Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
IS 13362:1992 Part 3 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for methods of test for doors and window assemblies - part 3: water tightness. This standard specifies the laboratory test method for determining the structural performance of door and window assemblies when subjected to static wind pressure. It details the required apparatus, test specimen mounting, procedure for applying incremental positive and negative pressures, and the parameters to be recorded in the test report.
Specifies a method for determining the water tightness of doors and window assemblies under static pressure.
BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.
Practical Notes
! The maximum test pressure for a project is derived from the design wind pressure calculated as per IS 875 (Part 3), considering building location, height, and topography.
! This part (Part 4) only covers resistance to static pressure. Other performance aspects like air leakage and water penetration are covered in other parts of the IS 13362 series.
! Careful sealing of the test specimen in the chamber is critical to avoid leakage and ensure accurate pressure application on the assembly's face.
EN 12046-1:2003CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Europe
HighCurrent
Windows and pedestrian doors - Operating forces - Test method - Part 1: Windows
Directly corresponds to the IS code's scope for testing window operating forces.
EN 12046-2:2000CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Europe
HighCurrent
Windows and pedestrian doors - Operating forces - Test method - Part 2: Doors
Directly corresponds to the IS code's scope for testing door operating forces.
ASTM E2068-00(2022)ASTM International, USA
MediumCurrent
Standard Test Method for Determination of Operating Force of Sliding Windows and Doors
Covers the same test principle but is limited to horizontally and vertically sliding units.
EN 12217:2015CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Europe
MediumCurrent
Doors - Operating forces - Requirements and classification
Provides performance requirements and classes based on test results from methods like EN 12046-2.
Key Differences
≠IS 13362-1 is a unified method for both doors and windows, whereas European standards are split into EN 12046-1 (Windows) and EN 12046-2 (Doors).
≠The IS code is purely a test method and does not provide performance classes or acceptance criteria. In contrast, standards like EN 12217 provide a detailed classification system (e.g., Class 1 to 4) based on measured forces.
≠International standards like EN 12046 specify the use of a 'force gauge with an accuracy of ±2% of the measured value', which is more precise than the 'spring balance or equivalent' suggested in the IS code.
≠The ASTM E2068 standard is specifically for sliding windows and doors, while IS 13362-1 covers all types of operation (sliding, swinging, etc.) under one general procedure.
Key Similarities
≈All standards are based on the same fundamental principle of applying force at the normal operating point (e.g., handle) and measuring the force required.
≈Both IS and international counterparts specify measuring the forces to initiate motion, sustain motion, and operate locking/latching mechanisms.
≈The general test setup, requiring the specimen to be installed as it would be in use and the force applied in the direction of operation, is consistent across all standards.
≈All standards use Newtons (N) as the primary unit for force measurement, ensuring a common basis for comparison.
Parameter Comparison
Parameter
IS Value
International
Source
Force Measurement Device
Spring balance or equivalent
Force gauge with an accuracy of ±2% of the measured value
EN 12046-1/2
Performance Classification
Not specified in the standard
Specifies performance classes (e.g., Class 1-4 for doors) based on force values
EN 12217
Scope Structure
Single document for doors and windows
Separate parts for windows (Part 1) and doors (Part 2)
EN 12046
Example Force Limit (Sliding Window Initiation)
Test method only; no limit specified
≤ 90 N for Performance Class R (as per AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 referenced by ASTM)
ASTM E2068
Example Force Limit (Door Operation)
Test method only; no limit specified
≤ 100 N for a Class 2 door
EN 12217
Test Specimen Conditioning
Tested 'as received'
Tested as installed for use, no specific pre-conditioning cycles defined in the test method itself
EN 12046-1/2
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use
Key Values4
Quick Reference Values
Test pressure applicationApplied in increments not exceeding 20% of the maximum test pressure
Pressure holding time per incrementat least 10 seconds
Pressure measuring device accuracywithin ±2% of the maximum reading
Pressure application directionBoth positive (inward) and negative (outward) pressures are applied
Tables & Referenced Sections
Key Tables
No tables data
Key Clauses
Clause 4 - Principle
Clause 5 - Apparatus
Clause 7 - Test Procedure
Clause 8 - Test Report
Frequently Asked Questions4
What is the purpose of this test?+
To determine the structural performance and deflection of a door or window assembly under a specified static wind pressure (Clause 4).
Does this standard specify the passing criteria for wind pressure?+
No, it is a 'method of test'. The passing criteria (maximum allowable deflection or damage) are typically specified by the specifier or relevant building regulations, based on the performance required.
How are positive and negative pressures tested?+
The test is conducted by first applying positive pressure (pushing inwards), releasing it, and then applying negative pressure (pulling outwards) on the assembly (Clause 7.2).
Is air leakage measured in this test?+
No. This test is for wind resistance only. Air leakage testing is covered in IS 13362 (Part 2).