InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 13946 (Part 4) : 2000Determination of rock stress-Code of practice, Part 4: Using flat jack technique

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
ASTM D4645 · ISRM-SM
CurrentSpecializedCode of PracticeGeotechnical · Rock Mechanics
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues4InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 13946:2000 (Part 4) is the Indian Standard (BIS) for determination of rock stress-code of practice, part 4: using flat jack technique. This standard details the procedure for determining the in-situ stress in rock near an exposed surface using the flat jack technique. It outlines the equipment, method for cutting a slot, installing the jack, applying pressure to cancel deformation, and calculating the stress component perpendicular to the jack.

Determination of rock stress-Code of practice, Part 4: Using flat jack technique

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Geotechnical — Rock Mechanics
Type
Code of Practice
International equivalents
ASTM D4645-18 · ASTM International, USAISRM-SM-2003-Part 3 · International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM)
Typically used with
IS 9143
Also on InfraLens for IS 13946
4Key values4FAQs
Practical Notes
! Accuracy is highly dependent on the quality of the slot cutting and ensuring the jack is properly seated without voids.
! This method measures stress near a free surface (e.g., tunnel wall), which can be influenced by excavation-induced stress redistribution.
! To determine the complete stress tensor at a point, tests must be conducted in a minimum of three, and preferably more, non-parallel slots.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 4EquipmentCl. 5ProcedureCl. 5.4Installation of Flat JackCl. 5.5Pressurization of the Flat JackCl. 6Calculation and Interpretation of ResultsCl. 7Reporting of Results
Pulled from IS 13946:2000. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
rock mass

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
ASTM D4645-18ASTM International, USA
HighCurrent
Standard Test Method for Determination of the In-Situ Stress in Rock Using the Hydraulic Fracturing Method
Both standards provide a detailed procedure for determining in-situ rock stress using hydraulic fracturing in a borehole.
ISRM-SM-2003-Part 3International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM)
HighCurrent
ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation—Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF)
Provides a comprehensive methodology for hydraulic fracturing, forming the theoretical basis for many national standards including IS 13946.
Key Differences
≠IS 13946 specifies a prescriptive pumping rate of '10 to 20 litres/min', which is unusually high for typical test setups. In contrast, ASTM D4645 uses a performance-based criterion, specifying a rate sufficient to cause breakdown in 30 to 60 seconds.
≠The ISRM Suggested Method explicitly includes procedures for Hydraulic Testing of Pre-existing Fractures (HTPF) to determine the stress state, a technique not covered in IS 13946.
≠ASTM D4645 and the ISRM method provide more detailed guidance and criteria for selecting suitable, intact, and homogeneous rock sections for testing, whereas the guidance in IS 13946 is more general.
≠International standards like ASTM D4645 provide more detailed descriptions of graphical techniques for interpreting the pressure-time curve to accurately determine the shut-in pressure (Ps), a critical parameter for stress calculation.
Key Similarities
≈All standards are based on the same fundamental principle established by Hubbert and Willis, using breakdown, shut-in, and re-opening pressures to calculate the magnitude of principal stresses.
≈The basic field equipment, including the use of a straddle packer system to isolate the test interval, a high-pressure pump, and pressure transducers, is functionally identical across the standards.
≈All standards require the use of an impression packer or similar downhole tool (like a borehole televiewer) after the test to determine the orientation of the induced fracture.
≈The general test sequence is consistent: sealing the test interval, a primary pressurization cycle to induce breakdown, and subsequent pressurization cycles to determine the fracture re-opening pressure.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Test Interval Length to Diameter Ratio (L/D)Approx. 5 to 10 (based on 30-50 cm length in AX/BX boreholes)4 to 10ASTM D4645-18
Pumping Rate for BreakdownPrescriptive: '10 to 20 litres/min'Performance-based: Rate sufficient to cause breakdown in 30 to 60 secondsASTM D4645-18
Number of Post-Breakdown CyclesAt least two cyclesSeveral cycles are normally run (typically 3 to 5)ASTM D4645-18
Impression Packer Setting Pressure7 to 10 MPaSlightly above the previously measured shut-in pressure (Ps)ASTM D4645-18
Impression Packer Setting Time10 to 15 minutes5 to 10 minutesASTM D4645-18
Assumed Fracture OrientationAssumes induced tensile fracture is vertical and parallel to the maximum horizontal stress.Assumes induced fracture is perpendicular to the least principal stress.ISRM-SM-2003-Part 3
Pore Pressure Assumption in CalculationThe standard calculation formula explicitly includes the pore pressure (Po) term.The calculation formula also explicitly includes the pore pressure (Po) term, emphasizing its direct measurement if possible.ASTM D4645-18
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values4

Quick Reference Values
Typical slot width5 to 6 mm
Recommended distance between measurement pinsAbout twice the jack width
Number of pressure cyclesAt least two cycles of loading and unloading (Clause 5.5.1)
Maximum test pressureShould not exceed one-third of the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock (Clause 5.5.1)
Key Formulas
σ_n = P_c * K_m * K_a — Stress normal to jack, where Pc is cancellation pressure, Km is jack constant, Ka is partial slot factor.

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Equipment
Clause 5 - Procedure
Clause 5.4 - Installation of Flat Jack
Clause 5.5 - Pressurization of the Flat Jack
Clause 6 - Calculation and Interpretation of Results
Clause 7 - Reporting of Results

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 9143:1979Method for the determination of unconfined co...
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the primary output of a flat jack test?+
The test determines the magnitude of the in-situ compressive stress acting perpendicular to the plane of the jack at the measurement location.
What is 'cancellation pressure'?+
It is the hydraulic pressure applied to the flat jack that is required to restore the rock mass around the slot to its original state of strain before the slot was cut.
Why is this method considered a 'stress relief' technique?+
Because the first step involves cutting a slot, which relieves the stress in the rock immediately surrounding it. The test then measures the pressure needed to reverse this relief.
Can this test measure tensile stress?+
No, the standard flat jack technique is designed to measure compressive stress. If the pins move apart after slot cutting, it indicates a tensile or very low stress field, but the method cannot quantify it.

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →