InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel
InfraLensInfraLens
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRRulesAbout Join Channel
Join
IS CodesIRCToolsSORHandbookQA/QCPMCFormatsCPHEEOMapsProjectsDCRDesign RulesBIMAbout Join WhatsApp Channel

IS 10243 Part 1 : 1982Acceptance Levels for Discontinuities in Welds - Part 1: Radiographic Examination

PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
ISO 10675-1 · EN ISO 10675-1 · ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 1, UW
CurrentSpecializedSpecificationMaterials Science · Steel and Reinforcement
PDFGoogleCompareBIS Portal
Link points to Internet Archive / others. Not hosted by InfraLens. Details
OverviewValues5InternationalTablesFAQ3Related

IS 10243:1982 Part 1 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for acceptance levels for discontinuities in welds - part 1: radiographic examination. This standard provides acceptance criteria for discontinuities in steel butt welds based on radiographic examination. It establishes three quality classes for welds and provides detailed tables specifying the permissible type, size, and distribution of defects like porosity, slag inclusions, and lack of penetration.

Specifies acceptance levels for discontinuities found in welds during radiographic examination.

Overview

Status
Current
Usage level
Specialized
Domain
Materials Science — Steel and Reinforcement
Type
Specification
International equivalents
ISO 10675-1:2016 · International Organization for Standardization (ISO), SwitzerlandEN ISO 10675-1:2016 · European Committee for Standardization (CEN), EuropeASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 1, UW-51 · American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), USAAWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020 · American Welding Society (AWS), USA
Typically used with
IS 812IS 818
Also on InfraLens for IS 10243
5Key values3Tables3FAQs
Practical Notes
! This standard was reaffirmed in 2003. While still in use, many projects now specify newer international standards like ISO 5817 or ASME Section IX for weld quality.
! The weld quality class (1, 2, or 3) is a critical design input and must be clearly specified in engineering drawings or contract documents before fabrication begins.
! This code only provides acceptance limits; the procedure for conducting radiographic testing itself is covered in other standards like IS 2595.
Frequently referenced clauses
Cl. 3Classification of WeldsCl. 4Acceptance LevelsCl. 4.2Planar DiscontinuitiesCl. 4.3Cavities
Pulled from IS 10243:1982. Browse the full clause & table index below in Tables & Referenced Sections.
steelweldsbutt welds

International Equivalents

Similar International Standards
ISO 10675-1:2016International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Switzerland
HighCurrent
Non-destructive testing of welds — Acceptance levels for radiographic testing — Part 1: Steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys
Directly specifies acceptance levels for weld discontinuities using radiographic examination.
EN ISO 10675-1:2016European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Europe
HighCurrent
Non-destructive testing of welds - Acceptance levels for radiographic testing - Part 1: Steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys
The European adoption of ISO 10675-1, making it technically identical.
ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 1, UW-51American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), USA
MediumCurrent
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII: Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 1 (Radiographic Examination of Welded Joints)
Provides mandatory radiographic acceptance criteria specifically for welds in pressure vessels.
AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2020American Welding Society (AWS), USA
MediumCurrent
Structural Welding Code — Steel
Contains a dedicated chapter for NDT, including RT acceptance criteria for structural steel welds.
Key Differences
≠IS 10243:1982 is a significantly older standard. Modern codes like ISO 10675-1:2016 reflect over 30 years of advancements in materials science, welding technology, and non-destructive testing interpretation.
≠IS 10243 uses a 'Class' system (Class 1, 2, 3) for quality levels. ISO 10675-1 uses 'Acceptance Levels' (AL 1, 2, 3) which are directly correlated to the 'Quality Levels' (B, C, D) of the master standard ISO 5817, creating a more integrated system.
≠The specific quantitative limits for discontinuities like slag inclusions or porosity often differ. For example, ISO standards may permit longer elongated inclusions than the IS code, but have stricter rules on their proximity.
≠International standards like ASME and AWS are often application-specific (pressure vessels, structures), leading to criteria tailored for specific failure modes (e.g., fatigue, brittle fracture), whereas IS 10243 is more general.
Key Similarities
≈All standards have a zero-tolerance policy for any type of crack, regardless of size or location. The detection of a crack is an automatic cause for rejection.
≈The fundamental principle of relating the acceptable size of a discontinuity to the parent material thickness (t) or weld throat thickness is common across all standards.
≈All standards categorize and provide acceptance limits for the same fundamental types of weld discontinuities visible on a radiograph, such as porosity, inclusions, lack of fusion, and lack of penetration.
≈Each standard provides a tiered system of quality, allowing users to select an appropriate level of weld integrity based on the application's criticality, from the most stringent (IS Class 1, ISO AL 1) to a more lenient, general-purpose level.
Parameter Comparison
ParameterIS ValueInternationalSource
Primary ClassificationClass 1, 2, 3 (Class 1 is highest quality)Acceptance Level 1, 2, 3 (AL 1 is highest quality)ISO 10675-1:2016
CracksNot permitted for any Class.Not permitted for any Acceptance Level.ISO 10675-1:2016
Lack of FusionNot permitted for Class 1. For Class 2, intermittent with limited length.Not permitted for AL 1. For AL 2, intermittent with limited length (l ≤ t).ISO 10675-1:2016
Single Pore Max Diameter (for t=10mm)Class 2: Max 1/4 t = 2.5 mmAL 2: Max 0.4 t = 4.0 mmISO 10675-1:2016
Elongated Inclusion Max Length (for t=15mm)Class 2: Max 1/3 t = 5 mmAL 2: Max 2t, but not > 50 mm = 30 mmISO 10675-1:2016
Acceptance of Rounded IndicationsDefined by tables based on pore size and count.Defined by charts of acceptable size and number based on weld length and thickness.ASME BPVC Sec. VIII, Div. 1, Appendix 4
Reference for Cumulative ImperfectionsAssessed over a length of 100 mm.Assessed over a length of weld l (l = 100mm). The sum of imperfections shall not exceed the maximum permissible percentage of l.ISO 10675-1:2016
⚠ Verify details from original standards before use

Key Values5

Quick Reference Values
Crack acceptability0 mm (Not permitted for any class)
Lack of fusion acceptability0 mm (Not permitted for any class)
Max slag inclusion length (Class 2, t=20mm)10 mm
Max single pore diameter (Class 1, t=10mm)2.5 mm
Max single pore diameter (Class 3, t=10mm)3.5 mm

Tables & Referenced Sections

Key Tables
Table 1 - Permissible Discontinuities for Class 1 Welds
Table 2 - Permissible Discontinuities for Class 2 Welds
Table 3 - Permissible Discontinuities for Class 3 Welds
Key Clauses
Clause 3 - Classification of Welds
Clause 4 - Acceptance Levels
Clause 4.2 - Planar Discontinuities
Clause 4.3 - Cavities

Related Resources on InfraLens

Cross-Referenced Codes
IS 812:1957Method for Coding of Covered Electrodes for M...
→
IS 818:2019Code of Practice for Safety and Health Requir...
→

Frequently Asked Questions3

Are any cracks acceptable under IS 10243?+
No. Cracks of any size or type are not permitted for any of the three weld quality classes (Tables 1, 2, and 3).
What are the three classes of welds defined in the code?+
Class 1 for the highest quality requirements (e.g., critical pressure vessels), Class 2 for general purpose engineering (most common), and Class 3 for less critical applications (Clause 3).
What is the difference in acceptance for slag inclusions between Class 1 and Class 2 welds?+
Class 1 has much stricter limits. For a given plate thickness, the maximum permissible length and width of a slag inclusion are significantly smaller for Class 1 compared to Class 2 (Table 1 vs Table 2).

QA/QC Inspection Templates

📋
QA/QC templates coming soon for this code.
Browse all 300 templates →