines the principles for ensuring both external stability (sliding, overturning, bearing capacity) and internal stability (reinforcement rupture, pullout).

Provides general guidelines for the design of reinforced soil structures.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Geotechnical — Geosynthetics and Ground Improvement
Type
Guidelines
International equivalents
BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016 · BSI (British Standards Institution), United KingdomAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition (2020) · AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), USANF P 94-270:2020 · AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation), FranceFHWA-NHI-10-024 · FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), USA
Typically used with
IS 2720IS 1893
Also on InfraLens for IS 15024
6Key values4Tables4FAQs

BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.

Practical Notes
! Drainage is critical for the long-term performance of reinforced soil walls; proper drainage systems behind and at the base of the wall must be included as per Clause 10.
! The selection of backfill material is as important as the reinforcement. It must be granular and free-draining to prevent pore pressure buildup and ensure predictable soil-reinforcement interaction.
! The interaction coefficient (Ci or F*) between soil and reinforcement is a key design parameter. If not reliably provided by the manufacturer, it should be determined from project-specific laboratory tests like pullout tests.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 5MaterialsCl. 6Design PrinciplesCl. 7External Stability AnalysisCl. 8Internal Stability AnalysisCl. 10Drainage Considerations
Pulled from IS 15024:2001. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
reinforced soilgeosyntheticsgeogridgeotextilefill materialsoil

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
BS 8006-1:2010+A1:2016BSI (British Standards Institution), United Kingdom
HighCurrent
Code of practice for strengthened/reinforced soils and other fills
Covers design, construction, and maintenance of reinforced soil walls and slopes using a limit state design approach.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th Edition (2020)AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), USA
HighCurrent
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Section 11: Walls, Abutments, and Piers)
Provides comprehensive design guidance for MSE walls using a Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) methodology.
NF P 94-270:2020AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation), France
HighCurrent
Geotechnical design - Part 1: Retaining structures - Reinforced and soil nailing structures
A detailed standard for reinforced soil structures, aligned with Eurocode 7 principles.
FHWA-NHI-10-024FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), USA
HighCurrent
Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes
A widely used, comprehensive design manual that follows the AASHTO LRFD approach, providing detailed examples and procedures.
Key Differences
≠IS 15024 uses a limit state approach with global factors of safety (e.g., FoS ≥ 1.5 for sliding), whereas AASHTO LRFD uses separate load factors (γ) and resistance factors (φ), which is a more refined probabilistic approach.
≠International standards like BS 8006 and FHWA manuals provide highly detailed methodologies for assessing long-term strength loss of reinforcement due to durability (corrosion for steel, degradation for geosynthetics), often requiring calculation of sacrificial thickness or specific reduction factors based on soil chemistry and design life. IS 15024 provides more general qualitative guidance.
≠Seismic design in IS 15024 is based on a pseudo-static method derived from IS 1893. AASHTO LRFD provides more detailed pseudo-static procedures, including specific guidelines for the distribution of seismic earth pressure and inertial forces of the wall itself.
≠AASHTO and FHWA standards place significant emphasis on the design and testing of the connection strength between the reinforcement and the wall facing, applying a specific resistance factor. IS 15024 addresses this as part of the overall tensile capacity check but with less specific focus.
Key Similarities
≈All standards mandate checking for the same fundamental external stability failure modes: sliding at the base, overturning about the toe, and bearing capacity failure of the foundation soil.
≈The principle of internal stability analysis is consistent across all codes, requiring checks for reinforcement tensile rupture and pullout (bond) failure at multiple levels within the reinforced soil mass.
≈All standards generally utilize classical earth pressure theories, such as Rankine or Coulomb, for calculating the lateral forces used in external stability analysis, with some modifications for wall friction.
≈The general requirement for minimum reinforcement length is similar, typically specified as a proportion of the wall height (e.g., 0.7H) to ensure the internal failure surface is contained within the reinforced block.
≈All codes provide methodologies to account for the effects of various surcharge loads (uniform, line, strip, etc.) applied on or behind the reinforced soil structure.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Minimum Reinforcement Length (L/H)L ≥ 0.7H, with a minimum of 3.0 m.L ≥ 0.7H, with a minimum of 2.4 m (8 ft).AASHTO LRFD
Factor of Safety against Sliding≥ 1.5AASHTO uses a resistance factor φ=1.0 for sliding against factored loads. Traditional ASD (Allowable Stress Design) codes also use ≥ 1.5.AASHTO LRFD / General ASD Practice
Base Eccentricity Limit (e/B) for Bearinge/B ≤ 1/6 (resultant within middle third) for soil.e/B ≤ 1/4 for soil; e/B ≤ 3/8 for rock.AASHTO LRFD
Factor of Safety for Pullout Resistance≥ 1.5Uses a resistance factor (φ) based on reinforcement type (e.g., φ = 0.9 for steel strips, φ = 0.8 for geogrids).AASHTO LRFD
Factor of Safety for Tensile Rupture≥ 1.5Uses a resistance factor (φ) based on reinforcement type (e.g., φ = 0.75 for steel strips, φ = 0.9 for geogrids).AASHTO LRFD
Minimum Embedment DepthH/20 to H/10, with a minimum of 0.6 m.H/20 for level ground, with a minimum of 0.6 m (2 ft).FHWA-NHI-10-024
Seismic Coefficient (kh) for Pseudo-static Analysiskh = (Z/2) * (I/R) based on IS 1893 seismic zones.kh = 0.5 * Amax, where Amax is site-adjusted peak ground acceleration. Simplified: kh = 0.5 * PGA.AASHTO LRFD
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values6

Quick Reference Values
Min. Factor of Safety against Sliding (Static)1.5
Min. Factor of Safety against Overturning (Static)2.0
Min. Factor of Safety against Bearing Capacity (Static)2.5
Min. Factor of Safety against Reinforcement Rupture1.5
Min. Factor of Safety against Reinforcement Pullout1.5
Max. allowable percentage of fines in backfill< 15% passing 75 micron sieve
Key Formulas
Ti = Ka * σv * Sv — Maximum tension per unit width of wall in a reinforcement layer
Le = (Ti * FS_p) / (2 * σv * C_i * tan(φ'_fill)) — Required effective pullout length behind failure plane

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Minimum Factors of Safety for External Stability
Table 2 - Minimum Factors of Safety for Internal Stability
Table 3 - Typical Values of Coefficient of Interaction for Pull-out
Table 4 - Recommended Fill Material Properties
Key Clauses
Clause 5 - Materials
Clause 6 - Design Principles
Clause 7 - External Stability Analysis
Clause 8 - Internal Stability Analysis
Clause 10 - Drainage Considerations

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 2720:1973Methods of test for soils - Determination of ...
→
IS 1893:2016Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of S...
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the minimum factor of safety against sliding for a reinforced soil wall?+
The minimum factor of safety is 1.5 for static conditions and 1.1 for seismic conditions, as per Table 1.
What are the two primary stability analyses required for design?+
The design must check for External Stability (treating the reinforced zone as a rigid block) and Internal Stability (checking against reinforcement rupture and pullout), as per Clause 6.
What type of soil is recommended for the reinforced backfill?+
A well-graded granular, free-draining soil (sand or gravel) is recommended. The percentage of fines (passing 75-micron sieve) should generally be less than 15% (Clause 5.2.2 & Table 4).
How is the tension in a reinforcement layer calculated?+
The tension (Ti) is calculated based on the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka), the vertical stress at that depth (σv), and the vertical spacing of the reinforcement (Sv) (Clause 8.3).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →