InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 11551 : 1986Criteria for Design of Canal Structures: Flumes

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
Design of Small Canal Structures · ISO 9826 · ISO 4359
CurrentSpecializedCode of PracticeWater Resources · Irrigation and Canal Structures
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues6InternationalTablesFAQ4Related

IS 11551:1986 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for criteria for design of canal structures: flumes. This standard provides criteria for the hydraulic design of flumes, which are constricted channel sections in canal systems. It covers the design principles for flumes operating under both sub-critical and super-critical flow conditions, with a major focus on the geometry and energy loss calculations for inlet and outlet transitions.

Provides criteria for the hydraulic and structural design of flumes in canals for flow measurement or crossing obstructions.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Water Resources — Irrigation and Canal Structures
Type
Code of Practice
International equivalents
Design of Small Canal Structures · U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), USAISO 9826:1992 · International Organization for Standardization (ISO), InternationalISO 4359:2013 · International Organization for Standardization (ISO), InternationalASTM D1941-17 · ASTM International, USA
Typically used with
IS 456IS 7784IS 10430
Also on InfraLens for IS 11551
6Key values2Tables4FAQs
Practical Notes
! Pay close attention to the design of transitions; improper splay angles can lead to flow separation, eddies, and significant energy losses, reducing the canal's efficiency.
! The structural design of the flume barrel and foundations to withstand hydrostatic and earth pressures must be carried out separately according to codes like IS 456.
! Ensure adequate freeboard is provided to prevent overtopping of canal banks, especially upstream of the flume, considering potential surges and inaccurate hydraulic calculations.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 3Classification of FlumesCl. 4Design Considerations (including freeboard and velocity)Cl. 5Design of Flumes in Sub-critical FlowCl. 6Design of TransitionsCl. 7Design of Flumes in Super-critical Flow
Pulled from IS 11551:1986. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
concretemasonrysteel

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
Design of Small Canal StructuresU.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), USA
HighCurrent
Design of Small Canal Structures
Comprehensive design manual covering hydraulic and structural aspects of flumes, transitions, and other irrigation structures.
ISO 9826:1992International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International
MediumCurrent
Measurement of liquid flow in open channels — Parshall and SANIIRI flumes
Focuses on the hydraulic performance and installation of specific flume types (Parshall) for flow measurement, not general structural design.
ISO 4359:2013International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International
MediumCurrent
Open-channel flow measurement -- Rectangular, trapezoidal and U-shaped flumes
Details hydraulic principles and geometry for long-throated flumes used in flow measurement, overlapping on hydraulic design but not structural.
ASTM D1941-17ASTM International, USA
LowCurrent
Standard Test Method for Open Channel Flow Measurement of Water with the Parshall Flume
A test method for flow measurement using a specific flume type, not a design criterion for constructing various flume structures.
Key Differences
≠IS 11551 is a comprehensive design standard covering both hydraulic principles and structural design considerations (loads, stability), whereas ISO and ASTM standards focus almost exclusively on hydraulic performance and flow measurement accuracy.
≠The USBR manual, being more modern (2014 vs. 1986), incorporates updated practices, potentially including considerations for precast elements, advanced materials, and more detailed guidance on minimizing cavitation, which are less emphasized in the IS code.
≠IS 11551 provides empirical design rules (e.g., transition splays) based on practices prevalent in India, which may differ from the optimized, research-based values for head loss recovery and flow stability found in USBR and ISO documents.
≠Structural load considerations in IS 11551 reference Indian codes for seismic (IS 1893) and concrete design (IS 456), whereas international equivalents would reference their respective national or regional codes (e.g., ASCE 7 for loads in the US).
Key Similarities
≈All standards are fundamentally based on the principles of conservation of energy (Bernoulli's principle) and the concept of specific energy to analyze flow through a constriction.
≈The core design concept of creating a control section by accelerating flow from subcritical to critical or supercritical in a throat is common across all standards for designing measuring flumes.
≈All standards recognize the importance of smooth, gradual transitions (converging inlet and diverging outlet) to minimize energy losses and ensure stable flow conditions.
≈The classification of flow conditions as modular (free flow) or non-modular (submerged flow) and the definition of a modularity limit (submergence ratio) are common hydraulic principles.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Converging Transition Splay (Angle)1 in 3 (approx. 18.4°)Typically 1 in 4 to 1 in 2.5 (14° to 22.5°); angles around 12.5° are also common.USBR Design of Small Canal Structures
Diverging Transition Splay (Angle)1 in 5 (approx. 11.3°)Flatter slopes are preferred for better energy recovery, typically 1 in 6 (9.5°) to 1 in 10 (5.7°).USBR Design of Small Canal Structures
Minimum Freeboard at Flume EntryGreater of 15 cm or one-third of the head loss (HL/3) above FSL.Typically a function of discharge, e.g., 0.3m for small flows (<3 m³/s) up to 1.0m for large canals.USBR Design of Small Canal Structures
Modularity Limit for Parshall FlumesNot explicitly defined; states modularity should be ensured.0.7 for throat widths from 1 ft to 8 ft.ISO 9826:1992
Location of Upstream Head Measurement (Ha)At a distance of 2 to 3 times the upstream head (H) from the beginning of the transition.At a specific distance 'A' from the flume crest, where A is 2/3 of the converging section length.ISO 9826:1992 (for Parshall Flumes)
Side Wall Height in ThroatShould be equal to the upstream total energy line (TEL).Should be at least the upstream water depth (y1) or slightly higher to contain flow variations.USBR Design of Small Canal Structures
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values6

Quick Reference Values
Recommended inlet transition splay (sub-critical)1 in 2.5 (22.5 degrees)
Recommended outlet transition splay (sub-critical)1 in 2 (30 degrees)
Minimum recommended freeboard0.5 m to 0.75 m (varies with discharge)
Contraction loss coefficient (Kc) for well-designed transitions0.1 to 0.2
Expansion loss coefficient (Ke) for well-designed transitions0.2 to 0.3
Manning's 'n' for smooth concrete finish0.014 - 0.016
Key Formulas
Freeboard = C * (y)^1/3, where y is depth of flow and C is a coefficient from Table 1
Head loss in contraction: hc = Kc * (V2^2 - V1^2) / 2g
Head loss in expansion: he = Ke * (V1^2 - V2^2) / 2g
Froude Number: Fr = V / (gD)^0.5

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Values of Coefficient 'C' for different discharges (for freeboard calculation)
Table 2 - Value of Contraction and Expansion Loss Coefficients
Key Clauses
Clause 3 - Classification of Flumes
Clause 4 - Design Considerations (including freeboard and velocity)
Clause 5 - Design of Flumes in Sub-critical Flow
Clause 6 - Design of Transitions
Clause 7 - Design of Flumes in Super-critical Flow

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Pract...
→
IS 7784:2010Code of Practice for Design of Parallel Runwa...
→
IS 10430:2009Criteria for Design of Siphons
→

Frequently Asked Questions4

What is the primary purpose of a flume in a canal?+
A flume is a specifically engineered channel section used to convey water over an obstacle like a valley, river, or road, often by constricting the flow to increase velocity and reduce the structural cross-section.
What is the recommended splay for transitions in sub-critical flow?+
The code recommends a contraction splay of 1 in 2.5 (22.5°) at the inlet and an expansion splay of 1 in 2 (30°) at the outlet (Clause 6.1).
Why is it important to design for either sub-critical or super-critical flow?+
Flow near the critical depth (Froude number ≈ 1) is unstable, leading to surface waves and unpredictable water levels. Designing firmly in the sub-critical (Fr < 1) or super-critical (Fr > 1) range ensures stable and predictable flow behavior.
How is freeboard determined for a canal with a flume?+
Freeboard is the vertical distance from the full supply level to the top of the lining. It is calculated using the formula F = C * (y)^1/3, where 'y' is the flow depth and 'C' is a coefficient based on the canal's discharge (Clause 4.5 and Table 1).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →